Literature DB >> 21614654

Comparison between different cost devices for digital capture of X-ray films: an image characteristics detection approach.

Antonio José Salazar1, Juan Camilo Camacho, Diego Andrés Aguirre.   

Abstract

A common teleradiology practice is digitizing films. The costs of specialized digitizers are very high, that is why there is a trend to use conventional scanners and digital cameras. Statistical clinical studies are required to determine the accuracy of these devices, which are very difficult to carry out. The purpose of this study was to compare three capture devices in terms of their capacity to detect several image characteristics. Spatial resolution, contrast, gray levels, and geometric deformation were compared for a specialized digitizer ICR (US$ 15,000), a conventional scanner UMAX (US$ 1,800), and a digital camera LUMIX (US$ 450, but require an additional support system and a light box for about US$ 400). Test patterns printed in films were used. The results detected gray levels lower than real values for all three devices; acceptable contrast and low geometric deformation with three devices. All three devices are appropriate solutions, but a digital camera requires more operator training and more settings.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21614654      PMCID: PMC3264722          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-011-9391-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  19 in total

1.  Evaluation of a digital camera for acquiring radiographic images for telemedicine applications.

Authors:  E Krupinski; M Gonzales; C Gonzales; R S Weinstein
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.536

2.  Digitizing pediatric chest radiographs: comparison of low-cost, commercial off-the-shelf technologies.

Authors:  L Ruess; C F Uyehara; K C Shiels; K H Cho; S C O'Connor; D A Person; R K Whitton
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2001-12

3.  Sample size tables for receiver operating characteristic studies.

Authors:  N A Obuchowski
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Use of the SMPTE test pattern in picture archiving and communication systems.

Authors:  J E Gray
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  A comparative study of conventional mammography film interpretations with soft copy readings of the same examinations.

Authors:  Joseph N Gitlin; Anand K Narayan; Chad A Mitchell; Ali M Akmal; David J Eisner; Lindsy M Peterson; Daisy Nie; Tyler R McClintock
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Receiver operating characteristic analysis of chest image interpretation with conventional, laser-printed, and high-resolution workstation images.

Authors:  B S Slasky; D Gur; W F Good; M A Costa-Greco; K M Harris; L A Cooperstein; H E Rockette
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Test pattern for video displays and hard-copy cameras.

Authors:  J E Gray; K G Lisk; D H Haddick; J H Harshbarger; A Oosterhof; R Schwenker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Interpretation of subtle interstitial lung abnormalities: conventional versus storage phosphor radiography.

Authors:  S Kido; J Ikezoe; N Takeuchi; H Kondoh; N Tomiyama; T Jokoh; N Kohno; S Takashima; H Yamagami; H Naito
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Diagnostic accuracy of chest X-rays acquired using a digital camera for low-cost teleradiology.

Authors:  Agnieszka Szot; Francine L Jacobson; Samson Munn; Darius Jazayeri; Edward Nardell; David Harrison; Ralph Drosten; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Laura M Smeaton; Hamish S F Fraser
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.046

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of plain film radiographs between original film and smartphone capture: a pilot study.

Authors:  Mindy Y Licurse; Sung H Kim; Woojin Kim; Alexander T Ruutiainen; Tessa S Cook
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Evaluation of low-cost telemammography screening configurations: a comparison with film-screen readings in vulnerable areas.

Authors:  Antonio J Salazar; Javier Romero; Oscar Bernal; Angela Moreno; Sofía Velasco; Xavier Díaz
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Comparing the interpretation of traumatic chest x-ray by emergency medicine specialists and radiologists.

Authors:  Saeed Safari; Alireza Baratloo; Ahmed Said Negida; Morteza Sanei Taheri; Behrooz Hashemi; Samaneh Hosseini Selkisari
Journal:  Arch Trauma Res       Date:  2014-11-18

4.  A recommended method in order to interpret chest x-rays for diagnosing small size pneumothorax.

Authors:  Mohammad-Reza Ghane; Amin Saburi; Hamid-Reza Javadzadeh
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2013-01

5.  Digital radiology to improve the quality of care in countries with limited resources: a feasibility study from Angola.

Authors:  Floriana Zennaro; Joaquim António Oliveira Gomes; Armando Casalino; Magda Lonardi; Meta Starc; Pierpaolo Paoletti; Daniele Gobbo; Chiara Giusto; Tarcisio Not; Marzia Lazzerini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.