Literature DB >> 27423061

Occasional recombination of a selfish X-chromosome may permit its persistence at high frequencies in the wild.

K E Pieper1, K A Dyer2.   

Abstract

The sex-ratio X-chromosome (SR) is a selfish chromosome that promotes its own transmission to the next generation by destroying Y-bearing sperm in the testes of carrier males. In some natural populations of the fly Drosophila neotestacea, up to 30% of the X-chromosomes are SR chromosomes. To investigate the molecular evolutionary history and consequences of SR, we sequenced SR and standard (ST) males at 11 X-linked loci that span the ST X-chromosome and at seven arbitrarily chosen autosomal loci from a sample of D. neotestacea males from throughout the species range. We found that the evolutionary relationship between ST and SR varies among individual markers, but genetic differentiation between SR and ST is chromosome-wide and likely due to large chromosomal inversions that suppress recombination. However, SR does not consist of a single multilocus haplotype: we find evidence for gene flow between ST and SR at every locus assayed. Furthermore, we do not find long-distance linkage disequilibrium within SR chromosomes, suggesting that recombination occurs in females homozygous for SR. Finally, polymorphism on SR is reduced compared to that on ST, and loci displaying signatures of selection on ST do not show similar patterns on SR. Thus, even if selection is less effective on SR, our results suggest that gene flow with ST and recombination between SR chromosomes may prevent the accumulation of deleterious mutations and allow its long-term persistence at relatively high frequencies.
© 2016 European Society For Evolutionary Biology. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2016 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Drosophila neotestaceazzm321990; genetic conflict; meiotic drive; molecular evolution; sex chromosome evolution; sex-ratio drive

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27423061      PMCID: PMC5089913          DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  51 in total

Review 1.  Inversion polymorphisms and nucleotide variability in Drosophila.

Authors:  P Andolfatto; F Depaulis; A Navarro
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination.

Authors:  G A Watterson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 1.570

3.  Association of polyandry and sex-ratio drive prevalence in natural populations of Drosophila neotestacea.

Authors:  Cheryl A Pinzone; Kelly A Dyer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The estimation of the number and the length distribution of gene conversion tracts from population DNA sequence data.

Authors:  E Betrán; J Rozas; A Navarro; A Barbadilla
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Rapid evolution of a Y-chromosome heterochromatin protein underlies sex chromosome meiotic drive.

Authors:  Quentin Helleu; Pierre R Gérard; Raphaëlle Dubruille; David Ogereau; Benjamin Prud'homme; Benjamin Loppin; Catherine Montchamp-Moreau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Population Dynamics of the Segregation Distorter Polymorphism of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  B Charlesworth; D L Hartl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Revisiting the Impact of Inversions in Evolution: From Population Genetic Markers to Drivers of Adaptive Shifts and Speciation?

Authors:  Ary A Hoffmann; Loren H Rieseberg
Journal:  Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 13.915

9.  Chromosomal speciation and molecular divergence--accelerated evolution in rearranged chromosomes.

Authors:  Arcadi Navarro; Nick H Barton
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Genome-wide patterns of latitudinal differentiation among populations of Drosophila melanogaster from North America.

Authors:  Daniel K Fabian; Martin Kapun; Viola Nolte; Robert Kofler; Paul S Schmidt; Christian Schlötterer; Thomas Flatt
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 6.185

View more
  12 in total

1.  Fitness Costs and Variation in Transmission Distortion Associated with the Abnormal Chromosome 10 Meiotic Drive System in Maize.

Authors:  David M Higgins; Elizabeth G Lowry; Lisa B Kanizay; Philip W Becraft; David W Hall; R Kelly Dawe
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  A fast-evolving X-linked duplicate of importin-α2 is overexpressed in sex-ratio drive in Drosophila neotestacea.

Authors:  Kathleen E Pieper; Robert L Unckless; Kelly A Dyer
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  Meiotic drive mechanisms: lessons from Drosophila.

Authors:  Cécile Courret; Ching-Ho Chang; Kevin H-C Wei; Catherine Montchamp-Moreau; Amanda M Larracuente
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Contrasting patterns of X-chromosome divergence underlie multiple sex-ratio polymorphisms in stalk-eyed flies.

Authors:  K A Paczolt; J A Reinhardt; G S Wilkinson
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 2.411

5.  Atypical meiosis can be adaptive in outcrossed Schizosaccharomyces pombe due to wtf meiotic drivers.

Authors:  María Angélica Bravo Núñez; Ibrahim M Sabbarini; Lauren E Eide; Robert L Unckless; Sarah E Zanders
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Complex History and Differentiation Patterns of the t-Haplotype, a Mouse Meiotic Driver.

Authors:  Reka K Kelemen; Beatriz Vicoso
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Convergent evolution of complex genomic rearrangements in two fungal meiotic drive elements.

Authors:  Jesper Svedberg; Sara Hosseini; Jun Chen; Aaron A Vogan; Iva Mozgova; Lars Hennig; Pennapa Manitchotpisit; Anna Abusharekh; Thomas M Hammond; Martin Lascoux; Hanna Johannesson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Unexpected patterns of segregation distortion at a selfish supergene in the fire ant Solenopsis invicta.

Authors:  Kenneth G Ross; DeWayne Shoemaker
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 2.797

9.  An assessment of the immune costs associated with meiotic drive elements in Drosophila.

Authors:  Jenna Kay Lea; Robert L Unckless
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Extensive Recombination Suppression and Epistatic Selection Causes Chromosome-Wide Differentiation of a Selfish Sex Chromosome in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  Zachary L Fuller; Spencer A Koury; Christopher J Leonard; Randee E Young; Kobe Ikegami; Jonathan Westlake; Stephen Richards; Stephen W Schaeffer; Nitin Phadnis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.