Literature DB >> 25820291

Predictive parameters for medical expulsive therapy in ureteral stones: a critical evaluation.

Cahit Sahin1, Bilal Eryildirim, Alper Kafkasli, Alper Coskun, Fatih Tarhan, Gokhan Faydaci, Kemal Sarica.   

Abstract

To evaluate the predictive value of some certain radiological as well as stone-related parameters for medical expulsive therapy (MET) success with an alpha blocker in ureteral stones. A total 129 patients receiving MET for 5 to 10 mm ureteral stones were evaluated. Patients were divided into two subgroups where MET was successful in 64 cases (49.61%) and unsuccessful in 65 cases (50.39%). Prior to management, stone size, location, position in the ureter, degree of hydronephrosis, diameter of ureteral lumen proximal to the stone, ureteral wall thickness along with patient's demographics including body mass index (BMI) values were evaluated and recorded. The possible predictive values of these parameters for stone expulsion (and stone expulsion time) were evaluated in a comparative manner between two groups. The overall mean patient age and stone size values were 38.02 ± 0.94 years and 40.31 ± 1.13 mm(2), respectively. Regarding the predictive values of these parameters for MET-success, while stone size and localization, degree of hydronephrosis, proximal ureteral diameter and ureteral wall thickness were found to be highly predictive for MET-success, patients age, BMI values and stone density had no predictive value on this aspect. Our findings indicated that some stone and anatomical factors may be used to predict the success of MET in an effective manner. With this approach unnecessary use of these drugs that may cause a delay for stone removal will be avoided and the possible adverse effects of obstruction as well as stone-related clinical symptoms could be minimized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25820291     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-015-0762-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  17 in total

1.  Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT.

Authors:  Deirdre M Coll; Michael J Varanelli; Robert C Smith
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Management of ureteral calculi: a cost comparison and decision making analysis.

Authors:  Yair Lotan; Matthew T Gettman; Claus G Roehrborn; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Margaret S Pearle
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Medical therapy to facilitate the passage of stones: what is the evidence?

Authors:  Christian Seitz; Evangelos Liatsikos; Francesco Porpiglia; Hans-Göran Tiselius; Ulrike Zwergel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Time to stone passage for observed ureteral calculi: a guide for patient education.

Authors:  O F Miller; C J Kane
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Epidemiology and medical management of stone disease.

Authors:  H-G Tiselius
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States.

Authors:  Charles D Scales; Alexandria C Smith; Janet M Hanley; Christopher S Saigal
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Understanding the barriers to the dissemination of medical expulsive therapy.

Authors:  John M Hollingsworth; J Stuart Wolf; Gary J Faerber; William W Roberts; Rodney L Dunn; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Alfuzosin stone expulsion therapy for distal ureteral calculi: a double-blind, placebo controlled study.

Authors:  Renato Nardi Pedro; Bryan Hinck; Kari Hendlin; Kendall Feia; Benjamin K Canales; Manoj Monga
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Is there a role for tamsulosin in the treatment of distal ureteral stones of 7 mm or less? Results of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Thomas Hermanns; Peter Sauermann; Kaspar Rufibach; Thomas Frauenfelder; Tullio Sulser; Räto T Strebel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 10.  Alpha-blockers as medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stones.

Authors:  Thijs Campschroer; Yefang Zhu; Diederick Duijvesz; Diederick E Grobbee; M T W Tycho Lock
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-04-02
View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stones: where do we go from here?

Authors:  Bhaskar K Somani; Omar Aboumarzouk; Olivier Traxer; Joyce Baard; Guido Kamphuis; Jean de la Rosette
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  CT-related parameters and Framingham score as predictors of spontaneous passage of ureteral stones ≤ 10 mm: results from a prospective, observational, multicenter study.

Authors:  Ismail Selvi; Numan Baydilli; Turgut Tursem Tokmak; Emre Can Akinsal; Halil Basar
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2020-09-27       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Can negative ureteroscopy be predicted in ureteral stone treatment?

Authors:  Mehmet Oguz Sahin; Volkan Sen; Bora Irer; Guner Yildiz
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Impaction of ureteral stones into the ureteral wall: Is it possible to predict?

Authors:  Kemal Sarica; Bilal Eryildirim; Cahit Sahin; Kubilay Sabuncu; Cihangir Cetinel; Fehmi Narter
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Outcome of α-blockers, with or without methylprednisolone combination, in medical expulsive therapy for lower ureteric stones: A prospective randomised study.

Authors:  Waleed Shabana; Mohamed Teleb; Tamer Dawod; Hisham Abu Taha; Alla Abdulla; Ashraf Shahin; Mahmoud Eladl; Safwat Abo-Hashem
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2016-02-06

6.  A Comparison of Urolithiasis in the Presence and Absence of Microscopic Hematuria in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Jason M Mefford; Robert M Tungate; Leila Amini; Dongjin Suh; Craig L Anderson; Scott E Rudkin; Megan Boysen-Osborn
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2017-05-15

7.  Predictive value of ureteral wall thickness (UWT) assessment on the success of internal ureteral stent insertion in cases with obstructing ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Kemal Sarica; Bilal Eryildirim; Hakan Akdere; M Alı Karagoz; Yavuz Karaca; Ahmet Sahan
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Comparative efficacy of tamsulosin versus nifedipine for distal ureteral calculi: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hai Wang; Li Bo Man; Guang Lin Huang; Gui Zhong Li; Jian Wei Wang
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 4.162

9.  Radiological noninvasive assessment of ureteral stone impaction into the ureteric wall: A critical evaluation with objective radiological parameters.

Authors:  Ozlem Elibol; Kadihan Yalcin Safak; Ayse Buz; Bilal Eryildirim; Kutluhan Erdem; Kemal Sarica
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2017-07-31

10.  Medical expulsive therapy for ureter stone using naftopidil: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Sung Yong Cho; Woong Na; Sang Wook Lee; Min Chul Cho; Jong Jin Oh; Sangchul Lee; Juhyun Park; Soyeon Ahn; Chang Wook Jeong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.