Literature DB >> 15653247

Development and validation of a Breast Cancer Genetic Counseling Knowledge Questionnaire.

Joel Erblich1, Karen Brown, Youngmee Kim, Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir, Barbara E Livingston, Dana H Bovbjerg.   

Abstract

Women who undergo genetic counseling concerning their increased risk of developing breast cancer confront large quantities of complex information in a short period of time. Clinical reports have suggested that many women may not retain what they learned during counseling. A validated questionnaire to measure their knowledge, however, is lacking. In this study, we describe the development and validation of a questionnaire to assess knowledge of information typically included in genetic counseling for breast cancer. Items were empirically derived from detailed content analyses of actual genetic counseling sessions. The instrument's content validity was high, as evidenced by high levels of independent interrater agreement (0.93) on items. Subsequent data reduction and confirmatory factor analytic techniques yielded a highly reliable (alpha = 0.92) 27-item Breast Cancer Genetic Counseling Knowledge Questionnaire (BGKQ). Direct comparison of this questionnaire to a scale previously developed in the literature (BCHK; [Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 53 (1999) 69]) supported the utility of the new questionnaire for evaluation of knowledge after counseling. Compared to non-counseled groups (n = 45), women who had undergone genetic counseling (n = 28) scored significantly higher (P < 0.0001) on the BGKQ, but not on the other questionnaire, establishing the BGKQ's criterion validity. The BGKQ may, thus, provide a useful clinical and research tool for assessing knowledge of information provided during genetic counseling and exploring the potential impact of distress on knowledge, as well as the impact of knowledge on screening behaviors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15653247     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  27 in total

1.  Randomized Trial of Telegenetics vs. In-Person Cancer Genetic Counseling: Cost, Patient Satisfaction and Attendance.

Authors:  Adam H Buchanan; Santanu K Datta; Celette Sugg Skinner; Gail P Hollowell; Henry F Beresford; Thomas Freeland; Benjamin Rogers; John Boling; P Kelly Marcom; Martha B Adams
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Assessment of psychosocial outcomes in genetic counseling research: an overview of available measurement scales.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Claire E Wakefield; Bettina Meiser
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  The Role of Knowledge on Genetic Counseling and Testing in Black Cancer Survivors at Increased Risk of Carrying a BRCA1/2 Mutation.

Authors:  Alejandra Hurtado-de-Mendoza; Monica C Jackson; Lyndsay Anderson; Vanessa B Sheppard
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Randomized noninferiority trial of telephone versus in-person genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Marc D Schwartz; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Beth N Peshkin; Jeanne Mandelblatt; Rachel Nusbaum; An-Tsun Huang; Yaojen Chang; Kristi Graves; Claudine Isaacs; Marie Wood; Wendy McKinnon; Judy Garber; Shelley McCormick; Anita Y Kinney; George Luta; Sarah Kelleher; Kara-Grace Leventhal; Patti Vegella; Angie Tong; Lesley King
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Patient and genetic counselor perceptions of in-person versus telephone genetic counseling for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Aryana S Jacobs; Marc D Schwartz; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Rachel H Nusbaum; Gillian W Hooker; Tiffani A DeMarco; Jessica E Heinzmann; Wendy McKinnon; Shelley R McCormick; Claire Davis; Andrea D Forman; Alexandra Perez Lebensohn; Emily Dalton; Diana Moglia Tully; Kristi D Graves; Morgan Similuk; Scott Kelly; Beth N Peshkin
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Research Participants' Preferences for Hypothetical Secondary Results from Genomic Research.

Authors:  Julia Wynn; Josue Martinez; Jimmy Duong; Codruta Chiuzan; Jo C Phelan; Abby Fyer; Robert L Klitzman; Paul S Appelbaum; Wendy K Chung
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  User engagement with web-based genomics education videos and implications for designing scalable patient education materials.

Authors:  Julia Wynn; Wei Wei; Xinhang Li; Yat S So; Suzanne Bakken; Chunhua Weng; Wendy K Chung
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2020-03-04

8.  Impact of Receiving Secondary Results from Genomic Research: A 12-Month Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Julia Wynn; Josue Martinez; Jessica Bulafka; Jimmy Duong; Yuan Zhang; Codruta Chiuzan; Jain Preti; Maria L Cremona; Vaidehi Jobanputra; Abby J Fyer; Robert L Klitzman; Paul S Appelbaum; Wendy K Chung
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Factors influencing posttraumatic growth in ovarian cancer survivors.

Authors:  Jeong Min Oh; Yoonjung Kim; Yeunhee Kwak
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Patient Perceptions of Telephone vs. In-Person BRCA1/BRCA2 Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Beth N Peshkin; Scott Kelly; Rachel H Nusbaum; Morgan Similuk; Tiffani A DeMarco; Gillian W Hooker; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Andrea D Forman; Jessica Rispoli Joines; Claire Davis; Shelley R McCormick; Wendy McKinnon; Kristi D Graves; Claudine Isaacs; Judy Garber; Marie Wood; Lina Jandorf; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.