Literature DB >> 22621627

Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception.

Brooke Winner1, Jeffrey F Peipert, Qiuhong Zhao, Christina Buckel, Tessa Madden, Jenifer E Allsworth, Gina M Secura.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The rate of unintended pregnancy in the United States is much higher than in other developed nations. Approximately half of unintended pregnancies are due to contraceptive failure, largely owing to inconsistent or incorrect use.
METHODS: We designed a large prospective cohort study to promote the use of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods as a means of reducing unintended pregnancies in our region. Participants were provided with reversible contraception of their choice at no cost. We compared the rate of failure of long-acting reversible contraception (intrauterine devices [IUDs] and implants) with other commonly prescribed contraceptive methods (oral contraceptive pills, transdermal patch, contraceptive vaginal ring, and depot medroxyprogesterone acetate [DMPA] injection) in the overall cohort and in groups stratified according to age (less than 21 years of age vs. 21 years or older).
RESULTS: Among the 7486 participants included in this analysis, we identified 334 unintended pregnancies. The contraceptive failure rate among participants using pills, patch, or ring was 4.55 per 100 participant-years, as compared with 0.27 among participants using long-acting reversible contraception (hazard ratio after adjustment for age, educational level, and history with respect to unintended pregnancy, 21.8; 95% confidence interval, 13.7 to 34.9). Among participants who used pills, patch, or ring, those who were less than 21 years of age had a risk of unintended pregnancy that was almost twice as high as the risk among older participants. Rates of unintended pregnancy were similarly low among participants using DMPA injection and those using an IUD or implant, regardless of age.
CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception is superior to that of contraceptive pills, patch, or ring and is not altered in adolescents and young women. (Funded by the Susan Thompson Buffet Foundation.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22621627     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1110855

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  233 in total

Review 1.  Combined hormonal contraceptives: prescribing patterns, compliance, and benefits versus risks.

Authors:  Jan Brynhildsen
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2014-10

2.  Effect of HIV status on fertility desire and knowledge of long-acting reversible contraception of postpartum Malawian women.

Authors:  Michele S O'Shea; Nora E Rosenberg; Mina C Hosseinipour; Gretchen S Stuart; William C Miller; Stephen M Kaliti; Mwawi Mwale; Phylos P Bonongwe; Jennifer H Tang
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2014-11-04

3.  Likelihood of emergency contraception use among African-American women at risk of adverse birth outcomes.

Authors:  Catherine E Lind; Emily M Godfrey; Kristin M Rankin; Arden S Handler
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-07

4.  Barriers to Intrauterine Device Uptake in a Rural Setting in Ghana.

Authors:  Nuriya Robinson; Mosa Moshabela; Lydia Owusu-Ansah; Chisina Kapungu; Stacie Geller
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  2014-10-14

5.  Comparison of unintended pregnancy at 12 months between two contraceptive care programs; a controlled time-trend design.

Authors:  Tessa Madden; Rachel Paul; Ragini Maddipati; Christina Buckel; Melody Goodman; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Positive Testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis and the Risk of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease in IUD Users.

Authors:  Natalia E Birgisson; Qiuhong Zhao; Gina M Secura; Tessa Madden; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Immediate Versus Delayed Insertion of the Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device in Postpartum Adolescents: A Randomized Pilot Study.

Authors:  Reni Soon; Katie McGuire; Jennifer Salcedo; Bliss Kaneshiro
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2018-03

8.  Long-acting reversible contraceptive acceptability and unintended pregnancy among women presenting for short-acting methods: a randomized patient preference trial.

Authors:  David Hubacher; Hannah Spector; Charles Monteith; Pai-Lien Chen; Catherine Hart
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Weight change at 12 months in users of three progestin-only contraceptive methods.

Authors:  Zevidah Vickery; Tessa Madden; Qiuhong Zhao; Gina M Secura; Jenifer E Allsworth; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  Evaluating the Whoops Proof S.C. Campaign: A Pair-Matched Group Pretest-Posttest Quasi-experimental Study.

Authors:  Beth Sundstrom; Deborah Billings; Ellie Smith; Merissa Ferrara; Bill Albert; Katherine Suellentrop
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2019-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.