Literature DB >> 25869741

Pantomime-grasping: the 'return' of haptic feedback supports the absolute specification of object size.

Shirin Davarpanah Jazi1, Michelle Yau, David A Westwood, Matthew Heath.   

Abstract

When an individual grasps a physical object, the visuomotor system is able to specify grip aperture via absolute visual information. In contrast, grasping to a location previously occupied by an object (i.e., pantomime-grasping) results in the specification of grip aperture via relative visual information. The basis for the dissociable visual codes is thought to reflect that pantomime-grasping is a perception-based task. It is, however, important to recognize that grasping a physical object and pantomime-grasping differ not only in terms of their visuospatial properties but also with respect to the availability of haptic feedback: Grasping a physical object provides haptic cues derived from touching the object, whereas no such feedback is available in a traditional pantomime-grasping task. As such, we examined whether haptic feedback influences the information supporting a pantomime-grasp performed after a 1000-ms visual delay. Participants completed responses in each of the three tasks: (1) grasping a physical object, (2) traditional pantomime-grasping wherein the to-be-grasped object was removed from the grasping environment and (3) pantomime-grasping wherein the experimenter placed the object between participants' thumb and forefinger once they had completed their response (i.e., pantomime-grasping with haptic feedback). Just-noticeable-difference (JND) scores were computed to determine whether responses adhered to or violated the psychophysical (i.e., relative) principles of Weber's law. JNDs for the traditional pantomime-grasping task adhered to Weber's law, whereas JNDs for grasping a physical object and for pantomime-grasping with haptic feedback violated the law. Thus, we propose that convergent visual and haptic cues support the absolute specification of object size in a pantomime-grasping task. Furthermore, our results highlight the important role of multisensory cue integration in a target-defined grasping task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25869741     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4274-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  43 in total

1.  Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching.

Authors:  A M Wing; A Turton; C Fraser
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Grasping Weber's law.

Authors:  Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

4.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

5.  Oculomotor task switching: alternating from a nonstandard to a standard response yields the unidirectional prosaccade switch-cost.

Authors:  Jeffrey Weiler; Matthew Heath
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Delayed action does not always require the ventral stream: a study on a patient with visual form agnosia.

Authors:  Constanze Hesse; Thomas Schenk
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  The unidirectional prosaccade switch-cost: correct and error antisaccades differentially influence the planning times for subsequent prosaccades.

Authors:  Jesse C DeSimone; Jeffrey Weiler; Gabriella S Aber; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Constraints on human arm movement trajectories.

Authors:  R G Marteniuk; C L MacKenzie; M Jeannerod; S Athenes; C Dugas
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1987-09

9.  The influence of premovement visual information on manual aiming.

Authors:  D Elliott; J Madalena
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1987-08

10.  How vision affects kinematic properties of pantomimed prehension movements.

Authors:  Takao Fukui; Toshio Inui
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-07
View more
  6 in total

1.  Grasping a 2D object: terminal haptic feedback supports an absolute visuo-haptic calibration.

Authors:  Stephanie Hosang; Jillian Chan; Shirin Davarpanah Jazi; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Manual estimations of functionally graspable target objects adhere to Weber's law.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Joseph Manzone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Haptic feedback attenuates illusory bias in pantomime-grasping: evidence for a visuo-haptic calibration.

Authors:  Jillian Chan; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Synchrony of the Reach and the Grasp in pantomime reach-to-grasp.

Authors:  Jessica R Kuntz; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Horizontal target size perturbations during grasping movements are described by subsequent size perception and saccade amplitude.

Authors:  Pablo Sanz Diez; Annalisa Bosco; Patrizia Fattori; Siegfried Wahl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Pantomime-Grasping: Advance Knowledge of Haptic Feedback Availability Supports an Absolute Visuo-Haptic Calibration.

Authors:  Shirin Davarpanah Jazi; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.