Literature DB >> 29581684

Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Single-Surgeon Initial Experience.

Mingjun Wang1, Yunqiang Cai1, Yongbin Li1, Bing Peng1.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery has gained increasing acceptance over the last few years, which has expanded to pancreaticoduodenectomy. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy has been determined to be a feasible, safe, and effective procedure in an experienced surgeon's hands, but the adaptations to the clumsy instruments are needed. The improved dexterity of the Da Vinci robotic system provides a good opportunity to perform this challenging procedure in the minimally invasive context. The aim of this study was to share our preliminary experience of totally robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. From April 2015 to August 2015, four patients were selected to undergo totally robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy in the Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China. The demographic characteristics, perioperative details, and pathological results were retrospectively reviewed. One female and two male patients underwent totally robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy, while another male patient underwent robotic total pancreatectomy due to the severe atrophy of pancreatic body and tail. The mean age of the four patients was 56.8 years. The average operation time and intraoperative blood loss were 563 min and 228 mL, respectively. No one needed blood transfusion, conversion to open pancreaticoduodenectomy, or postoperative analgesia. The postoperative courses of these patients were uneventful. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 10 days. No one required to be readmitted, and there was no death within 30 days following the surgery. Final pathologic examinations revealed one malignant pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, and three benign lesions. Based on this initial study, robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy is safe and feasible, with acceptable oncological outcomes for highly selected patients in experienced surgeons' hands. However, concerns such as long-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness analysis, and learning curve analysis should be fully demonstrated before the popularization of this challenging procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Da Vinci; Minimally invasive surgery; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Total pancreatectomy

Year:  2016        PMID: 29581684      PMCID: PMC5866800          DOI: 10.1007/s12262-016-1555-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg        ISSN: 0973-9793            Impact factor:   0.656


  25 in total

1.  Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: results of a multicenter European study of 127 patients.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Mabrut; Laureano Fernandez-Cruz; Juan Santiago Azagra; Claudio Bassi; Georges Delvaux; Joseph Weerts; Jean-Michel Fabre; Jean Boulez; Jacques Baulieux; Jean-Louis Peix; Jean-François Gigot
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Matched Case-Control Analysis Comparing Laparoscopic and Open Pylorus-preserving Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Patients With Periampullary Tumors.

Authors:  Ki Byung Song; Song Cheol Kim; Dae Wook Hwang; Jae Hoon Lee; Dong Joo Lee; Jung Woo Lee; Kwang-Min Park; Young-Joo Lee
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparative study at a single institution.

Authors:  Nicolas Christian Buchs; Pietro Addeo; Francesco Maria Bianco; Subhashini Ayloo; Enrico Benedetti; Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: single-surgeon experience.

Authors:  Mingjun Wang; Hua Zhang; Zhong Wu; Zhaoda Zhang; Bing Peng
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Robot-assisted pancreatic surgery: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Marin Strijker; Hjalmar C van Santvoort; Marc G Besselink; Richard van Hillegersberg; Inne H M Borel Rinkes; Menno R Vriens; I Quintus Molenaar
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience.

Authors:  Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti; Fabio Sbrana; Francesco Maria Bianco; Enrique Fernando Elli; Galaxy Shah; Pietro Addeo; Giuseppe Caravaglios; Andrea Coratti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-09       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Robotic versus open pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Wen-Ming Wu; Lei You; Yu-Pei Zhao
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic advantages over open approaches?

Authors:  Kristopher P Croome; Michael B Farnell; Florencia G Que; K Marie Reid-Lombardo; Mark J Truty; David M Nagorney; Michael L Kendrick
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Robotic and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a hybrid approach.

Authors:  Vimal K Narula; Dean J Mikami; W Scott Melvin
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.327

10.  Feasibility of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  U Boggi; S Signori; N De Lio; V G Perrone; F Vistoli; M Belluomini; C Cappelli; G Amorese; F Mosca
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  International consensus statement on robotic pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Rong Liu; Go Wakabayashi; Chinnusamy Palanivelu; Allan Tsung; Kehu Yang; Brian K P Goh; Charing Ching-Ning Chong; Chang Moo Kang; Chenghong Peng; Eli Kakiashvili; Ho-Seong Han; Hong-Jin Kim; Jin He; Jae Hoon Lee; Kyoichi Takaori; Marco Vito Marino; Shen-Nien Wang; Tiankang Guo; Thilo Hackert; Ting-Shuo Huang; Yiengpruksawan Anusak; Yuman Fong; Yuichi Nagakawa; Yi-Ming Shyr; Yao-Ming Wu; Yupei Zhao
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 7.293

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.