Literature DB >> 25825986

Preventing Unintended Pregnancy: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project in Review.

Natalia E Birgisson1, Qiuhong Zhao, Gina M Secura, Tessa Madden, Jeffrey F Peipert.   

Abstract

The Contraceptive CHOICE Project (CHOICE) sought to reduce unintended pregnancies in the St. Louis Region by removing cost, education, and access barriers to highly effective contraception. CHOICE was a prospective cohort study of over 9,000 women 14-45 years of age who received tiered contraceptive counseling to increase awareness of all reversible methods available, particularly long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods. Participants were provided with contraception of their choice at no cost for 2-3 years. We studied contraceptive method choice, continuation, and population outcomes of repeat abortion and teen pregnancy. Seventy-five percent of study participants chose one of the three LARC methods (46% levonorgestrel intrauterine system, 12% copper intrauterine device, and 17% subdermal implant). LARC users reported greater continuation than non-LARC users at 12 months (87% versus 57%) and 24 months (77% versus 41%). In our cohort, LARC methods were 20 times more effective than non-LARC methods. As a result, we observed a reduction in the percent of repeat abortions from 2006 to 2010 in St. Louis compared with Kansas City and nonmetropolitan Missouri and found substantial reductions in teen pregnancy, birth, and abortion (34.0, 19.4, and 9.7 per 1000 teens, respectively) compared with national rates among sexually experienced teens (158.5, 94.0, and 41.5 per 1000, respectively). Improved access to LARC methods can result in fewer unintended pregnancies and abortions and considerable cost savings to the health care system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25825986      PMCID: PMC4441000          DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  22 in total

Review 1.  Abortion and maternal health.

Authors:  P S Bernstein; A Rosenfield
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.561

2.  Nepal survey shows that "family planning saves lives".

Authors:  N Y Luther; S Thapa; S B Westley
Journal:  Asia Pac Pop Policy       Date:  1999-04

3.  Characteristics associated with discontinuation of long-acting reversible contraception within the first 6 months of use.

Authors:  Danielle S Grunloh; Teya Casner; Gina M Secura; Jeffrey F Peipert; Tessa Madden
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Family planning as a cost-saving preventive health service.

Authors:  Kelly Cleland; Jeffrey F Peipert; Carolyn Westhoff; Scott Spear; James Trussell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Reproductive health/family planning and the health of infants, girls and women.

Authors:  N Sadik
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.967

6.  Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  Brooke Winner; Jeffrey F Peipert; Qiuhong Zhao; Christina Buckel; Tessa Madden; Jenifer E Allsworth; Gina M Secura
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  Gina M Secura; Jenifer E Allsworth; Tessa Madden; Jennifer L Mullersman; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Continuation and satisfaction of reversible contraception.

Authors:  Jeffrey F Peipert; Qiuhong Zhao; Jenifer E Allsworth; Emiko Petrosky; Tessa Madden; David Eisenberg; Gina Secura
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Cost effectiveness of contraceptives in the United States.

Authors:  James Trussell; Anjana M Lalla; Quan V Doan; Eileen Reyes; Lionel Pinto; Joseph Gricar
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  Changes in use of long-acting contraceptive methods in the United States, 2007-2009.

Authors:  Lawrence B Finer; Jenna Jerman; Megan L Kavanaugh
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  31 in total

Review 1.  The role of decidual cells in uterine hemostasis, menstruation, inflammation, adverse pregnancy outcomes and abnormal uterine bleeding.

Authors:  Frederick Schatz; Ozlem Guzeloglu-Kayisli; Sefa Arlier; Umit A Kayisli; Charles J Lockwood
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 15.610

2.  Closing the Gap between Need and Uptake: a Case for Proactive Contraception Provision to Adolescents.

Authors:  Rebecca Duncan; Lynley Anderson; Neil Pickering
Journal:  Asian Bioeth Rev       Date:  2019-04-02

3.  Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Single-Dose Tenofovir Vaginal Film and Gel Formulation (FAME 05).

Authors:  Jennifer A Robinson; Mark A Marzinke; Edward J Fuchs; Rahul P Bakshi; Hans M L Spiegel; Jenell S Coleman; Lisa C Rohan; Craig W Hendrix
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.731

4.  Diagnosis and Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in Adolescent Girls.

Authors:  Erin Lanzo; Maria Monge; Maria Trent
Journal:  Pediatr Ann       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.132

5.  Changes to Contraceptive Method Use at Title X Clinics Following Delaware Contraceptive Access Now, 2008-2017.

Authors:  Michel Boudreaux; Liyang Xie; Yoon Sun Choi; Dylan Habeeb Roby; Michael S Rendall
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 6.  Pipeline for contraceptive development.

Authors:  Diana L Blithe
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Contraceptive Practices, Preferences, and Barriers Among Abortion Clients in North Carolina.

Authors:  Amy G Bryant; Ilene S Speizer; Jennifer C Hodgkinson; Alison Swiatlo; Siân L Curtis; Krista Perreira
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 0.954

8.  State-Identified Implementation Strategies to Increase Uptake of Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Policies.

Authors:  Charlan D Kroelinger; Isabel A Morgan; Carla L DeSisto; Cameron Estrich; Lisa F Waddell; Christine Mackie; Ellen Pliska; David A Goodman; Shanna Cox; Alisa Velonis; Kristin M Rankin
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  Insurance Plan Adherence to Mandate for Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives in a Large Pediatric Hospital Network.

Authors:  Katie Magoon; Claire Beamish; Nadia Dowshen; Aletha Akers
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 1.814

10.  Perceptions matter: Narratives of contraceptive implant robbery in Cape Town, South Africa.

Authors:  Emily A Krogstad; Millicent Atujuna; Elizabeth T Montgomery; Alexandra M Minnis; Chelsea Morroni; Linda-Gail Bekker
Journal:  Cult Health Sex       Date:  2020-03-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.