Literature DB >> 23247737

Laparoscopy versus open distal gastrectomy by expert surgeons for early gastric cancer in Japanese patients: short-term clinical outcomes of a randomized clinical trial.

Shinichi Sakuramoto1, Keishi Yamashita, Shiro Kikuchi, Nobue Futawatari, Natsuya Katada, Masahiko Watanabe, Toshiyuki Okutomi, Guoqin Wang, Leon Bax.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Short-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) and open DG (ODG) have been investigated in previous clinical trials, but operative techniques and concomitant treatments have evolved, and up-to-date evidence produced by expert surgeons is required to provide an accurate image of the relative efficacies of the treatments. The purpose of this study was to compare laparoscopic versus ODG with respect to specific primary and secondary short-term outcomes.
METHODS: From October 2005 to February 2008, a total of 64 patients with early gastric cancer were randomly assigned to the LADG or the ODG group. One patient was excluded due to concurrent illness unrelated to the intervention, so the data from 63 patients were analyzed. The primary short-term outcome was the 4-day postoperative use of analgesics. Secondary short-term outcomes were postoperative residual pain, complications, days hospitalized, blood data, days with fever, and days to first flatus.
RESULTS: There was a significant difference in favor of LADG for postoperative use of analgesics (P = 0.022). Unexpectedly, there was no significant difference in degree of pain in the immediate postoperative period, putatively due to the optimal use of analgesics. Of the secondary outcomes, residual pain at postoperative day 7 (P = 0.003) and days to first flatus (P = 0.001) were significantly better with LADG. Postoperative complications, number of days hospitalized, and number of days with fever were also better with LADG, but the differences were not significant. Blood data representing inflammation (WBC and CRP) showed marked differences, especially on postoperative day 7 (P = 0.0016 and P = 0.0061, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: LADG performed by expert surgeons results in less postoperative pain accompanied by decreased surgical invasiveness and is associated with fewer postoperative inconveniences. No preliminary suggestions of changes in long-term curability were observed. LADG for early gastric cancer is a feasible and safe procedure with short-term clinical results superior to those of ODG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23247737     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2658-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  31 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: evidence from randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Yi-Ke Zeng; Zu-Li Yang; Jun-Sheng Peng; Han-Sheng Lin; Ling Cai
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth-I gastrectomy (LADG) for cancer: our 10 years' experience.

Authors:  Seigo Kitano; Norio Shiraishi; Kenji Kakisako; Kazuhiro Yasuda; Masafumi Inomata; Yosuke Adachi
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.719

3.  Survival outcome of laparoscopic gastrectomy for clinical early (cT1) gastric cancer.

Authors:  Keishi Yamashita; Shinichi Sakuramoto; Tomotaka Shibata; Masayuki Nemoto; Hiroaki Mieno; Natsuya Katada; Shiro Kikuchi; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-10-28       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with systemic lymph node dissection: a phase II study following the learning curve.

Authors:  Michitaka Fujiwara; Yasuhiro Kodera; Shinichi Miura; Yasuaki Kanyama; Hiroyuki Yokoyama; Norifumi Ohashi; Kenji Hibi; Katsuki Ito; Seiji Akiyama; Akimasa Nakao
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  Prospective randomized study of open versus laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with extraperigastric lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  H Hayashi; T Ochiai; H Shimada; Y Gunji
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Long-term oncologic outcomes from laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a single-center experience of 601 consecutive resections.

Authors:  Sang-Woong Lee; Eiji Nomura; George Bouras; Takaya Tokuhara; Souichiro Tsunemi; Nobuhiko Tanigawa
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and high-quality nonrandomized studies.

Authors:  Eduardo F Viñuela; Mithat Gonen; Murray F Brennan; Daniel G Coit; Vivian E Strong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Completely laparoscopic extraperigastric lymph node dissection for gastric malignancies located in the middle or lower third of the stomach.

Authors:  Ichiro Uyama; Atsushi Sugioka; Junko Fujita; Yoshiyuki Komori; Hideo Matsui; Ryohei Soga; Atsushi Wakayama; Kiichiro Okamoto; Akihiro Ohyama; Akitake Hasumi
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 7.370

9.  Laparoscopic gastrectomy for early gastric cancer targeting as a less invasive procedure.

Authors:  Hideki Kawamura; Kuniaki Okada; Hiroyuki Isizu; Hiroyuki Masuko; Hideki Yamagami; Shigenori Honma; Shinya Ueki; Keita Noguchi; Yukifumi Kondo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Learning curve for laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with regional lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Chikara Kunisaki; Hirochika Makino; Naoto Yamamoto; Tsutomu Sato; Takashi Oshima; Yasuhiko Nagano; Syoichi Fujii; Hirotoshi Akiyama; Yuichi Otsuka; Hidetaka A Ono; Takashi Kosaka; Ryo Takagawa; Hiroshi Shimada
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.719

View more
  41 in total

Review 1.  A comparison of surgical procedures and postoperative cares for minimally invasive laparoscopic gastrectomy and open gastrectomy in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hong-Na Tang; Jun-Hong Hu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

Review 2.  Laparoscopic and robot-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Current considerations.

Authors:  Stefano Caruso; Alberto Patriti; Franco Roviello; Lorenzo De Franco; Franco Franceschini; Andrea Coratti; Graziano Ceccarelli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer in UK: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Muhammad Shafique Sajid; Madhusoodhana Hebbar; Mazin E Sayegh
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-05-09

Review 4.  A systematic review of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Chikara Kunisaki; Hirochika Makino; Ryo Takagawa; Jun Kimura; Mitsuyoshi Ota; Yasushi Ichikawa; Takashi Kosaka; Hirotoshi Akiyama; Itaru Endo
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 7.370

5.  Surgical risk and benefits of laparoscopic surgery for elderly patients with gastric cancer: a multicenter prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Michitaka Honda; Hiraku Kumamaru; Tsuyoshi Etoh; Hiroaki Miyata; Yuichi Yamashita; Kazuhiro Yoshida; Yasuhiro Kodera; Yoshihiro Kakeji; Masafumi Inomata; Hiroyuki Konno; Yasuyuki Seto; Seigo Kitano; Masahiko Watanabe; Naoki Hiki
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 6.  Three-dimensional computed tomography simulation for laparoscopic lymph node dissection in the treatment of proximal gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hideki Sunagawa; Takahiro Kinoshita
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-05-26

7.  Potential benefits of laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy with esophagogastrostomy for cT1 upper-third gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kei Hosoda; Keishi Yamashita; Natsuya Katada; Hiromitsu Moriya; Hiroaki Mieno; Tomotaka Shibata; Shinichi Sakuramoto; Shiro Kikuchi; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Long-term prognostic outcome of cT1 gastric cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy after 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Keishi Yamashita; Kei Hosoda; Hiromitsu Moriya; Hiroaki Mieno; Natsuya Katada; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: single-surgeon experience.

Authors:  Mingjun Wang; Hua Zhang; Zhong Wu; Zhaoda Zhang; Bing Peng
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Minimally Invasive Gastric Surgery.

Authors:  Gabriel Herrera-Almario; Vivian E Strong
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.