Literature DB >> 11310912

Comparison of radiographic image quality from four digitization devices as viewed on computer monitors.

H C Davidson1, D J Johnston, M E Christian, H R Harnsberger.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the quality of radiographic images digitized from commercial-grade and consumer-grade digital cameras and scanners as viewed on computer monitor. Radiographic images were digitized from hardcopy film using a commercial-grade laser scanner, a consumer-grade desktop flatbed scanner, a commercial-grade digital camera, and a consumer-grade digital camera. The quality of images without and with grayscale histogram adjustment was evaluated subjectively by 10 board-certified radiologists. Optical density response was evaluated objectively using a grayscale test pattern. There was no significant difference in subjective quality among images digitized with the commercial scanner, consumer scanner, and commercial camera. The quality of images digitized with the consumer camera was lower than the other 3. Objective tests showed the commercial scanner to have the most linear optical density response. For the purpose of viewing images on a computer monitor, a consumer-grade desktop scanner can produce images of similar quality to those produced by more expensive laser commercial-grade scanners and digital cameras and provides cost-efficient means to digitize radiographic plain films. A consumer-grade camera may not be optimal for use in this setting.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11310912      PMCID: PMC3489196          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-001-0021-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  4 in total

1.  How to optimize radiological images captured from digital cameras, using the Adobe Photoshop 6.0 program.

Authors:  A N Chalazonitis; D Koumarianos; J Tzovara; P Chronopoulos
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Our path to a filmless future.

Authors:  Luther Adair; Eric Ledermann
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of plain film radiographs between original film and smartphone capture: a pilot study.

Authors:  Mindy Y Licurse; Sung H Kim; Woojin Kim; Alexander T Ruutiainen; Tessa S Cook
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Diagnostic accuracy of digitized conventional radiographs by camera and scanner in detection of proximal caries.

Authors:  Solmaz Valizadeh; Mohammad Amin Tavakoli; Tara Zarabian; Farzad Esmaeili
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2009-12-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.