Literature DB >> 25847728

Neck range of motion measurements using a new three-dimensional motion analysis system: validity and repeatability.

Haruhi Inokuchi1, Michio Tojima1,2, Hiroshi Mano1, Yuki Ishikawa3,4, Naoshi Ogata3,5, Nobuhiko Haga6,7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Neck movement is important for many activities of daily living (ADL). Neck disorders, such as cervical spondylosis and whiplash can limit neck movement and ADL. The cervical range of motion (CROM) device has been recently used to measure neck range of motion (ROM); however, this measurement includes trunk motion, and therefore does not represent a pure neck ROM measurement. The authors aimed to develop a new method to establish pure neck ROM measurements during flexion, extension, lateral bending, and rotation using a three-dimensional motion analysis system, VICON.
METHODS: Twelve healthy participants were recruited and neck ROMs during flexion, extension, lateral bending, and rotation were measured using VICON and the CROM device. Test-retest repeatability was assessed using interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal detectable change (MDC). Validity between two measurements was evaluated using a determination coefficient and Pearson's correlation coefficient.
RESULTS: ICCs of neck ROM measured using VICON and the CROM device were all at substantial or almost perfect levels [VICON: ICC(1,2) = 0.786-0.962, the CROM device: ICC(1,2) = 0.736-0.950]. Both SEMs and MDCs were low in all measurement directions (VICON: SEM = 1.3°-4.5°, MDC = 3.6°-12.5°; the CROM device: SEM = 2.2°-3.9°, MDC = 6.1°-10.7°). Determination coefficients (R(2)s) and Pearson's correlation coefficients (rs) between the two measurement methods were high (R(2) = 0.607-0.745, r = 0.779-0.863).
CONCLUSIONS: VICON is a useful system to measure neck ROMs and evaluate the efficacy of interventions, such as surgery or physiotherapeutic exercise.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Motion analysis; Neck; Range of motion; Repeatability; Validity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25847728     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-3913-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  36 in total

1.  Accuracy and reliability of a new, protractor-based neck goniometer.

Authors:  Michael John Haynes; Stephen Edmondston
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.437

2.  Study of normal range of motion in the neck utilizing a bubble goniometer.

Authors:  C A BUCK; F B DAMERON; M J DOW; H V SKOWLUND
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1959-09       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  What is the chin-down posture? A questionnaire survey of speech language pathologists in Japan and the United States.

Authors:  Sumiko Okada; Eiichi Saitoh; Jeffrey B Palmer; Koichiro Matsuo; Michio Yokoyama; Ritsuko Shigeta; Mikoto Baba
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Quantitative comparison of five current protocols in gait analysis.

Authors:  Alberto Ferrari; Maria Grazia Benedetti; Esteban Pavan; Carlo Frigo; Dario Bettinelli; Marco Rabuffetti; Paolo Crenna; Alberto Leardini
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 5.  A systematic review of reliability and validity studies of methods for measuring active and passive cervical range of motion.

Authors:  Mark A Williams; Christopher J McCarthy; Angeliki Chorti; Matthew W Cooke; Simon Gates
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 6.  Cervical alignment and range of motion after laminoplasty: radiographical data from more than 500 cases with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Masaaki Machino; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Tetsuro Hida; Keigo Ito; Hiroaki Nakashima; Shunsuke Kanbara; Daigo Morita; Fumihiko Kato
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Comparison and evaluation of two common methods to measure center of mass displacement in three dimensions during gait.

Authors:  Elena M Gutierrez-Farewik; Asa Bartonek; Helena Saraste
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 2.161

8.  Active range of motion of the head and cervical spine: a three-dimensional investigation in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Virgilio F Ferrario; Chiarella Sforza; Graziano Serrao; GianPiero Grassi; Erio Mossi
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 9.  Cervical range of motion in the elderly.

Authors:  K A Kuhlman
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Normal range of motion of the cervical spine.

Authors:  B Lind; H Sihlbom; A Nordwall; H Malchau
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.966

View more
  11 in total

1.  [Three-dimensional reconstruction of cervical CT vs ultrasound for estimating residual thyroid volume].

Authors:  Hongjuan Wang; Fei Chen; Yongquan Zhang; Zhichao Li; Ying Wang; Qiang Li
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2019-03-30

2.  Interexaminer Reliability and Validity of Quantity of Cervical Mobility during Online Dynamic Inspection.

Authors:  Leire Leonet-Tijero; Jaime Corral-de-Toro; Jacobo Rodríguez-Sanz; Mar Hernández-Secorún; Hugo Abenia-Benedí; María Orosia Lucha-López; Sofía Monti-Ballano; Julián Müller-Thyssen-Uriarte; Héctor Tricás-Vidal; César Hidalgo-García; José Miguel Tricás-Moreno
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-21

3.  Effects of SNAG mobilization combined with a self-SNAG home-exercise for the treatment of cervicogenic headache: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Paquin; Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme; Jean-Pierre Dumas
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2021-02-05

4.  The effect of mind-body exercise on the cervical spine mobility of people with neck discomfort: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xianhui Liao; Beihai Ge; Qiang Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Measurements of cervical range of motion using an optical motion capture system: Repeatability and validity.

Authors:  Minshan Feng; Long Liang; Wu Sun; Guang Wei Liu; Xunlu Yin; Tao Han; Xu Wei; Liguo Zhu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Intra- and inter-rater reliability of joint range of motion tests using tape measure, digital inclinometer and inertial motion capturing.

Authors:  Laura Fraeulin; Fabian Holzgreve; Mark Brinkbäumer; Anna Dziuba; David Friebe; Stefanie Klemz; Marco Schmitt; Anna-Lena Theis A; Sarah Tenberg; Anke van Mark; Christian Maurer-Grubinger; Daniela Ohlendorf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Prevalence of Static Balance Impairment and Associated Factors of University Student Smartphone Users with Subclinical Neck Pain: Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Saw Wah Wah; Uraiwan Chatchawan; Thiwaphon Chatprem; Rungthip Puntumetakul
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-28       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  Cervical Spine Assessment Using Passive and Active Mobilization Recorded Through an Optical Motion Capture.

Authors:  Alejandro J Moreno; Gonzalo Utrilla; Javier Marin; Jose J Marin; Maria B Sanchez-Valverde; Ana C Royo
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2018-09-15

9.  The effect of mind-body exercise on cervical spine mobility of people with neck discomfort: A systemic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Xianhui Liao; Hao Chen; Beihai Ge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effects of Proprioceptive and Craniocervical Flexor Training on Static Balance in University Student Smartphone Users with Balance Impairment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Saw Wah Wah; Rungthip Puntumetakul; Rose Boucaut
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.133

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.