Literature DB >> 32980972

CT-related parameters and Framingham score as predictors of spontaneous passage of ureteral stones ≤ 10 mm: results from a prospective, observational, multicenter study.

Ismail Selvi1,2, Numan Baydilli3, Turgut Tursem Tokmak4, Emre Can Akinsal3, Halil Basar5.   

Abstract

To investigate the reliability of newly defined CT-related parameters and cardiovascular risk factors in groups adjusted for stone size and location to predict spontaneous stone passage (SP) of uncomplicated ureteral stones ≤ 10 mm. The data of 280 adult patients with solitary unilateral ureteral stones ≤ 10 mm in diameter in non-contrast computed tomography were prospectively recorded. All patients undergoing a four-week observation protocol with medical expulsive therapy using tamsulosin were divided into two groups according to SP or no SP. Demographic, clinical and radiological findings of these groups were recorded. Spontaneous stone passage was observed in 176 (62.9%) of the patients, whereas the SP rate was 57.6% for 118 upper ureteral stones and 66.7% for 162 lower ureteral stones. The SP rate was 13.3 times greater with ureteral wall thickness < 1.88 mm, 4.4 times greater with a ratio of ureter to stone diameter of < 1.24, 3.4 times greater with Framingham score of < 11.5%, 2 times greater with neutrophil lymphocyte ratio < 1.96, 1.9 times greater with ureteral diameter < 6.33 mm and 1.5 times greater with stone volume < 38.54 mm3. Lower levels of ureteral wall thickness, ratio of ureter to stone diameter, Framingham score, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio, ureteral diameter, stone volume and absence of hydronephrosis were found to be more successful predictors. We consider that the success rate can be increased by selection of the proper option (observation or active treatment) according to these predictors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Framingham risk score; Neutrophil lymphocyte ratio; Spontaneous stone passage; Ureteral diameter; Ureteral stone; Ureteral wall thickness

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32980972     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-020-01214-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  21 in total

1.  Predictors for spontaneous stone passage in patients with renal colic secondary to ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Stavros Sfoungaristos; Adamantios Kavouras; Petros Perimenis
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Association of metabolic syndrome traits and severity of kidney stones: results from a nationwide survey on urolithiasis in Japan.

Authors:  Yasuo Kohjimoto; Yumiko Sasaki; Masanori Iguchi; Nagahide Matsumura; Takeshi Inagaki; Isao Hara
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 8.860

3.  Hounsfield Units for nephrolithiasis: predictive power for the clinical urologist.

Authors:  Andrew Cohen; Blake Anderson; Glenn Gerber
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.344

4.  Ureteral wall thickness as a significant factor in predicting spontaneous passage of ureteral stones of ≤ 10 mm: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Takashi Yoshida; Takaaki Inoue; Makoto Taguchi; Naoto Omura; Hidefumi Kinoshita; Tadashi Matsuda
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Predictive parameters for medical expulsive therapy in ureteral stones: a critical evaluation.

Authors:  Cahit Sahin; Bilal Eryildirim; Alper Kafkasli; Alper Coskun; Fatih Tarhan; Gokhan Faydaci; Kemal Sarica
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Longitudinal stone diameter on coronal reconstruction of computed tomography as a predictor of ureteral stone expulsion in medical expulsive therapy.

Authors:  Seung Ryeol Lee; Hwang Gyun Jeon; Dong Soo Park; Young Deuk Choi
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Abnormalities of 24-hour urine composition in first-time and recurrent stone-formers.

Authors:  Brian H Eisner; Sonali Sheth; Stephen P Dretler; Benjamin Herrick; Vernon M Pais
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Analysis of factors affecting spontaneous expulsion of ureteral stones that may predict unfavorable outcomes during watchful waiting periods: What is the influence of diabetes mellitus on the ureter?

Authors:  Taesoo Choi; Koo Han Yoo; Seung-Kwon Choi; Dong Soo Kim; Dong-Gi Lee; Gyeong Eun Min; Seung Hyun Jeon; Hyung-Lae Lee; In-Kyung Jeong
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-05-27

9.  Ultrasound vs. Computed Tomography for Severity of Hydronephrosis and Its Importance in Renal Colic.

Authors:  Megan M Leo; Breanne K Langlois; Joseph R Pare; Patricia Mitchell; Judith Linden; Kerrie P Nelson; Cristopher Amanti; Kristin A Carmody
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2017-05-15

10.  Size matters: The width and location of a ureteral stone accurately predict the chance of spontaneous passage.

Authors:  Johan Jendeberg; Håkan Geijer; Muhammed Alshamari; Bartosz Cierzniak; Mats Lidén
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  3 in total

1.  Does volume matter? Incorporating estimated stone volume in a nomogram to predict ureteral stone passage.

Authors:  Nassib Abou Heidar; Muhieddine Labban; David-Dan Nguyen; Adnan El-Achkar; Mazen Mansour; Naeem Bhojani; Rami Nasr
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Role of inflammatory markers and their trends in predicting the outcome of medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteric calculus.

Authors:  Vasantharaja Ramasamy; P Aarthy; Vivek Sharma; Avinash Pratap Singh Thakur
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2021-12-28

3.  Clinical and Radiological Predictors of Early Intervention in Acute Ureteral Colic.

Authors:  Faris Abushamma; Mahfouz Ktaifan; Abdoh Abdallah; Mohammad Alkarajeh; Mosab Maree; Ahmed Awadghanem; Ahmad Jaradat; Amir Aghbar; Sa'ed H Zyoud; Francis X Keeley
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-07-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.