Literature DB >> 3352332

Methods for measuring patient satisfaction with specific medical encounters.

J E Ware1, R D Hays.   

Abstract

This paper presents the results of two studies that compared methods for measuring patient satisfaction with specific medical encounters. One form used six-point response scales ranging from "very satisfied" to "very dissatisfied" (S6 scale); the other used five-point scales ranging from "excellent" to "poor" (E5 scale). Forms were assigned randomly to outpatients in fee-for-service (N = 136) and prepaid systems of care (N = 363) and were compared in terms of response variability, reliability, and validity. In both studies, the E5 scales showed greater response variability and better predicted whether patients intended to return to the same doctor in the future, recommend the doctor to a friend, and comply with the medical regimen. Reliability was satisfactory and did not differ between methods. Results are discussed in terms of their implications for constructing visit-specific satisfaction rating scales.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3352332     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198804000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  103 in total

1.  Measuring satisfaction among low-income women: a prenatal care questionnaire.

Authors:  K Raube; A Handler; D Rosenberg
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1998-03

2.  Relationships among Internet health information use, patient behavior and self efficacy in newly diagnosed cancer patients who contact the National Cancer Institute's NCI Atlantic Region Cancer Information Service (CIS).

Authors:  Linda Fleisher; Sarah Bass; Sheryl Burt Ruzek; Nancy McKeown-Conn
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2002

3.  A brief survey to identify priorities for improving clinician recruitment and retention: results from Hawai'i Island physicians.

Authors:  Karen L Pellegrin
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2012-04

4.  Randomized Trial of Telegenetics vs. In-Person Cancer Genetic Counseling: Cost, Patient Satisfaction and Attendance.

Authors:  Adam H Buchanan; Santanu K Datta; Celette Sugg Skinner; Gail P Hollowell; Henry F Beresford; Thomas Freeland; Benjamin Rogers; John Boling; P Kelly Marcom; Martha B Adams
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  The contribution of pain-related anxiety to disability from headache.

Authors:  Justin M Nash; David M Williams; Robert Nicholson; Peter C Trask
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2006-01-06

Review 6.  Instruments for measuring patient satisfaction with pharmacy services in the spanish language.

Authors:  María Luz Traverso; Linda D MacKeigan
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2005-08

7.  A guide to direct measures of patient satisfaction in clinical practice. Health Services Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-05-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 8.  Patient assessment of treatment satisfaction: methods and practical issues.

Authors:  D A Revicki
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Are older patients more satisfied with hospital care than younger patients?

Authors:  C Komal Jaipaul; Gary E Rosenthal
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Race/ethnicity and patient satisfaction. Using the appropriate method to test for perceived differences in care.

Authors:  Donald A Barr
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.