Literature DB >> 18210011

[Diagnostic methods of nasal respiratory function].

G Mlynski1, A Beule.   

Abstract

Objective assessment of nasal obstruction may help with preoperative planning for rhinosurgery and indicate different aspects of endonasal pathology. To improve quality control, preoperative and postoperative objective assessment is desirable. This review presents objective functional diagnostic tools and explains their appropriate uses, the information obtained, and their limitations. An algorithm is presented for analysing nasal obstruction by means of objective functional assessment. Examples illustrate how to use this information for preoperative planning in rhinosurgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18210011     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-007-1655-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  21 in total

1.  Correlation of nasal morphology and respiratory function.

Authors:  G Mlynski; S Grützenmacher; S Plontke; B Mlynski; C Lang
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.681

2.  Accuracy of acoustic rhinometry.

Authors:  P G Djupesland; J S Røtnes
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.681

3.  Acoustic rhinometry and paranasal cavities: a systematic study in box models.

Authors:  Robert Mlynski; Stefan Grützenmacher; Christian Lang; Gunter Mlynski
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  [Nasal cavity dimensions in the infants measured with acoustic rhinometry].

Authors:  J Zheng; Y Wang; W Sun; Z Dong; Z Yang
Journal:  Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2001-12

5.  Reference values for acoustic rhinometry in decongested school children and adults: the most sensitive measurement for change in nasal patency.

Authors:  Sune P Straszek; Vivi Schlünssen; T Sigsgaard; Ole F Pedersen
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.681

6.  Correlation between nasal obstruction symptoms and objective parameters of acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry.

Authors:  C S Kim; B K Moon; D H Jung; Y G Min
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.863

7.  Acoustic rhinometry: influence of paranasal sinuses.

Authors:  O Hilberg; O F Pedersen
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1996-05

8.  Acoustic rhinometry: evaluation of nasal cavity geometry by acoustic reflection.

Authors:  O Hilberg; A C Jackson; D L Swift; O F Pedersen
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1989-01

9.  Posture and nasal patency: evaluation by acoustic rhinometry.

Authors:  Y Kase; O Hilberg; O F Pedersen
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 1.494

10.  Rhinomanometry for preoperative and postoperative assessment of nasal obstruction.

Authors:  A S Gordon; T V McCaffrey; E B Kern; J F Pallanch
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.497

View more
  5 in total

1.  [Numerical flow simulation : A new method for assessing nasal breathing].

Authors:  T Hildebrandt; J Osman; L Goubergrits
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [CT rhinometry : a correlation of rhinomanometry and multiplanar computer tomography of the nasal cavity].

Authors:  K W G Eichhorn; B Schneider; T A Bley; I Wagner; A Schröck; M Jakob
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Physiology and pathophysiology of respiratory mucosa of the nose and the paranasal sinuses.

Authors:  Achim G Beule
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-04-27

4.  Correlation of three variables describing nasal patency (HD, MCA, NOSE score) in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Thomas Braun; Maria Rich; Matthias F Kramer
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013 May-Jun

5.  [Definition and illustration of the different types of nasal cycle using long-term rhinometry].

Authors:  E F Reins; C Weindel; T K Hoffmann; F Sommer; F Stupp; A-S Halbig; J Lindemann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 1.284

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.