| Literature DB >> 25781024 |
Michael Syka1, Jiří Keller2, Jiří Klempíř3, Aaron M Rulseh4, Jan Roth5, Robert Jech5, Ivan Vorisek6, Josef Vymazal7.
Abstract
Huntington's disease (HD) is an inherited neurodegenerative disorder with progressive impairment of motor, behavioral and cognitive functions. The clinical features of HD are closely related to the degeneration of the basal ganglia, predominantly the striatum. The main striatal output structure, the globus pallidus, strongly accumulates metalloprotein-bound iron, which was recently shown to influence the diffusion tensor scalar values. To test the hypothesis that this effect dominates in the iron-rich basal ganglia of HD patients, we examined the globus pallidus using DTI and T2 relaxometry sequences. Quantitative magnetic resonance (MR), clinical and genetic data (number of CAG repeats) were obtained from 14 HD patients. MR parameters such as the T2 relaxation rate (RR), fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) were analysed. A positive correlation was found between RR and FA (R2=0.84), between CAG and RR (R2=0.59) and between CAG and FA (R2=0.44). A negative correlation was observed between RR and MD (R2=0.66). A trend towards correlation between CAG and MD was noted. No correlation between MR and clinical parameters was found. Our results indicate that especially magnetic resonance FA measurements in the globus pallidus of HD patients may be strongly affected by metalloprotein-bound iron accumulation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25781024 PMCID: PMC4362949 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118907
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1ROIs definition.
The placement of the ROI masks on the CPMG sequence (right) and their projection on the co-registered MD map in an HD patient (left).
The clinical and genetic data obtained from HD patients.
| Patient number | TFC value | UHDRS value | CAG count | HD duration (years) | Age (years) | Sex |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | 30 | 48 | 3 | 36 | M |
| 2 | 2 | 80 | 44 | 8 | 49 | F |
| 3 | 8 | 15 | 42 | 2 | 54 | M |
| 4 | 1 | 24 | 43 | 4 | 56 | F |
| 5 | 7 | 10 | 39 | 10 | 58 | M |
| 6 | 10 | 9 | 44 | 2 | 28 | M |
| 7 | 7 | 15 | 40 | 7 | 68 | M |
| 8 | 12 | 23 | 54 | 2 | 31 | F |
| 9 | 3 | 13 | 44 | 8 | 41 | F |
| 10 | 13 | 24 | 42 | 3 | 58 | M |
| 11 | 5 | 29 | 42 | 6 | 61 | F |
| 12 | 3 | 22 | 45 | 12 | 54 | F |
| 13 | 4 | 24 | 43 | 9 | 44 | F |
| 14 | 7 | 20 | 43 | 6 | 56 | M |
The relaxometry data—mean RR (s) and the diffusion data—FA (without units) and MD (mms) obtained from the pallidum (GP) of HD patients and healthy controls with the corresponding standard deviations (SD).
| LEFT GP | RR | RR (SD) | FA | FA (SD) | MD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| patients—1. observer | 17.57 | 2.99 | 0.46 | 0.13 | 0.000611 |
| patients—2. observer | 16.41 | 2.10 | 0.45 | 0.17 | 0.000595 |
| patients—average of observers | 16.85 | 2.52 | 0.44 | 0.15 | 0.000609 |
| healthy controls | 15.04 | 0.57 | 0.37 | 0.07 | 0.000647 |
Statistical data obtained for the correlations of the results from HD patients—P values with the FDR correction for multiple comparisons and R2 values.
| Correlation | P value | FDR | R2 value | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| FA x UHDRS | 0.052 | 0.017 | 0.27 | not significant |
| FA x TFC | 0.276 | 0.04 | 0.06 | not significant |
| FA x Age | 0.155 | 0.031 | 0.16 | not significant |
| FA x Onset | 0.234 | 0.038 | 0.11 | not significant |
| FA x Duration | 0.297 | 0.043 | 0.09 | not significant |
| MD x UHDRS | 0.138 | 0.029 | 0.17 | not significant |
| MD x TFC | 0.097 | 0.021 | 0.20 | not significant |
| MD x Age | 0.137 | 0.024 | 0.17 | not significant |
| MD x Onset | 0.309 | 0.045 | 0.08 | not significant |
| MD x Duration | 0.056 | 0.019 | 0.27 | not significant |
| RR x UHDRS | 0.170 | 0.033 | 0.15 | not significant |
| RR x TFC | 0.373 | 0.050 | 0.02 | not significant |
| RR x Age | 0.138 | 0.026 | 0.17 | not significant |
| RR x Onset | 0.212 | 0.036 | 0.13 | not significant |
| RR x Duration | 0.319 | 0.048 | 0.08 | not significant |
The correlation is considered to be significant if P<0.05 and at the same time P
Fig 2Correlation of relaxometry and diffusion parameters.
The graphs describe the correlation between the relaxometry and diffusion data obtained from the pallidum of HD patients with corresponding standard deviations (SD). Top: correlation between RR (1/T2) and FA, middle: correlation between RR (1/T2) and MD, bottom: correlation between FA and MD.
Fig 3Correlation of MR data and number of CAG triplets.
The graphs show the correlation between the MR data obtained from the pallidum of HD patients and the number of CAG triplet repeats. Top: correlation between RR (1/T2) and CAG, bottom: correlation between FA and CAG.
Fig 4MR data in HD patients and healthy controls.
The comparison of the MR data obtained from the pallidum of HD patients with the MR data obtained from the pallidum of healthy controls; the corresponding medians and average standard deviations are included. Top: comparison of RR (1/T2), middle: comparison of FA, bottom: comparison of MD.