Literature DB >> 11849202

Comparison of the clinical efficacy of standard and mucoadhesive-based nasal decongestants.

Christo T Tzachev1, Mariana Mandajieva, Evgeniy H Minkov, Todor A Popov.   

Abstract

AIMS: To compare two xylometazoline 0.1% preparations: reference commercial solution (RS) and test mucoadhesive solution (TS).
METHODS: Twenty subjects with perennial allergic rhinitis (age range 18-69 years, 5 atopic, 7 men) applied randomly in turn TS and RS for 5 days in a double-blind crossover clinical trial. Nasal airflow resistance (NAR), nasal symptoms (6 grade scoring), frequency of application (times/day), and side-effects were recorded.
RESULTS: Mean ratio TS/RS of areas under the resistance/time curves for NAR +/- 90% CI: 3.56 +/- 0.92; mean TS-RS differences +/- 95% CI: for congestion: -1.12 +/- 0.59, for frequency of application: -1.10 +/- 0.20. Subjects experienced fewer side-effects with TS.
CONCLUSIONS: A mucoadhesive solution with a decongestant had a greater and longer lasting effect on nasal congestion in subjects with perennial allergic rhinitis than the commercially available decongestant solution. It also caused fewer side effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11849202      PMCID: PMC1874552          DOI: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01525.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  7 in total

1.  Sensation of nasal airflow compared with nasal airway resistance in patients with rhinitis.

Authors:  M Simola; H Malmberg
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1997-06

2.  Evaluation of the clearance characteristics of bioadhesive systems in humans.

Authors:  R J Soane; M Frier; A C Perkins; N S Jones; S S Davis; L Illum
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  1999-02-01       Impact factor: 5.875

3.  Nasal airflow: resistance and sensation.

Authors:  A S Jones; D J Willatt; L M Durham
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 1.469

Review 4.  Is the use of benzalkonium chloride as a preservative for nasal formulations a safety concern? A cautionary note based on compromised mucociliary transport.

Authors:  I L Bernstein
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 10.793

Review 5.  Rhinitis medicamentosa: aspects of pathophysiology and treatment.

Authors:  P Graf
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 13.146

6.  Objective and subjective nasal airflow.

Authors:  E Yaniv; T Hadar; J Shvero; E Raveh
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.808

7.  A comparison of the effects of an alpha-agonist, an anti-muscarinic agent and placebo on intranasal histamine challenge in allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  M A Birchall; J C Henderson; N B Pride; R W Fuller
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1996-06
  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems.

Authors:  Rahamatullah Shaikh; Thakur Raghu Raj Singh; Martin James Garland; A David Woolfson; Ryan F Donnelly
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2011-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.