Literature DB >> 12466776

Accuracy and reliability of a new, protractor-based neck goniometer.

Michael John Haynes1, Stephen Edmondston.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the reliability of the SpinT, a new protractor-based device, for measuring active cervical spine ranges of motion. In addition, to compare the accuracy of the Cervical Ranges of Motion (CROM) instrument and SpinT measurements of rotation about the Y axis with and without tilt, the former motion occurring during natural rotation of the head. STUDY
DESIGN: Interexaminer reliability, intraexaminer reliability, and accuracy trials were conducted.
METHODS: Two examiners made 2 individual measurements of each of the individual cervical ranges of motion of 23 patients (15 men, 8 women; aged 21 to 42 years) with no cervical symptoms. The patients were asked to move their necks to end range while they sat upright. The accuracy of the CROM instrument and SpinT goniometers was assessed with a testing instrument capable of rotating and/or tilting to preset angles and upon which either device could be positioned.
RESULTS: There was excellent agreement between the SpinT measurements of rotation about the Y axis compared with the readings from the testing platform regardless of the angle of tilt, whereas the CROM instrument displayed poor concordance when the tilt exceeded 5 degrees. The reliability trials generally yielded close agreement between the examiners, especially regarding measurements of rotation left and right and extension and revealed higher concordance regarding intraexaminer results.
CONCLUSION: This study indicates that SpinT measurements of active cervical ranges of motion are reliable and that the SpinT goniometer accurately measures rotation with associated tilt.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12466776     DOI: 10.1067/mmt.2002.128370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther        ISSN: 0161-4754            Impact factor:   1.437


  5 in total

1.  Neck range of motion measurements using a new three-dimensional motion analysis system: validity and repeatability.

Authors:  Haruhi Inokuchi; Michio Tojima; Hiroshi Mano; Yuki Ishikawa; Naoshi Ogata; Nobuhiko Haga
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Position-sensing technologies for movement analysis in stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  H Zheng; N D Black; N D Harris
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Efficacy of manual and manipulative therapy in the perception of pain and cervical motion in patients with tension-type headache: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Gemma V Espí-López; Antonia Gómez-Conesa
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2014-03

Review 4.  Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Chantal H P de Koning; Sylvia P van den Heuvel; J Bart Staal; Bouwien C M Smits-Engelsman; Erik J M Hendriks
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Review of methods used by chiropractors to determine the site for applying manipulation.

Authors:  John J Triano; Brian Budgell; Angela Bagnulo; Benjamin Roffey; Thomas Bergmann; Robert Cooperstein; Brian Gleberzon; Christopher Good; Jacquelyn Perron; Rodger Tepe
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2013-10-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.