Literature DB >> 24604253

A systematic review of patient-reported nasal obstruction scores: defining normative and symptomatic ranges in surgical patients.

John S Rhee, Corbin D Sullivan, Dennis O Frank, Julia S Kimbell, Guilherme J M Garcia.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE A gold standard objective measure of nasal airway obstruction (NAO) does not currently exist, so patient-reported measures are commonly used, particularly the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale and the visual analog scale (VAS). However, questions remain regarding how best to use these instruments. OBJECTIVES To systematically review studies on NOSE and VAS scores in patients with NAO and to compile and standardize the data to (1) define symptomatic and normative values for presurgical and postsurgical patients with NAO, asymptomatic individuals, and the general population; (2) determine if postsurgical scores are comparable with asymptomatic scores; and (3) determine if there is a clinically useful preoperative and postoperative score change. EVIDENCE REVIEW A systematic review of the literature was performed through PubMed for studies assessing NOSE and VAS scores in patients with chronic NAO. Strict inclusion criteria were applied to focus on anatomic obstruction only. For statistical analysis, the patients were classified as asymptomatic, presurgical and postsurgical with NAO, and the general population. FINDINGS The mean (SD) NOSE and VAS scores for a patient with NAO were 65 (22) and 6.9 (2.3), respectively. The mean postsurgical NOSE and VAS scores were 23 (20) and 2.1 (2.2), respectively. The mean asymptomatic individual NOSE and VAS scores were 15 (17) and 2.1 (1.6). The mean NOSE and VAS scores for the general population were 42 (27) and 4.6 (2.6), respectively. The mean presurgical to postsurgical change was more than 40 for NOSE scores and more than 4.0 for VAS scores. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE We have shown that normative and abnormal value ranges for NOSE and VAS can be established for clinical use. Given the consistency of both scales, we conclude that these measures can be used as a clinically meaningful measure of successful surgical outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24604253      PMCID: PMC4072745          DOI: 10.1001/jamafacial.2013.2473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg        ISSN: 2168-6076            Impact factor:   4.611


  37 in total

1.  The role of mucosal receptors in the nasal sensation of airflow.

Authors:  R W Clarke; A S Jones; P Charters; I Sherman
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1992-10

2.  Development and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale.

Authors:  Michael G Stewart; David L Witsell; Timothy L Smith; Edward M Weaver; Bevan Yueh; Maureen T Hannley
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  The effect of nasal mucosal vasoconstriction on nasal airflow sensation.

Authors:  R W Clarke; J A Cook; A S Jones
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1995-02

4.  Role of the external nasal dilator in the management of nasal obstruction.

Authors:  R Roithmann; J Chapnik; P Cole; J Szalai; N Zamel
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Septoplasty and compensatory inferior turbinate hypertrophy: long-term results after randomized turbinoplasty.

Authors:  P Illum
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Nasal airflow: resistance and sensation.

Authors:  A S Jones; D J Willatt; L M Durham
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 1.469

7.  The efficacy of nasal septal surgery.

Authors:  I Samad; H E Stevens; A Maloney
Journal:  J Otolaryngol       Date:  1992-04

8.  Long-term results of septoplastic operations.

Authors:  H Dommerby; O R Rasmussen; J Rosborg
Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.538

9.  Effect of turbinate surgery in rhinoseptoplasty on quality-of-life and acoustic rhinometry outcomes: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Michelle Lavinsky-Wolff; Humberto Lopes Camargo; Carolina Rocha Barone; Luisi Rabaioli; Fernando Herz Wolff; José Eduardo Lutaif Dolci; Carisi Anne Polanczyk
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  The role of acoustic rhinometry in the pre- and postoperative evaluation of surgery for nasal obstruction.

Authors:  M Reber; F Rahm; P Monnier
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.681

View more
  52 in total

1.  Estimates of nasal airflow at the nasal cycle mid-point improve the correlation between objective and subjective measures of nasal patency.

Authors:  Courtney Gaberino; John S Rhee; Guilherme J M Garcia
Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 1.931

2.  Validated Measures of Insomnia, Function, Sleepiness, and Nasal Obstruction in a CPAP Alternatives Clinic Population.

Authors:  Austin S Lam; Nancy A Collop; Donald L Bliwise; Raj C Dedhia
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.062

3.  Normative ranges of nasal airflow variables in healthy adults.

Authors:  Azadeh A T Borojeni; Guilherme J M Garcia; Masoud Gh Moghaddam; Dennis O Frank-Ito; Julia S Kimbell; Purushottam W Laud; Lisa J Koenig; John S Rhee
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Impact of Middle versus Inferior Total Turbinectomy on Nasal Aerodynamics.

Authors:  Anupriya Dayal; John S Rhee; Guilherme J M Garcia
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.497

5.  Virtual septoplasty: a method to predict surgical outcomes for patients with nasal airway obstruction.

Authors:  Masoud Gh Moghaddam; Guilherme J M Garcia; Dennis O Frank-Ito; Julia S Kimbell; John S Rhee
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow as an Objective Measure of Nasal Obstruction and Functional Septorhinoplasty Outcomes.

Authors:  Jennifer C Fuller; Carly H Bernstein; Patricia A Levesque; Robin W Lindsay
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.611

7.  A national survey of functional septorhinoplasty surgery performed in the United Kingdom: a clinician end-user questionnaire to assess current practice and help inform future practice.

Authors:  Samit Unadkat; Alfonso Luca Pendolino; Anil Joshi; Rajiv Bhalla; Timothy Woolford; Alwyn D'Souza; Premjit Randhawa; Hesham Saleh; Peter Andrews
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Correlation between Subjective Nasal Patency and Intranasal Airflow Distribution.

Authors:  Kevin P Casey; Azadeh A T Borojeni; Lisa J Koenig; John S Rhee; Guilherme J M Garcia
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  Creation of an idealized nasopharynx geometry for accurate computational fluid dynamics simulations of nasal airflow in patient-specific models lacking the nasopharynx anatomy.

Authors:  Azadeh A T Borojeni; Dennis O Frank-Ito; Julia S Kimbell; John S Rhee; Guilherme J M Garcia
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.747

10.  Imaging of the internal nasal valve using long-range Fourier domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Anna S Englhard; Maximilian Wiedmann; Georg J Ledderose; Bryan Lemieux; Alan Badran; Zhongping Chen; Christian S Betz; Brian J Wong
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.325

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.