Literature DB >> 18316467

Research ethics and lessons from Hwanggate: what can we learn from the Korean cloning fraud?

R Saunders1, J Savulescu.   

Abstract

In this review of the Korean cloning scandal involving Woo-Suk Hwang, the nature of the disaster is documented and reasons why it occurred are suggested. The general problems it raises for scientific research are highlighted and six possible ways of improving practice are offered in the light of this case: (1) better education of science students; (2) independent monitoring and validation; (3) guidelines for tissue donation for research; (4) fostering of debate about ethically contentious research in science journals; (5) development of an international code of ethical research practice; (6) fostering of public involvement in ethical review and debate through the web.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18316467     DOI: 10.1136/jme.2007.023721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  12 in total

1.  Fraud in scientific research - birth of the Concordat to uphold research integrity in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Ankur Khajuria; Riaz Agha
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Scientists' perspectives on the ethical issues of stem cell research.

Authors:  Holly Longstaff; Catherine A Schuppli; Nina Preto; Darquise Lafrenière; Michael McDonald
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 5.739

3.  Does the Japanese Society for Hygiene need its own Code of Conduct? A comparison of the responses of councilors and junior members based on a questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Wakaha Ikeda; Yutaka Inaba; Tatsuya Takeshita; Katsumi Yoshida; Kumiko Ogoshi; Kazushi Okamoto
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 3.674

4.  Playing with Data--Or How to Discourage Questionable Research Practices and Stimulate Researchers to Do Things Right.

Authors:  Klaas Sijtsma
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  A Reflective Account of a Research Ethics Course for an Interdisciplinary Cohort of Graduate Students.

Authors:  Bor Luen Tang; Joan Siew Ching Lee
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  International standards for research integrity: An idea whose time has come?

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  Perceptions of Chinese Biomedical Researchers Towards Academic Misconduct: A Comparison Between 2015 and 2010.

Authors:  Qing-Jiao Liao; Yuan-Yuan Zhang; Yu-Chen Fan; Ming-Hua Zheng; Yu Bai; Guy D Eslick; Xing-Xiang He; Shi-Bing Zhang; Harry Hua-Xiang Xia; Hua He
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  Research integrity in China: problems and prospects.

Authors:  Weiqin Zeng; David Resnik
Journal:  Dev World Bioeth       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.294

Review 9.  How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data.

Authors:  Daniele Fanelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  The 1-h fraud detection challenge.

Authors:  Marcel A G van der Heyden
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 3.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.