Literature DB >> 28560509

Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease and Coronary Anomalies with a Handheld Smartphone.

Cheng Ting Lin1, Stefan Loy Zimmerman2, Linda C Chu2, John Eng2, Elliot K Fishman2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of an iPhone for evaluation of the coronary arteries on coronary CT angiography (CTA) in comparison to a standard clinical workstation. Fifty coronary CTA exams were selected to include a range of normal and abnormal cases including both coronary artery disease (CAD) of varying severity and coronary artery anomalies. Two cardiac radiologists reviewed each exam on a standard clinical workstation initially and then on an iPhone 6 after a washout period. Coronary stenosis was evaluated on a 4-point scale and presence of coronary anomalies was recorded. Two additional cardiac radiologists reviewed all cases in consensus on the standard workstation and these results were used as the reference standard. When reader results were compared to the reference standard, there was no significant difference in agreement for per-vessel stenosis scores using either the iPhone or standard clinical workstation. The intraobserver intertechnology agreement on a per-vessel basis for obstructive CAD were 97.4% (299/307, kappa = 0.777) and 97.5% (317/325, kappa = 0.804) for the two readers. All cases of coronary anomalies were identified by both readers regardless of the device used. Coronary CTA examinations can be interpreted on a smartphone with diagnostic accuracy comparable to a standard workstation. 3D visualization app on the iPhone may facilitate urgent coronary CTA review when a workstation is not available.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary CT angiography; Coronary artery disease; Mobile; Smartphone; iPhone

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28560509      PMCID: PMC5681475          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-017-9982-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  17 in total

1.  Handheld device review of abdominal CT for the evaluation of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Asim F Choudhri; Thomas M Carr; Christopher P Ho; James R Stone; Spencer B Gay; Drew L Lambert
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Flexible image evaluation: iPad versus secondary-class monitors for review of MR spinal emergency cases, a comparative study.

Authors:  Jonathan P McNulty; John T Ryan; Michael G Evanoff; Louise A Rainford
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-04-14       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Diagnostic performance of 16- and 64-section spiral CT for coronary artery bypass graft assessment: meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michèle Hamon; Olivier Lepage; Patrizia Malagutti; John W Riddell; Rémy Morello; Denis Agostini; Martial Hamon
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of plain film radiographs between original film and smartphone capture: a pilot study.

Authors:  Mindy Y Licurse; Sung H Kim; Woojin Kim; Alexander T Ruutiainen; Tessa S Cook
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee.

Authors:  Jonathon Leipsic; Suhny Abbara; Stephan Achenbach; Ricardo Cury; James P Earls; Gb John Mancini; Koen Nieman; Gianluca Pontone; Gilbert L Raff
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2014-07-24

6.  Remote reading of coronary CTA exams using a tablet computer: utility for stenosis assessment and identification of coronary anomalies.

Authors:  Stefan L Zimmerman; Cheng T Lin; Linda C Chu; John Eng; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-04-16

7.  Technology-Assisted Virtual Consultation for Medical Imaging.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Jason Sherwin; Chandan P Prithiani; Dana Ostrow; Michael P Recht
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 5.532

8.  The iPad as a mobile device for CT display and interpretation: diagnostic accuracy for identification of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Pamela T Johnson; Stefan L Zimmerman; David Heath; John Eng; Karen M Horton; William W Scott; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2012-03-27

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography as interpreted on a mobile handheld phone device.

Authors:  Troy M LaBounty; Robert J Kim; Fay Y Lin; Matthew J Budoff; Jonathan W Weinsaft; James K Min
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-05

10.  64-Channel cardiac computed tomography: intraobserver and interobserver variability (part 1): coronary angiography.

Authors:  Edward D Nicol; James Stirrup; Michael Roughton; Simon P G Padley; Michael B Rubens
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.