CONTEXT: It has been assumed that the increase in urine calcium (Ca) that accompanies an increase in dietary protein was due to increased bone resorption. However, studies using stable Ca isotopes have found that dietary protein increases Ca absorption without increasing bone resorption. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to investigate the impact of a moderately high protein diet on bone mineral density (BMD). DESIGN: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of protein supplementation daily for 18 months. SETTING: The study was conducted at two institutional research centers. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred eight older women and men with a body mass index between 19 and 32 kg/m(2) and a self-reported protein intake between 0.6 and 1.0 g/kg participated in the study. INTERVENTION: Subjects were asked to incorporate either a 45-g whey protein or isocaloric maltodextrin supplement into their usual diet for 18 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: BMD by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, body composition, and markers of skeletal and mineral metabolism were measured at baseline and at 9 and 18 months. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups for changes in L-spine BMD (primary outcome) or the other skeletal sites of interest. Truncal lean mass was significantly higher in the protein group at 18 months (P = .048). C-terminal telopeptide (P = .0414), IGF-1 (P = .0054), and urinary urea (P < .001) were also higher in the protein group at the end of the study period. There was no difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate at 18 months. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that protein supplementation above the recommended dietary allowance (0.8 g/kg) may preserve fat-free mass without adversely affecting skeletal health or renal function in healthy older adults.
RCT Entities:
CONTEXT: It has been assumed that the increase in urine calcium (Ca) that accompanies an increase in dietary protein was due to increased bone resorption. However, studies using stable Ca isotopes have found that dietary protein increases Ca absorption without increasing bone resorption. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to investigate the impact of a moderately high protein diet on bone mineral density (BMD). DESIGN: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of protein supplementation daily for 18 months. SETTING: The study was conducted at two institutional research centers. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred eight older women and men with a body mass index between 19 and 32 kg/m(2) and a self-reported protein intake between 0.6 and 1.0 g/kg participated in the study. INTERVENTION: Subjects were asked to incorporate either a 45-g whey protein or isocaloric maltodextrin supplement into their usual diet for 18 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: BMD by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, body composition, and markers of skeletal and mineral metabolism were measured at baseline and at 9 and 18 months. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups for changes in L-spine BMD (primary outcome) or the other skeletal sites of interest. Truncal lean mass was significantly higher in the protein group at 18 months (P = .048). C-terminal telopeptide (P = .0414), IGF-1 (P = .0054), and urinary urea (P < .001) were also higher in the protein group at the end of the study period. There was no difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate at 18 months. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that protein supplementation above the recommended dietary allowance (0.8 g/kg) may preserve fat-free mass without adversely affecting skeletal health or renal function in healthy older adults.
Authors: Jessica D Bihuniak; Christine A Simpson; Rebecca R Sullivan; Donna M Caseria; Jane E Kerstetter; Karl L Insogna Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 4.910
Authors: Deeptha Sukumar; Hasina Ambia-Sobhan; Robert Zurfluh; Yvette Schlussel; Theodore J Stahl; Chris L Gordon; Sue A Shapses Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Erin Gaffney-Stomberg; Jay J Cao; Gregory G Lin; Charles R Wulff; Nancy E Murphy; Andrew J Young; James P McClung; Stefan M Pasiakos Journal: J Nutr Date: 2014-04-09 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Kun Zhu; Xingqiong Meng; Deborah A Kerr; Amanda Devine; Vicky Solah; Colin W Binns; Richard L Prince Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Jeannette M Beasley; Andrea Z LaCroix; Joseph C Larson; Ying Huang; Marian L Neuhouser; Lesley F Tinker; Rebecca Jackson; Linda Snetselaar; Karen C Johnson; Charles B Eaton; Ross L Prentice Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2014-02-19 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Andrea L Darling; D Joe Millward; David J Torgerson; Catherine E Hewitt; Susan A Lanham-New Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2009-11-04 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: C Beaudart; V Rabenda; M Simmons; A Geerinck; I Araujo De Carvalho; J-Y Reginster; J Amuthavalli Thiyagarajan; O Bruyère Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2018 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Ke-Hong Ding; Michael Cain; Michael Davis; Clare Bergson; Meghan McGee-Lawrence; Crystal Perkins; Trevor Hardigan; Xingming Shi; Qing Zhong; Jianrui Xu; Wendy B Bollag; William Hill; Mohammed Elsalanty; Monte Hunter; Maria C Isales; Patricia Lopez; Mark Hamrick; Carlos M Isales Journal: Bone Date: 2018-02-27 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: L Langsetmo; J M Shikany; A J Burghardt; P M Cawthon; E S Orwoll; J A Cauley; B C Taylor; J T Schousboe; D C Bauer; T N Vo; K E Ensrud Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2017-10-23 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Kelsey M Mangano; Shivani Sahni; Douglas P Kiel; Katherine L Tucker; Alyssa B Dufour; Marian T Hannan Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2017-02-08 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Lisa Langsetmo; James M Shikany; Peggy M Cawthon; Jane A Cauley; Brent C Taylor; Tien N Vo; Douglas C Bauer; Eric S Orwoll; John T Schousboe; Kristine E Ensrud Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2017-02-13 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Rebecca Sullivan; Alice Abraham; Christine Simpson; Elizabeth Olear; Thomas Carpenter; Yanhong Deng; Chuqing Chen; Karl L Insogna Journal: Calcif Tissue Int Date: 2018-01-30 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: R Rizzoli; E Biver; J-P Bonjour; V Coxam; D Goltzman; J A Kanis; J Lappe; L Rejnmark; S Sahni; C Weaver; H Weiler; J-Y Reginster Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2018-05-08 Impact factor: 4.507