Literature DB >> 24201685

Characteristics associated with discontinuation of long-acting reversible contraception within the first 6 months of use.

Danielle S Grunloh1, Teya Casner, Gina M Secura, Jeffrey F Peipert, Tessa Madden.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To measure discontinuation within 6 months among users of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system, copper intrauterine device (IUD), and etonogestrel implant and identify baseline characteristics associated with early discontinuation.
METHODS: This was an analysis of the Contraceptive CHOICE Project, a cohort study of 9,256 participants provided with no-cost contraception and followed with telephone interviews at 3 and 6 months. We used logistic regression to investigate characteristics associated with early discontinuation of the two IUDs and implant and described reasons for discontinuation.
RESULTS: A total of 6,167 participants were eligible for this analysis. Follow-up data were available for 5,928 participants; 5,495 (93%) were using their method at 6 months and 433 (7%) had discontinued. Discontinuation rates were 7.3%, 8.0%, and 6.9% for the levonorgestrel intrauterine system, copper IUD, and implant, respectively. After adjusting for age, race, marital status, low socioeconomic status, and history of sexually transmitted infection, we found that unmarried women were slightly more likely to discontinue compared with married women (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.59 and adjusted OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.11-2.37, respectively). No other baseline characteristics, including younger age (14-19 years), were associated with early discontinuation. The most common reason given for discontinuation was cramping among IUD users and irregular or frequent bleeding among implant users.
CONCLUSION: Rates of discontinuation of long-acting reversible contraception at 6 months is low and not increased in adolescents and young women. Intrauterine devices and the implant should be considered as first-line contraceptive options among all women to reduce unintended pregnancy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: : II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24201685      PMCID: PMC4051392          DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000435452.86108.59

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  21 in total

1.  Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001.

Authors:  Lawrence B Finer; Stanley K Henshaw
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2006-06

2.  Subject and clinician experience with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Jensen; Anita L Nelson; Antonio C Costales
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Contraceptive discontinuation attributed to method dissatisfaction in the United States.

Authors:  Caroline Moreau; Kelly Cleland; James Trussell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Continuation rates and reasons for removal among Implanon users accessing two family planning clinics in Queensland, Australia.

Authors:  Caroline Harvey; Charrlotte Seib; Jayne Lucke
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Unintended pregnancy: worldwide levels, trends, and outcomes.

Authors:  Susheela Singh; Gilda Sedgh; Rubina Hussain
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2010-12

6.  The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  Gina M Secura; Jenifer E Allsworth; Tessa Madden; Jennifer L Mullersman; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  ACOG Committee Opinion no. 450: Increasing use of contraceptive implants and intrauterine devices to reduce unintended pregnancy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Implanon users are less likely to be satisfied with their contraception after 6 months than IUD users.

Authors:  Renee C Wong; Robin J Bell; Kalyani Thunuguntla; Kathleen McNamee; Beverley Vollenhoven
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 9.  The effects of unintended pregnancy on infant, child, and parental health: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Jessica D Gipson; Michael A Koenig; Michelle J Hindin
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2008-03

10.  Structured contraceptive counseling provided by the Contraceptive CHOICE Project.

Authors:  Tessa Madden; Jennifer L Mullersman; Karen J Omvig; Gina M Secura; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  35 in total

1.  Tamoxifen for the prevention of unscheduled bleeding in new users of the levonorgestrel 52-mg intrauterine system: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Megan A Cohen; Katharine B Simmons; Alison B Edelman; Jeffrey T Jensen
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Preventing Unintended Pregnancy: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project in Review.

Authors:  Natalia E Birgisson; Qiuhong Zhao; Gina M Secura; Tessa Madden; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  The Impact of Sexual Satisfaction, Functioning, and Perceived Contraceptive Effects on Sex Life on IUD and Implant Continuation at 1 Year.

Authors:  Jessica N Sanders; Jenny A Higgins; Daniel E Adkins; Greggory J Stoddard; Lori M Gawron; David K Turok
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2018-08-18

4.  Ulipristal Acetate for Unscheduled Bleeding in Etonogestrel Implant Users: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Rachel E Zigler; Tessa Madden; Caitlin Ashby; Leping Wan; Colleen McNicholas
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Beyond the Surface: Care Seeking Among Patients Initiating Contraceptive Implant in an Urban Federally Qualified Health Center Network.

Authors:  Anita Ravi; Linda Prine; Gabrielle deFiebre; Susan E Rubin
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2016-09-19

6.  Association of short-term bleeding and cramping patterns with long-acting reversible contraceptive method satisfaction.

Authors:  Justin T Diedrich; Sanyukta Desai; Qiuhong Zhao; Gina Secura; Tessa Madden; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Intrauterine devices at six months: does patient age matter? Results from an urban family medicine federally qualified health center (FQHC) network.

Authors:  Anita Ravi; Linda Prine; Eve Waltermaurer; Natasha Miller; Susan E Rubin
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.657

8.  Complications and continuation rates associated with 2 types of long-acting contraception.

Authors:  Abbey B Berenson; Alai Tan; Jacqueline M Hirth
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Using behavioral economic theory to increase use of effective contraceptives among opioid-maintained women at risk of unintended pregnancy.

Authors:  Sarah H Heil; Dennis J Hand; Stacey C Sigmon; Gary J Badger; Marjorie C Meyer; Stephen T Higgins
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 4.018

10.  Incidence of Discontinuation of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception among Adolescent and Young Adult Women Served by an Urban Primary Care Clinic.

Authors:  Katharine K Sznajder; Kathy S Tomaszewski; Anne E Burke; Maria Trent
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 1.814

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.