Literature DB >> 21668088

Public skepticism of psychology: why many people perceive the study of human behavior as unscientific.

Scott O Lilienfeld1.   

Abstract

Data indicate that large percentages of the general public regard psychology's scientific status with considerable skepticism. I examine 6 criticisms commonly directed at the scientific basis of psychology (e.g., psychology is merely common sense, psychology does not use scientific methods, psychology is not useful to society) and offer 6 rebuttals. I then address 8 potential sources of public skepticism toward psychology and argue that although some of these sources reflect cognitive errors (e.g., hindsight bias) or misunderstandings of psychological science (e.g., failure to distinguish basic from applied research), others (e.g., psychology's failure to police itself, psychology's problematic public face) reflect the failure of professional psychology to get its own house in order. I offer several individual and institutional recommendations for enhancing psychology's image and contend that public skepticism toward psychology may, paradoxically, be one of our field's strongest allies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21668088     DOI: 10.1037/a0023963

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Psychol        ISSN: 0003-066X


  13 in total

1.  Playing with Data--Or How to Discourage Questionable Research Practices and Stimulate Researchers to Do Things Right.

Authors:  Klaas Sijtsma
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 2.  Agency, Chance, and the Scientific Status of Psychology.

Authors:  Martin E Morf
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2018-12

3.  Contextual sensitivity in scientific reproducibility.

Authors:  Jay J Van Bavel; Peter Mende-Siedlecki; William J Brady; Diego A Reinero
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Reproducibility and Registration in Sexuality Research.

Authors:  Tierney K Lorenz
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-02

5.  Understanding Suicide Risk within the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Framework: Insights, Challenges, and Future Research Considerations.

Authors:  Catherine R Glenn; Christine B Cha; Evan M Kleiman; Matthew K Nock
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-04-26

6.  Why I teach the controversy: using creationism to teach critical thinking.

Authors:  P Lynne Honey
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-17

7.  The selective allure of neuroscientific explanations.

Authors:  Nicholas Scurich; Adam Shniderman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Psychology as a Science of Subject and Comportment, beyond the Mind and Behavior.

Authors:  Marino Pérez-Álvarez
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2018-03

9.  People's explanatory preferences for scientific phenomena.

Authors:  Deena Skolnick Weisberg; Emily J Hopkins; Jordan C V Taylor
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-11-21

10.  The Prevalence of Pseudoscientific Ideas and Neuromyths Among Sports Coaches.

Authors:  Richard P Bailey; Daniel J Madigan; Ed Cope; Adam R Nicholls
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.