Literature DB >> 26689095

Mobile devices and their prospective future role in emergency radiology.

Timothy W O'Connell1, Michael N Patlas2.   

Abstract

Mobile devices, wireless networks and software have significantly evolved since the late 1990s and are now available with sufficient computing power, speed and complexity to allow real-time interpretation of radiology studies. Emergency radiology (ER)'s time-sensitive nature would seem to be an excellent match for study interpretation using mobile devices, allowing the radiologist to read studies anywhere, at any time. While suitable for use by the radiologist outside of the hospital, or clinicians and surgeons at the bedside or in the operating room, these devices do have limitations, and regulatory approval for in-hospital diagnostic use is limited. In the ER setting, we suggest that the best use of mobile devices is to be available to consult directly with patients about their imaging findings and to the clinical team during rounds and at handover. This will bring the radiologist to the clinician and patient, helping us to better understand the patient's presentation, educate both the physician and patient and increase the visibility and value of the radiologist as a member of the clinical care team.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26689095      PMCID: PMC4985455          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150820

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  11 in total

1.  PACS and radiology practice: enjoy the benefits but acknowledge the threats. Picture archiving and communications systems.

Authors:  S R Baker
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  A demonstration of instant pocket wireless CT teleradiology to facilitate stat neurosurgical consultation and future telemedicine implications.

Authors:  L G Yamamoto; D R Williams
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.469

3.  Emergency CT brain: preliminary interpretation with a tablet device: image quality and diagnostic performance of the Apple iPad.

Authors:  Patrick Mc Laughlin; Siobhan O Neill; Noel Fanning; Anne Marie Mc Garrigle; Owen J O Connor; Gerry Wyse; Michael M Maher
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2011-12-16

4.  Radiology's value chain.

Authors:  Dieter R Enzmann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  The iPad tablet computer for mobile on-call radiology diagnosis? Auditing discrepancy in CT and MRI reporting.

Authors:  Sindhu John; Angeline C C Poh; Tchoyoson C C Lim; Elizabeth H Y Chan; Le Roy Chong
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Value in radiology.

Authors:  Richard B Gunderman; Giles W L Boland
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of plain film radiographs between original film and smartphone capture: a pilot study.

Authors:  Mindy Y Licurse; Sung H Kim; Woojin Kim; Alexander T Ruutiainen; Tessa S Cook
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Renegotiating expertise: an examination of PACS and the challenges to radiology using a medical anthropologic approach.

Authors:  Allison Anne Tillack; Richard S Breiman
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.532

9.  Evaluation of personal digital assistants as an interpretation medium for computed tomography of patients with intracranial injury.

Authors:  Vahid Yaghmai; Sivaraja Kuppuswami; Jonathan W Berlin; Sean A Salehi
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2003-08-22

10.  An assessment of the iPad 2 as a CT teleradiology tool using brain CT with subtle intracranial hemorrhage under conventional illumination.

Authors:  Joon Bum Park; Hyuk Joong Choi; Jeong Hun Lee; Bo Seung Kang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.056

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Radiology, Mobile Devices, and Internet of Things (IoT).

Authors:  Supriya Gupta; Elizabeth M Johnson; Justin G Peacock; Liwei Jiang; Morgan P McBee; Michael B Sneider; Elizabeth A Krupinski
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  What Is the Best Way for Patients to Take Photographs of Medical Images (Radiographs, CT, and MRI) Using a Smartphone?

Authors:  Xiao-Jiang Yang; Wei Wei; Yang Zhang; Ya-Nan Wang; Nan Zhang; Tian-Qing Li; Tian-Cheng Ma; Ke-Ying Zhang; Ming-Chun Jiang; Zhen-Sheng Ma
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 3.  ESR paper on the proper use of mobile devices in radiology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2018-03-22

4.  Trends in radiology and experimental research.

Authors:  Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2017-06-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.