Literature DB >> 25828399

Origin, evolution, and population genetics of the selfish Segregation Distorter gene duplication in European and African populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Cara L Brand1, Amanda M Larracuente2, Daven C Presgraves2.   

Abstract

Meiotic drive elements are a special class of evolutionarily "selfish genes" that subvert Mendelian segregation to gain preferential transmission at the expense of homologous loci. Many drive elements appear to be maintained in populations as stable polymorphisms, their equilibrium frequencies determined by the balance between drive (increasing frequency) and selection (decreasing frequency). Here we show that a classic, seemingly balanced, drive system is instead characterized by frequent evolutionary turnover giving rise to dynamic, rather than stable, equilibrium frequencies. The autosomal Segregation Distorter (SD) system of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is a selfish coadapted meiotic drive gene complex in which the major driver corresponds to a partial duplication of the gene Ran-GTPase activating protein (RanGAP). SD chromosomes segregate at similar, low frequencies of 1-5% in natural populations worldwide, consistent with a balanced polymorphism. Surprisingly, our population genetic analyses reveal evidence for parallel, independent selective sweeps of different SD chromosomes in populations on different continents. These findings suggest that, rather than persisting at a single stable equilibrium, SD chromosomes turn over frequently within populations.
© 2015 The Author(s). Evolution published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila melanogaster; gene complex; meiotic drive; segregation distortion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25828399      PMCID: PMC8108122          DOI: 10.1111/evo.12658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  44 in total

1.  On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination.

Authors:  G A Watterson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data.

Authors:  P Librado; J Rozas
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Rapid evolution of a coadapted gene complex: evidence from the Segregation Distorter (SD) system of meiotic drive in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M F Palopoli; C I Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Population Dynamics of the Segregation Distorter Polymorphism of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  B Charlesworth; D L Hartl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Genetic dissection of segregation distortion II. Mechanism of suppression of distortion by certain inversions.

Authors:  D L Hartl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Cheaters sometimes prosper: distortion of mendelian segregation by meiotic drive.

Authors:  T W Lyttle
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 11.639

7.  Genetic conflict and sex chromosome evolution.

Authors:  Colin D Meiklejohn; Yun Tao
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  On the components of segregation distortion in Drosophila melanogaster. V. Molecular analysis of the Sd locus.

Authors:  P A Powers; B Ganetzky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Inferring the demographic history and rate of adaptive substitution in Drosophila.

Authors:  Haipeng Li; Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Large-scale selective sweep among Segregation Distorter chromosomes in African populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Daven C Presgraves; Pierre R Gérard; Anjuli Cherukuri; Terrence W Lyttle
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  18 in total

1.  A Pooled Sequencing Approach Identifies a Candidate Meiotic Driver in Drosophila.

Authors:  Kevin H-C Wei; Hemakumar M Reddy; Chandramouli Rathnam; Jimin Lee; Deanna Lin; Shuqing Ji; James M Mason; Andrew G Clark; Daniel A Barbash
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  A fast-evolving X-linked duplicate of importin-α2 is overexpressed in sex-ratio drive in Drosophila neotestacea.

Authors:  Kathleen E Pieper; Robert L Unckless; Kelly A Dyer
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  An X-linked meiotic drive allele has strong, recessive fitness costs in female Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  William Larner; Tom Price; Luke Holman; Nina Wedell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Meiotic drive mechanisms: lessons from Drosophila.

Authors:  Cécile Courret; Ching-Ho Chang; Kevin H-C Wei; Catherine Montchamp-Moreau; Amanda M Larracuente
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Analysis of a Strong Suppressor of Segregation Distorter in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Rayla Greenberg Temin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Supergene potential of a selfish centromere.

Authors:  Findley Finseth; Keely Brown; Andrew Demaree; Lila Fishman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 6.671

Review 7.  Resistance to natural and synthetic gene drive systems.

Authors:  Tom A R Price; Nikolai Windbichler; Robert L Unckless; Andreas Sutter; Jan-Niklas Runge; Perran A Ross; Andrew Pomiankowski; Nicole L Nuckolls; Catherine Montchamp-Moreau; Nicole Mideo; Oliver Y Martin; Andri Manser; Mathieu Legros; Amanda M Larracuente; Luke Holman; John Godwin; Neil Gemmell; Cécile Courret; Anna Buchman; Luke G Barrett; Anna K Lindholm
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 2.411

8.  Occasional recombination of a selfish X-chromosome may permit its persistence at high frequencies in the wild.

Authors:  K E Pieper; K A Dyer
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 2.411

9.  Selfing is the safest sex for Caenorhabditis tropicalis.

Authors:  Luke M Noble; John Yuen; Lewis Stevens; Nicolas Moya; Riaad Persaud; Marc Moscatelli; Jacqueline L Jackson; Gaotian Zhang; Rojin Chitrakar; L Ryan Baugh; Christian Braendle; Erik C Andersen; Hannah S Seidel; Matthew V Rockman
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Sexual selection can partly explain low frequencies of Segregation Distorter alleles.

Authors:  Thomas A Keaney; Therésa M Jones; Luke Holman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 5.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.