Literature DB >> 25820980

Playing with Data--Or How to Discourage Questionable Research Practices and Stimulate Researchers to Do Things Right.

Klaas Sijtsma1.   

Abstract

Recent fraud cases in psychological and medical research have emphasized the need to pay attention to Questionable Research Practices (QRPs). Deliberate or not, QRPs usually have a deteriorating effect on the quality and the credibility of research results. QRPs must be revealed but prevention of QRPs is more important than detection. I suggest two policy measures that I expect to be effective in improving the quality of psychological research. First, the research data and the research materials should be made publicly available so as to allow verification. Second, researchers should more readily consider consulting a methodologist or a statistician. These two measures are simple but run against common practice to keep data to oneself and overestimate one's methodological and statistical skills, thus allowing secrecy and errors to enter research practice.

Keywords:  data fraud; hiring a methodologist/statistician; public availability of data; questionable research practices

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 25820980     DOI: 10.1007/s11336-015-9446-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.500


  36 in total

1.  False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant.

Authors:  Joseph P Simmons; Leif D Nelson; Uri Simonsohn
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-10-17

2.  Fostering integrity in research: definitions, current knowledge, and future directions.

Authors:  Nicholas H Steneck
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values.

Authors:  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

Review 4.  Research ethics and lessons from Hwanggate: what can we learn from the Korean cloning fraud?

Authors:  R Saunders; J Savulescu
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Global research integrity in relation to the United States' research-integrity infrastructure.

Authors:  Melissa S Anderson
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  The Rules of the Game Called Psychological Science.

Authors:  Marjan Bakker; Annette van Dijk; Jelte M Wicherts
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-11

7.  Editors' Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science: A Crisis of Confidence?

Authors:  Harold Pashler; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-11

8.  Public skepticism of psychology: why many people perceive the study of human behavior as unscientific.

Authors:  Scott O Lilienfeld
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2011-06-13

9.  Willingness to share research data is related to the strength of the evidence and the quality of reporting of statistical results.

Authors:  Jelte M Wicherts; Marjan Bakker; Dylan Molenaar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Why most published research findings are false.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 11.613

View more
  6 in total

1.  Are Associations Between "Sexist" Video Games and Decreased Empathy Toward Women Robust? A Reanalysis of Gabbiadini et al. 2016.

Authors:  Christopher J Ferguson; M Brent Donnellan
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2017-06-21

2.  Improving the Conduct and Reporting of Statistical Analysis in Psychology.

Authors:  Klaas Sijtsma; Coosje L S Veldkamp; Jelte M Wicherts
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Encourage Playing with Data and Discourage Questionable Reporting Practices.

Authors:  Daniel H J Wigboldus; Ron Dotsch
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  The influence of journal submission guidelines on authors' reporting of statistics and use of open research practices.

Authors:  David Giofrè; Geoff Cumming; Luca Fresc; Ingrid Boedker; Patrizio Tressoldi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The Use of Questionable Research Practices to Survive in Academia Examined With Expert Elicitation, Prior-Data Conflicts, Bayes Factors for Replication Effects, and the Bayes Truth Serum.

Authors:  Rens van de Schoot; Sonja D Winter; Elian Griffioen; Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen; Ingrid Arts; Duco Veen; Elizabeth M Grandfield; Lars G Tummers
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-11-29

6.  Questionable research practices in student final theses - Prevalence, attitudes, and the role of the supervisor's perceived attitudes.

Authors:  Anand Krishna; Sebastian M Peter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.