Literature DB >> 19375849

Is there a role for tamsulosin in the treatment of distal ureteral stones of 7 mm or less? Results of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Thomas Hermanns1, Peter Sauermann, Kaspar Rufibach, Thomas Frauenfelder, Tullio Sulser, Räto T Strebel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Numerous randomised trials have confirmed the efficacy of medical expulsive therapy with tamsulosin in patients with distal ureteral stones; however, to date, no randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials have been performed.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this trial was to evaluate the efficacy of medical expulsive therapy with tamsulosin in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled setting. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients presenting with single distal ureteral stones < or = 7 mm were included in this trial. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomised in a double-blind fashion to receive either tamsulosin or placebo for 21 d. The medication was discontinued after either stone expulsion or intervention. Abdominal computed tomography was performed to assess the initial and final stone status. MEASUREMENTS AND LIMITATIONS: The primary end point was the stone expulsion rate. Secondary end points were time to stone passage, the amount of analgesic required, the maximum daily pain score, safety of the therapy, and the intervention rate.
RESULTS: Ten of 100 randomised patients were excluded from the analysis. No statistically significant differences in patient characteristics and stone size (median: 4.1 mm [tamsulosin arm] vs 3.8 mm [placebo arm], p=0.3) were found between the two treatment arms. The stone expulsion rate was not significantly different between the tamsulosin arm (86.7%) and the placebo arm (88.9%; p=1.0). Median time to stone passage was 7 d in the tamsulosin arm and 10 d in the placebo arm (log-rank test, p=0.36). Patients in the tamsulosin arm required significantly fewer analgesics than patients in the placebo arm (median: 3 vs 7, p=0.011). A caveat is that the exact time of stone passage was missing for 29 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Tamsulosin treatment does not improve the stone expulsion rate in patients with distal ureteral stones < or = 7 mm. Nevertheless, patients may benefit from a supportive analgesic effect. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT00831701.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19375849     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  27 in total

Review 1.  Kidney stones.

Authors:  Timothy Y Tseng; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2011-11-10

2.  Tamsulosin does not have greater efficacy than conventional treatment for distal ureteral stone expulsion in Mexican patients.

Authors:  Raúl Ochoa-Gómez; Emilio Prieto-Díaz-Chávez; Benjamín Trujillo-Hernández; Clemente Vásquez
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2011-04-24

3.  Medical management of renal stones: More than analgesia?

Authors:  G Michael Allan; Noah Ivers; Michael Kolber
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 4.  Kidney stones: an update on current pharmacological management and future directions.

Authors:  Hongshi Xu; Anna L Zisman; Fredric L Coe; Elaine M Worcester
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.889

5.  Predictive parameters for medical expulsive therapy in ureteral stones: a critical evaluation.

Authors:  Cahit Sahin; Bilal Eryildirim; Alper Kafkasli; Alper Coskun; Fatih Tarhan; Gokhan Faydaci; Kemal Sarica
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of isosorbide-SR addition to current treatment in medical expulsive therapy for ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Ali Hamidi Madani; Majid Kazemzadeh; Farshid Pourreza; Maryam Shakiba; Alireza Farzan; Ahmad Asadollahzade; Samaneh Esmaeili
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2011-01-05

7.  Managing Small Ureteral Stones: A Retrospective Study on Follow-Up, Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Conservative Management vs. Early Surgery.

Authors:  Aristeidis Alevizopoulos; Dimitrios Zosimas; Lamprini Piha; Milad Hanna; Konstantinos Charitopoulos
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2016-02-10

8.  Effect of medical expulsive therapy on the health-related quality of life of patients with ureteral stones: a critical evaluation.

Authors:  Bilal Eryildirim; Cahit Sahin; Murat Tuncer; Kubilay Sabuncu; Cihangir Cetinel; Fatih Tarhan; Kemal Sarica
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Naftopidil versus flopropione as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones: results of a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, controlled trial.

Authors:  Yasuo Kohjimoto; Keizo Hagino; Takatoshi Ogawa; Takeshi Inagaki; Shinji Kitamura; Masaya Nishihata; Akinori Iba; Nagahide Matsumura; Isao Hara
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Tamsulosin and tolterodine in the medical expulsive therapy for intramural ureteral stones with vesical irritability: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Jian Lin Lv; Qing lai Tang
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 3.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.