Jennifer A Robinson1, Mark A Marzinke1,2, Edward J Fuchs1, Rahul P Bakshi1, Hans M L Spiegel3, Jenell S Coleman, Lisa C Rohan4,5, Craig W Hendrix1. 1. Medicine (Clinical Pharmacology). 2. Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. 3. Kelly Government Solutions, Contractor to Division of AIDS, PMPRB/Prevention Sciences Program, Division of AIDS, NIAID, NIH, Rockville, MD. 4. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. 5. Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Although preexposure prophylaxis with oral tenofovir (TFV) disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine reduces HIV acquisition rates, poor adherence to and acceptability of daily vaginal gels have led to development of vaginal film formulations to improve adherence and, potentially, to enable episodic use. STUDY DESIGN: In this 2-arm, cross-over study of a fast-dissolving tenofovir film (40 mg) compared with a previously studied semisolid tenofovir 1% gel (40 mg), 10 healthy women received a single vaginal dose of each study product. Clinical, pharmacokinetic, and antiviral assessments were performed over 1 week after dose. RESULTS: Nine of 10 participants experienced mild to moderate adverse effects, similar between products, with no severe adverse events or events attributed to study products. TFV concentrations after film dosing exceeded concentrations after gel dosing in plasma between 8 and 24 hours (P ≤ 0.02). TFV concentrations in cervicovaginal fluid and both TFV and TFV diphosphate concentrations in cervical tissue homogenates were higher after film dosing (all P values < 0.04). The differences ranged from median (interquartile range) 2.9-fold (1.1, 9.0; midvaginal cervicovaginal fluid) to 4.4-fold (2.9, 7.7; plasma). Neither film nor gel demonstrated reduced cervical tissuebiopsy infectivity after ex vivo HIV challenge. CONCLUSION: Single-dose tenofovir film demonstrated consistently higher concentrations in plasma and cervicovaginal samples when compared with gel during the first day after dosing. Single-dose cervical tissue TFV-diphosphate concentrations at 5 hours exceeded steady-state concentrations previously reported with daily oral Truvada dosing. Tenofovir film may provide an alternative to tenofovir oral and gel formulations. Clinical efficacy remains to be tested.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Although preexposure prophylaxis with oral tenofovir (TFV) disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine reduces HIV acquisition rates, poor adherence to and acceptability of daily vaginal gels have led to development of vaginal film formulations to improve adherence and, potentially, to enable episodic use. STUDY DESIGN: In this 2-arm, cross-over study of a fast-dissolving tenofovir film (40 mg) compared with a previously studied semisolid tenofovir 1% gel (40 mg), 10 healthy women received a single vaginal dose of each study product. Clinical, pharmacokinetic, and antiviral assessments were performed over 1 week after dose. RESULTS: Nine of 10 participants experienced mild to moderate adverse effects, similar between products, with no severe adverse events or events attributed to study products. TFV concentrations after film dosing exceeded concentrations after gel dosing in plasma between 8 and 24 hours (P ≤ 0.02). TFV concentrations in cervicovaginal fluid and both TFV and TFV diphosphate concentrations in cervical tissue homogenates were higher after film dosing (all P values < 0.04). The differences ranged from median (interquartile range) 2.9-fold (1.1, 9.0; midvaginal cervicovaginal fluid) to 4.4-fold (2.9, 7.7; plasma). Neither film nor gel demonstrated reduced cervical tissue biopsy infectivity after ex vivo HIV challenge. CONCLUSION: Single-dose tenofovir film demonstrated consistently higher concentrations in plasma and cervicovaginal samples when compared with gel during the first day after dosing. Single-dose cervical tissue TFV-diphosphate concentrations at 5 hours exceeded steady-state concentrations previously reported with daily oral Truvada dosing. Tenofovir film may provide an alternative to tenofovir oral and gel formulations. Clinical efficacy remains to be tested.
Authors: Quarraisha Abdool Karim; Salim S Abdool Karim; Janet A Frohlich; Anneke C Grobler; Cheryl Baxter; Leila E Mansoor; Ayesha B M Kharsany; Sengeziwe Sibeko; Koleka P Mlisana; Zaheen Omar; Tanuja N Gengiah; Silvia Maarschalk; Natasha Arulappan; Mukelisiwe Mlotshwa; Lynn Morris; Douglas Taylor Journal: Science Date: 2010-07-19 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Peter L Anderson; David V Glidden; Albert Liu; Susan Buchbinder; Javier R Lama; Juan Vicente Guanira; Vanessa McMahan; Lane R Bushman; Martín Casapía; Orlando Montoya-Herrera; Valdilea G Veloso; Kenneth H Mayer; Suwat Chariyalertsak; Mauro Schechter; Linda-Gail Bekker; Esper Georges Kallás; Robert M Grant Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2012-09-12 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: James E Cummins; Jeannette Guarner; Lisa Flowers; Patricia C Guenthner; Jeanine Bartlett; Timothy Morken; Lisa A Grohskopf; Lynn Paxton; Charlene S Dezzutti Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2007-03-12 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Michael C Thigpen; Poloko M Kebaabetswe; Lynn A Paxton; Dawn K Smith; Charles E Rose; Tebogo M Segolodi; Faith L Henderson; Sonal R Pathak; Fatma A Soud; Kata L Chillag; Rodreck Mutanhaurwa; Lovemore Ian Chirwa; Michael Kasonde; Daniel Abebe; Evans Buliva; Roman J Gvetadze; Sandra Johnson; Thom Sukalac; Vasavi T Thomas; Clyde Hart; Jeffrey A Johnson; C Kevin Malotte; Craig W Hendrix; John T Brooks Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-07-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jared M Baeten; Deborah Donnell; Patrick Ndase; Nelly R Mugo; James D Campbell; Jonathan Wangisi; Jordan W Tappero; Elizabeth A Bukusi; Craig R Cohen; Elly Katabira; Allan Ronald; Elioda Tumwesigye; Edwin Were; Kenneth H Fife; James Kiarie; Carey Farquhar; Grace John-Stewart; Aloysious Kakia; Josephine Odoyo; Akasiima Mucunguzi; Edith Nakku-Joloba; Rogers Twesigye; Kenneth Ngure; Cosmas Apaka; Harrison Tamooh; Fridah Gabona; Andrew Mujugira; Dana Panteleeff; Katherine K Thomas; Lara Kidoguchi; Meighan Krows; Jennifer Revall; Susan Morrison; Harald Haugen; Mira Emmanuel-Ogier; Lisa Ondrejcek; Robert W Coombs; Lisa Frenkel; Craig Hendrix; Namandjé N Bumpus; David Bangsberg; Jessica E Haberer; Wendy S Stevens; Jairam R Lingappa; Connie Celum Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-07-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Craig W Hendrix; Adriana Andrade; Namandjé N Bumpus; Angela D Kashuba; Mark A Marzinke; Ayana Moore; Peter L Anderson; Lane R Bushman; Edward J Fuchs; Ilene Wiggins; Christine Radebaugh; Heather A Prince; Rahul P Bakshi; Ruili Wang; Paul Richardson; Eugenie Shieh; Laura McKinstry; Xin Li; Deborah Donnell; Vanessa Elharrar; Kenneth H Mayer; Kristine B Patterson Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2015-10-15 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Marla J Keller; Rebecca P Madan; N Merna Torres; Melissa J Fazzari; Sylvia Cho; Sabah Kalyoussef; Gail Shust; Pedro M M Mesquita; Nicolette Louissaint; Jianmeng Chen; Hillel W Cohen; Erin C Diament; Anna C Lee; Lydia Soto-Torres; Craig W Hendrix; Betsy C Herold Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-01-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Annalene Nel; Linda-Gail Bekker; Elizabeth Bukusi; Elizabeth Hellstrӧm; Philip Kotze; Cheryl Louw; Francis Martinson; Gileard Masenga; Elizabeth Montgomery; Nelisiwe Ndaba; Ariane van der Straten; Neliëtte van Niekerk; Cynthia Woodsong Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-03-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kate M Guthrie; Joseph L Fava; Sara E Vargas; Rochelle K Rosen; Julia G Shaw; Erna M Kojic; Anthony S Ham; Lisa C Rohan; David Katz; Anacecilia Panameño; Christopher Colleran; David F Friend; Karen W Buckheit; Robert W Buckheit Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2020-11-03 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Rogers Sekabira; Ian McGowan; Krista Yuhas; Rhonda M Brand; Mark A Marzinke; Yukari C Manabe; Ian Frank; Joseph Eron; Raphael J Landovitz; Peter Anton; Ross D Cranston; Peter Anderson; Kenneth H Mayer; K Rivet Amico; Timothy J Wilkin; Wairimu Chege; Adeodata R Kekitiinwa; Marybeth McCauley; Roy M Gulick; Craig W Hendrix Journal: AIDS Date: 2021-08-01 Impact factor: 4.632
Authors: Terry A Jacot; Meredith R Clark; Oluwatosin E Adedipe; Susan Godbout; Abby G Peele; Susan Ju; Jill L Schwartz; Andrea R Thurman; Gustavo F Doncel Journal: Clin Transl Med Date: 2018-11-07
Authors: Kevin M Tyo; Farnaz Minooei; Keegan C Curry; Sarah M NeCamp; Danielle L Graves; Joel R Fried; Jill M Steinbach-Rankins Journal: Pharmaceutics Date: 2019-04-03 Impact factor: 6.321
Authors: Katherine E Bunge; Charlene S Dezzutti; Craig W Hendrix; Mark A Marzinke; Hans M L Spiegel; Bernard J Moncla; Jill L Schwartz; Leslie A Meyn; Nicola Richardson-Harman; Lisa C Rohan; Sharon L Hillier Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 5.396
Authors: Deborah J Anderson; Joseph A Politch; Richard A Cone; Larry Zeitlin; Samuel K Lai; Philip J Santangelo; Thomas R Moench; Kevin J Whaley Journal: Biol Reprod Date: 2020-08-04 Impact factor: 4.161