Literature DB >> 25840654

Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of plain film radiographs between original film and smartphone capture: a pilot study.

Mindy Y Licurse1, Sung H Kim2, Woojin Kim2, Alexander T Ruutiainen2, Tessa S Cook2.   

Abstract

The use of mobile devices for medical image capture has become increasingly popular given the widespread use of smartphone cameras. Prior studies have generally compared mobile phone capture images to digitized images. However, many underserved and rural areas without picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) still depend greatly on the use of film radiographs. Additionally, there is a scarcity of specialty-trained or formally licensed radiologists in many of these regions. Subsequently, there is great potential for the use of smartphone capture of plain radiograph films which would allow for increased access to economical and efficient consultation from board-certified radiologists abroad. The present study addresses the ability to diagnose a subset of radiographic findings identified on both the original film radiograph and the captured camera phone image.

Keywords:  Diagnostic image quality; Digital image processing; Image quality analysis; ROC-based analysis; Teleradiology

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25840654      PMCID: PMC4636717          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-015-9783-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  11 in total

1.  A simple telemedicine system using a digital camera.

Authors:  P Corr; I Couper; S J Beningfield; M Mars
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 6.184

2.  Comparison of radiographic image quality from four digitization devices as viewed on computer monitors.

Authors:  H C Davidson; D J Johnston; M E Christian; H R Harnsberger
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Comparison of seven digital cameras for digitizing radiographs.

Authors:  Benjamin Brault; James Hoskinson; Laura Armbrust; George Milliken
Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.363

4.  Nonmydriatic digital ocular fundus photography on the iPhone 3G: the FOTO-ED study.

Authors:  Cédric Lamirel; Beau B Bruce; David W Wright; Nancy J Newman; Valérie Biousse
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-07

5.  Digital images obtained with a digital camera are not associated with a loss of critical information--a preliminary study.

Authors:  B Peretz; I Kaffe; E Amir
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  Comparison between different cost devices for digital capture of X-ray films: an image characteristics detection approach.

Authors:  Antonio José Salazar; Juan Camilo Camacho; Diego Andrés Aguirre
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Digital images taken with a mobile phone can assist in the triage of neurosurgical patients to a level 1 trauma centre.

Authors:  Timothy B Bullard; Marcy S Rosenberg; Jay Ladde; Nizam Razack; Hunaldo J Villalobos; Linda Papa
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 6.184

8.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.

Authors:  E R DeLong; D M DeLong; D L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Reliability and validity of a mobile phone for radiographic assessment of ankle injuries: a randomized inter- and intraobserver agreement study.

Authors:  Joshua N Tennant; Viswanathan Shankar; Douglas R Dirschl
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 2.827

10.  Emergency image transfer system through a mobile telephone in Japan: technical note.

Authors:  Mikito Yamada; Hirotaka Watarai; Takashi Andou; Noboru Sakai
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  5 in total

1.  Digitizing an Analog Radiography Teaching File Under Time Constraint: Trade-Offs in Efficiency and Image Quality.

Authors:  Thomas W Loehfelm; Adam B Prater; Tequam Debebe; Aarti K Sekhar
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  Mobile devices and their prospective future role in emergency radiology.

Authors:  Timothy W O'Connell; Michael N Patlas
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease and Coronary Anomalies with a Handheld Smartphone.

Authors:  Cheng Ting Lin; Stefan Loy Zimmerman; Linda C Chu; John Eng; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  What Is the Best Way for Patients to Take Photographs of Medical Images (Radiographs, CT, and MRI) Using a Smartphone?

Authors:  Xiao-Jiang Yang; Wei Wei; Yang Zhang; Ya-Nan Wang; Nan Zhang; Tian-Qing Li; Tian-Cheng Ma; Ke-Ying Zhang; Ming-Chun Jiang; Zhen-Sheng Ma
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Diagnostic accuracy and reliability of smartphone captured radiologic images communicated via WhatsApp®.

Authors:  Unathi Ntja; Jacques Janse van Rensburg; Gina Joubert
Journal:  Afr J Emerg Med       Date:  2022-01-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.