Literature DB >> 33388820

Predictive value of ureteral wall thickness (UWT) assessment on the success of internal ureteral stent insertion in cases with obstructing ureteral calculi.

Kemal Sarica1, Bilal Eryildirim2, Hakan Akdere3, M Alı Karagoz4, Yavuz Karaca5, Ahmet Sahan5.   

Abstract

To evaluate the possible role of ureteral wall thickness (UWT) assessment in the prediction of the success for stent placement in cases with obstructing ureteric stones. 227 adult patients with a single unilateral obstructing ureteral stone requiring internal ureteral stent placement were included. In addition to stone size, the ureteric wall thickness at the impacted stone site and the degree of hydronephrosis were also assigned on CT images. Patients were divided into two subgroups: Group 1: patients in whom internal ureteral stent could not be passed beyond the stone and Group 2: patients in whom an internal ureteral stent was passed successfully. The possible relationship between the UWT values and the success of stent placement, degree of hydronephrosis were comparatively evaluated. The majority of the stones were located in the proximal ureter in Group 1 and the degree of hydronephrosis was also higher in these cases. Moreover, while the mean value of UWT calculated on CT images was 4.3 ± 0.9 mm in Group 1, this value was noted to be 2.5 ± 0.8 mm in cases of group 2. A cutoff UWT value of 3.35 mm was highly predictive for the stent insertion and cases with higher values required additional procedures or percutaneous nephrostomy tube placement. UWT value calculated at the obstructing stone site was found to be predictive enough for the likelihood of internal ureteral stent passage with high sensitivity and specificity. This evaluation may enable the urologist to make the best decision for urinary diversion in such cases.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hydronephrosis; Ureteral stent; Ureteral wall thickness; Ureteric stone

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33388820     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-020-01233-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  22 in total

Review 1.  Management of ureteric stones: issues and controversies.

Authors:  Matthew T Gettman; Joseph W Segura
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 2.  2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Glenn M Preminger; Hans-Göran Tiselius; Dean G Assimos; Peter Alken; Colin Buck; Michele Gallucci; Thomas Knoll; James E Lingeman; Stephen Y Nakada; Margaret Sue Pearle; Kemal Sarica; Christian Türk; J Stuart Wolf
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  An unusual complication of ureteral double-J stent placement: ureteral perforation.

Authors:  M Resorlu; T Karakan; M Kabar; A Demirbas; D Orsan Demir; M Eroglu
Journal:  JBR-BTR       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

4.  Formula for predicting the impaction of ureteral stones.

Authors:  Sait Özbir; Osman Can; Hasan Anıl Atalay; Halil Lütfi Canat; Süleyman Sami Çakır; Alper Ötünçtemur
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Double J ureteral stent displaced through the right ventricle.

Authors:  Ismail Oral Hastaoglu; Hamdi Tokoz; Ela Kavlak; Fuat Bilgen
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-03-14

Review 6.  Diagnosis and metaphylaxis of stone disease. Consensus concept of the National Working Committee on Stone Disease for the upcoming German Urolithiasis Guideline.

Authors:  M Straub; W L Strohmaier; W Berg; B Beck; B Hoppe; N Laube; S Lahme; M Schmidt; A Hesse; K U Koehrmann
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2005-11-29       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Temporal trends, practice patterns, and treatment outcomes for infected upper urinary tract stones in the United States.

Authors:  Jesse D Sammon; Khurshid R Ghani; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Naeem Bhojani; Praful Ravi; Maxine Sun; Shyam Sukumar; Vincent Q Trinh; Keith J Kowalczyk; Simon P Kim; James O Peabody; Mani Menon; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Experience with new double J ureteral catheter stent.

Authors:  R P Finney
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Misplacement or migration? Extremely rare case of cardiac migration of a ureteral j stent.

Authors:  Tae Nam Kim; Chan Ho Lee; Do Hoon Kong; Dong Kil Shin; Jeong Zoo Lee
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2014-05-12

10.  Migration of double J stent into the inferior vena cava and the right atrium.

Authors:  Ravindra B Sabnis; Arvind P Ganpule; Sanika A Ganpule
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2013-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.