Literature DB >> 16501647

Fostering integrity in research: definitions, current knowledge, and future directions.

Nicholas H Steneck1.   

Abstract

Over the last 25 years, a small but growing body of research on research behavior has slowly provided a more complete and critical understanding of research practices, particularly in the biomedical and behavioral sciences. The results of this research suggest that some earlier assumptions about irresponsible conduct are not reliable, leading to the conclusion that there is a need to change the way we think about and regulate research behavior. This paper begins with suggestions for more precise definitions of the terms "responsible conduct of research," "research ethics," and "research integrity." It then summarizes the findings presented in some of the more important studies of research behavior, looking first at levels of occurrence and then impact. Based on this summary, the paper concludes with general observations about priorities and recommendations for steps to improve the effectiveness of efforts to respond to misconduct and foster higher standards for integrity in research.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16501647     DOI: 10.1007/pl00022268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  46 in total

1.  Market forces and unsponsored research in academic health centers.

Authors:  J S Weissman; D Saglam; E G Campbell; N Causino; D Blumenthal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999 Mar 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Fraud will out--or will it?

Authors:  June Price Tangney
Journal:  New Sci       Date:  1987-08-06       Impact factor: 0.319

3.  Effects of training in the responsible conduct of research: a survey of graduate students in experimental sciences.

Authors:  Sarah Brown; Michael W Kalichman
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 4.  Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Justin E Bekelman; Yan Li; Cary P Gross
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003 Jan 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Industry sponsorship and authorship of clinical trials over 20 years.

Authors:  Susan S Buchkowsky; Peter J Jewesson
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2004-02-24       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  Scientific misconduct. Researcher faces prison for fraud in NIH grant applications and papers.

Authors:  Eli Kintisch
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-03-25       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Relationship between market competition and the activities and attitudes of medical school faculty.

Authors:  E G Campbell; J S Weissman; D Blumenthal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-07-16       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Cheating by medical students on examinations.

Authors:  B Stimmel; D Yens
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Looking a gift horse in the mouth: corporate gifts supporting life sciences research.

Authors:  E G Campbell; K S Louis; D Blumenthal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-04-01       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Self-reported assessment by medical students and interns of unprofessional practice.

Authors:  Diaa E E Rizk; Margaret A Elzubeir
Journal:  Teach Learn Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.414

View more
  87 in total

1.  Ethical decision making in the conduct of research: role of individual, contextual and organizational factors. Commentary on "Science, human nature, and a new paradigm for ethics education".

Authors:  Philip J Langlais
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Faculty members' perceptions of advising versus mentoring: does the name matter?

Authors:  Sandra L Titus; Janice M Ballou
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Intrinsic ethics regarding integrated assessment models for climate management.

Authors:  Erich W Schienke; Seth D Baum; Nancy Tuana; Kenneth J Davis; Klaus Keller
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 4.  Research misconduct and data fraud in clinical trials: prevalence and causal factors.

Authors:  Stephen L George
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Conference summary: 'The responsible conduct of basic and clinical research'.

Authors:  Raymond E Spier
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  How frequently do allegations of scientific misconduct occur in ecology and evolution, and what happens afterwards?

Authors:  Gregorio Moreno-Rueda
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Development and validation of the Survey of Organizational Research Climate (SORC).

Authors:  Brian C Martinson; Carol R Thrush; A Lauren Crain
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  Relationships between the Survey of Organizational Research Climate (SORC) and self-reported research practices.

Authors:  A Lauren Crain; Brian C Martinson; Carol R Thrush
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  Individual and organizational predictors of the ethicality of graduate students' responses to research integrity issues.

Authors:  Philip J Langlais; Blake J Bent
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 10.  How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data.

Authors:  Daniele Fanelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.