Literature DB >> 31771473

An X-linked meiotic drive allele has strong, recessive fitness costs in female Drosophila pseudoobscura.

William Larner1, Tom Price2, Luke Holman3, Nina Wedell1.   

Abstract

Selfish 'meiotic drive' alleles are transmitted to more than 50% of offspring, allowing them to rapidly invade populations even if they reduce the fitness of individuals carrying them. Theory predicts that drivers should either fix or go extinct, yet some drivers defy these predictions by persisting at low, stable frequencies for decades. One possible explanation for this discrepancy is that drivers are especially costly when homozygous, although empirical tests of this idea are rare and equivocal. Here, we measure the fitness of female Drosophila pseudoobscura carrying zero, one or two copies of the X-linked driver sex ratio (SR). SR had strong negative effects on female offspring production and the probability of reproductive failure, and these effects were largely similar across four genetic backgrounds. SR was especially costly when homozygous. We used our fitness measurements to parametrize a population genetic model, and found that the female fitness costs observed here can explain the puzzlingly low allele frequency of SR in nature. We also use the model to show how spatial variation in female mating behaviour, fitness costs of SR and the reduced siring success of SR males can jointly explain the north-south cline in SR frequencies across North America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  negative frequency dependence; offspring production; polyandry; selfish genetic elements; sperm competition

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31771473      PMCID: PMC6939274          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  33 in total

Review 1.  Isofemale lines in Drosophila: an empirical approach to quantitative trait analysis in natural populations.

Authors:  J R David; P Gibert; H Legout; G Pétavy; P Capy; B Moreteau
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Persistence of an extreme sex-ratio bias in a natural population.

Authors:  Emily A Dyson; Gregory D D Hurst
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Local selection underlies the geographic distribution of sex-ratio drive in Drosophila neotestacea.

Authors:  Kelly A Dyer
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  MALE SEGREGATION RATIO ADVANTAGE AS A FACTOR IN MAINTAINING LETHAL ALLELES IN WILD POPULATIONS OF HOUSE MICE.

Authors:  D Bruck
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1957-01-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Geographical Distribution and Cytology of "Sex Ratio" in Drosophila Pseudoobscura and Related Species.

Authors:  A H Sturtevant; T Dobzhansky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1936-07       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Origin, evolution, and population genetics of the selfish Segregation Distorter gene duplication in European and African populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Cara L Brand; Amanda M Larracuente; Daven C Presgraves
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Sexual antagonism and meiotic drive cause stable linkage disequilibrium and favour reduced recombination on the X chromosome.

Authors:  W T Rydzewski; S A Carioscia; G Liévano; V D Lynch; M M Patten
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 2.411

8.  Meiotic drive reduces egg-to-adult viability in stalk-eyed flies.

Authors:  Sam Ronan Finnegan; Nathan Joseph White; Dixon Koh; M Florencia Camus; Kevin Fowler; Andrew Pomiankowski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Anaesthetising Drosophila for behavioural studies.

Authors:  A B. Barron
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.354

Review 10.  Putting the brake on drive: meiotic drive of t haplotypes in natural populations of mice.

Authors:  K G Ardlie
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 11.639

View more
  6 in total

1.  X-linked meiotic drive can boost population size and persistence.

Authors:  Carl Mackintosh; Andrew Pomiankowski; Michael F Scott
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Gene drive: progress and prospects.

Authors:  N Wedell; T A R Price; A K Lindholm
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Resistance to natural and synthetic gene drive systems.

Authors:  Tom A R Price; Nikolai Windbichler; Robert L Unckless; Andreas Sutter; Jan-Niklas Runge; Perran A Ross; Andrew Pomiankowski; Nicole L Nuckolls; Catherine Montchamp-Moreau; Nicole Mideo; Oliver Y Martin; Andri Manser; Mathieu Legros; Amanda M Larracuente; Luke Holman; John Godwin; Neil Gemmell; Cécile Courret; Anna Buchman; Luke G Barrett; Anna K Lindholm
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 2.411

4.  Sexual selection can partly explain low frequencies of Segregation Distorter alleles.

Authors:  Thomas A Keaney; Therésa M Jones; Luke Holman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 5.530

5.  Ancient gene drives: an evolutionary paradox.

Authors:  T A R Price; R Verspoor; N Wedell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Extensive Recombination Suppression and Epistatic Selection Causes Chromosome-Wide Differentiation of a Selfish Sex Chromosome in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  Zachary L Fuller; Spencer A Koury; Christopher J Leonard; Randee E Young; Kobe Ikegami; Jonathan Westlake; Stephen Richards; Stephen W Schaeffer; Nitin Phadnis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 4.562

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.