Literature DB >> 22795639

Changes in use of long-acting contraceptive methods in the United States, 2007-2009.

Lawrence B Finer1, Jenna Jerman, Megan L Kavanaugh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in the use of long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods-the intrauterine device (IUD) and implant--and the extent to which these methods have replaced permanent sterilization and less effective short-acting methods.
DESIGN: We tabulated data from female survey respondents overall and by demographic subgroups. We performed t-tests of the differences in the proportions of female contraceptors using LARC in 2007 and 2009. We also looked at use of LARC, sterilization, other methods, and no method among women at risk of unintended pregnancy.
SETTING: In-home survey. PATIENT(S): All female respondents to the surveys. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Current use of LARC methods in 2009, and change in use from 2007. RESULT(S): The proportion of contraceptors using LARC increased significantly from 2.4% in 2002 to 3.7% in 2007 and 8.5% in 2009. The increase occurred among women in almost every age, race, education, and income group. Among women at risk of unintended pregnancy, increases in LARC use more than offset decreases in sterilization. CONCLUSION(S): LARC methods (primarily IUDs) are contributing to an increase in contraceptive effectiveness in the United States.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22795639      PMCID: PMC3462302          DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  10 in total

1.  The checkered history and bright future of intrauterine contraception in the United States.

Authors:  David Hubacher
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr

2.  Prepregnancy contraceptive use among teens with unintended pregnancies resulting in live births - Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 2004-2008.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 17.586

3.  Determinants of and disparities in reproductive health service use among adolescent and young adult women in the United States, 2002-2008.

Authors:  Kelli Stidham Hall; Caroline Moreau; James Trussell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  ACOG practice bulletin. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 59, January 2005. Intrauterine device.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities, 2006.

Authors:  Lawrence B Finer; Mia R Zolna
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  ACOG Practice Bulletin no. 109: Cervical cytology screening.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Characteristics of women in the United States who use long-acting reversible contraceptive methods.

Authors:  Megan L Kavanaugh; Jenna Jerman; David Hubacher; Kathryn Kost; Lawrence B Finer
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Poststerilization regret: findings from the United States Collaborative Review of Sterilization.

Authors:  S D Hillis; P A Marchbanks; L R Tylor; H B Peterson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Unintended pregnancy among U.S. adolescents: accounting for sexual activity.

Authors:  Lawrence B Finer
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 5.012

10.  Cost effectiveness of contraceptives in the United States.

Authors:  James Trussell; Anjana M Lalla; Quan V Doan; Eileen Reyes; Lionel Pinto; Joseph Gricar
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 3.375

  10 in total
  98 in total

1.  Socioeconomic Variation in the Effect of Economic Conditions on Marriage and Nonmarital Fertility in the United States: Evidence From the Great Recession.

Authors:  Daniel Schneider; Orestes P Hastings
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2015-12

2.  Motivations for Interest, Disinterest and Uncertainty in Intrauterine Device Use Among Young Women.

Authors:  Anu Manchikanti Gomez; Bridget Freihart
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-09

3.  Positive Testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis and the Risk of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease in IUD Users.

Authors:  Natalia E Birgisson; Qiuhong Zhao; Gina M Secura; Tessa Madden; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Progesterone-only contraception is associated with a shorter progression-free survival in premenopausal women with WHO Grade I meningioma.

Authors:  Tessa A Harland; Jacob L Freeman; Monica Davern; D Jay McCracken; Emma C Celano; Kevin Lillehei; Jeffrey J Olson; D Ryan Ormond
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Contraception for Adolescents: Focusing on Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives (LARC) to Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes.

Authors:  Bliss Kaneshiro; Jennifer Salcedo
Journal:  Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep       Date:  2015-01-28

6.  Celebration meets caution: LARC's boons, potential busts, and the benefits of a reproductive justice approach.

Authors:  Jenny A Higgins
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Improving the Implementation of Evidence-Based Clinical Practices in Adolescent Reproductive Health Care Services.

Authors:  Lisa M Romero; Dawn Middleton; Trisha Mueller; Lia Avellino; Rachel Hallum-Montes
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 5.012

8.  A checklist approach to caring for women seeking pregnancy testing: effects on contraceptive knowledge and use.

Authors:  Jessica Lee; Melissa Papic; Erin Baldauf; Glenn Updike; E Bimla Schwarz
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Bringing patients' social context into the examination room: an investigation of the discussion of social influence during contraceptive counseling.

Authors:  Kira Levy; Alexandra M Minnis; Maureen Lahiff; Julie Schmittdiel; Christine Dehlendorf
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2014-12-07

10.  Evaluating the Whoops Proof S.C. Campaign: A Pair-Matched Group Pretest-Posttest Quasi-experimental Study.

Authors:  Beth Sundstrom; Deborah Billings; Ellie Smith; Merissa Ferrara; Bill Albert; Katherine Suellentrop
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2019-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.