OBJECTIVES: To (1) quantify mucosal cooling (ie, heat loss) spatially in the nasal passages of nasal airway obstruction (NAO) patients before and after surgery using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and (2) correlate mucosal cooling with patient-reported symptoms, as measured by the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) and a visual analog scale (VAS) for sensation of nasal airflow. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective. SETTING: Academic tertiary medical center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) scans and NOSE and VAS surveys were obtained from 10 patients before and after surgery to relieve NAO. Three-dimensional models of each patient's nasal anatomy were used to run steady-state CFD simulations of airflow and heat transfer during inspiration. Heat loss across the nasal vestibule and the entire nasal cavity, as well as the surface area of mucosa exposed to heat fluxes >50 W/m(2), were compared pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS: After surgery, heat loss increased significantly on the preoperative most obstructed side (P < .0002). A larger surface area of nasal mucosa was exposed to heat fluxes >50 W/m(2) after surgery. The best correlation between patient-reported and CFD measures of nasal patency was obtained for NOSE against surface area in which heat fluxes were >50 W/m(2) (Pearson r = -0.76). CONCLUSION: A significant postoperative increase in mucosal cooling correlates well with patients' perception of better nasal patency after NAO surgery. Computational fluid dynamics-derived heat fluxes may prove to be a valuable predictor of success in NAO surgery.
OBJECTIVES: To (1) quantify mucosal cooling (ie, heat loss) spatially in the nasal passages of nasal airway obstruction (NAO) patients before and after surgery using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and (2) correlate mucosal cooling with patient-reported symptoms, as measured by the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) and a visual analog scale (VAS) for sensation of nasal airflow. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective. SETTING: Academic tertiary medical center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) scans and NOSE and VAS surveys were obtained from 10 patients before and after surgery to relieve NAO. Three-dimensional models of each patient's nasal anatomy were used to run steady-state CFD simulations of airflow and heat transfer during inspiration. Heat loss across the nasal vestibule and the entire nasal cavity, as well as the surface area of mucosa exposed to heat fluxes >50 W/m(2), were compared pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS: After surgery, heat loss increased significantly on the preoperative most obstructed side (P < .0002). A larger surface area of nasal mucosa was exposed to heat fluxes >50 W/m(2) after surgery. The best correlation between patient-reported and CFD measures of nasal patency was obtained for NOSE against surface area in which heat fluxes were >50 W/m(2) (Pearson r = -0.76). CONCLUSION: A significant postoperative increase in mucosal cooling correlates well with patients' perception of better nasal patency after NAO surgery. Computational fluid dynamics-derived heat fluxes may prove to be a valuable predictor of success in NAO surgery.
Authors: Michael G Stewart; David L Witsell; Timothy L Smith; Edward M Weaver; Bevan Yueh; Maureen T Hannley Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Julia S Kimbell; Guilherme J M Garcia; Dennis O Frank; Daniel E Cannon; Sachin S Pawar; John S Rhee Journal: Am J Rhinol Allergy Date: 2012 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.467
Authors: Daniel E Cannon; Dennis O Frank; Julia S Kimbell; David M Poetker; John S Rhee Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2013-01-11 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Kai Zhao; Jianbo Jiang; Kara Blacker; Brian Lyman; Pamela Dalton; Beverly J Cowart; Edmund A Pribitkin Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2013-06-28 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Azadeh A T Borojeni; Guilherme J M Garcia; Masoud Gh Moghaddam; Dennis O Frank-Ito; Julia S Kimbell; Purushottam W Laud; Lisa J Koenig; John S Rhee Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2019-07-02 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Masoud Gh Moghaddam; Guilherme J M Garcia; Dennis O Frank-Ito; Julia S Kimbell; John S Rhee Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2020-02-20 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Eric Moreddu; Lionel Meister; Alexia Dabadie; Jean-Michel Triglia; Marc Médale; Richard Nicollas Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2019-12-17 Impact factor: 2.602
Authors: Bryan M Brandon; Wesley H Stepp; Saikat Basu; Julia S Kimbell; Brent A Senior; William W Shockley; J Madison Clark Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2020-05-04 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Azadeh A T Borojeni; Dennis O Frank-Ito; Julia S Kimbell; John S Rhee; Guilherme J M Garcia Journal: Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng Date: 2016-09-21 Impact factor: 2.747
Authors: Anna S Englhard; Maximilian Wiedmann; Georg J Ledderose; Bryan Lemieux; Alan Badran; Zhongping Chen; Christian S Betz; Brian J Wong Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2015-11-24 Impact factor: 3.325