Literature DB >> 31845235

Risk Factors and Management of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Single-center Experience.

Zun-Xiang Ke1, Jiong-Xin Xiong2, Jin Hu2, Heng-Yu Chen3, Qin Li4, Yi-Qing Li5.   

Abstract

Pancreatic fistula (PF) remains the most frequent complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). This study was undertaken to explore the risk factors of postoperative PF following PD and discuss the management of PF in our center. A single-center respective study, involving 241 patients who underwent PD between September 2015 and June 2018, was conducted. Differences in the demographic data, preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative variables between the group with PF [International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) grade B/C] and the group without PF (no PF and ISGPS grade BL) were evaluated. The diagnosis and grading of PF were in strict accordance with ISGPS. Risk factors were analyzed by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis. The results showed that postoperative PF occurred in 50 (20.7%) of the patients; 25 (10.4%) patients had a PF type BL, 46 (19.1%) patients developed a PF type B and 4 (1.6%) had a PF type C. Univariate analysis showed that fasting blood glucose (P=0.02), pancreatic texture (P< 0.001) and pancreatic duct diameter (P=0.01) were correlated with PF. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified one independent risk factor for postoperative PF: soft pancreatic texture (OR=3.251, P=0.002). Among the cases, there were three postoperative deaths, giving a 60-day hospital mortality rate of 1.2% (3/241), and the mortality related to PF was 4.0% (2/50). One of the patients died from multiple organ failure caused by postoperative abdominal hemorrhage. In conclusion, soft pancreatic texture is an independent risk factor for PF. Surgeons should be well aware of this risk factor when performing a PD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complication; pancreatic fistulae; pancreatic texture; pancreaticoduodenectomy; risk factors

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31845235     DOI: 10.1007/s11596-019-2136-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Sci        ISSN: 2523-899X


  61 in total

1.  The evaluation of duct-to-mucosal pancreaticojejunostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Masaji Tani; Hironobu Onishi; Hiroyuki Kinoshita; Manabu Kawai; Masaki Ueno; Takashi Hama; Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Michael L Kendrick; Jony van Hilst; Ugo Boggi; Thijs de Rooij; R Matthew Walsh; Herbert J Zeh; Steven J Hughes; Yoshiharu Nakamura; Charles M Vollmer; David A Kooby; Horacio J Asbun
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Pasireotide for postoperative pancreatic fistula.

Authors:  Feng Yang; Chen Jin; Deliang Fu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Modified Blumgart anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy: technical improvement in matched historical control study.

Authors:  Tsutomu Fujii; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Suguru Yamada; Mitsuro Kanda; Masaya Suenaga; Hideki Takami; Masashi Hattori; Yoshikuni Inokawa; Shuji Nomoto; Michitaka Fujiwara; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  A new pancreaticojejunostomy technique: a battle against postoperative pancreatic fistula.

Authors:  Stylianos Katsaragakis; Andreas Larentzakis; Sotirios-Georgios Panousopoulos; Konstantinos G Toutouzas; Dimitrios Theodorou; Spyridon Stergiopoulos; Georgios Androulakis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Incidence and management of pancreatic leakage after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  S M M de Castro; O R C Busch; T M van Gulik; H Obertop; D J Gouma
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 7.  Evolution and current status of the Whipple procedure: an update for gastroenterologists.

Authors:  S M Strasberg; J A Drebin; N J Soper
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula.

Authors:  John W Lin; John L Cameron; Charles J Yeo; Taylor S Riall; Keith D Lillemoe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal complications after pancreatoduodenectomy: multivariate analysis in 300 patients.

Authors:  Fabrice Muscari; Bertrand Suc; Sylvain Kirzin; Jean-Marie Hay; Gilles Fourtanier; Abe Fingerhut; Bernard Sastre; Jacques Chipponi; Pierre-Louis Fagniez; Alexandre Radovanovic
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy in reconstruction following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  S Takano; Y Ito; Y Watanabe; T Yokoyama; N Kubota; S Iwai
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  1 in total

1.  Application analysis of omental flap isolation and modified pancreaticojejunostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy (175 cases).

Authors:  Shun Deng; Jianhong Luo; Yongzhong Ouyang; Jiangbo Xie; Zhuo He; Bo Huang; Fei Bai; Ke Xiao; Bin Yin; Jinfeng Wang; Biaoming Xu; Chaohui Zuo
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 2.102

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.