Literature DB >> 25767749

Do provider attitudes about electronic health records predict future electronic health record use?

Tara F Bishop, Mandy Smith Ryan, Colleen M McCullough, Sarah C Shih, Lawrence P Casalino, Andrew M Ryan.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Prior research has shown that provider attitudes about EHRs are associated with successful adoption. There is no evidence on whether comfort with technology and more positive attitudes about EHRs affect use of EHR functions once they are adopted.
METHODS: We used data from a survey of providers in the Primary Care Information Project, a bureau of the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene and measures of use from their EHRs. The main predictor variables were scores on three indices: comfort with computers, positive attitudes about EHRs, and negative attitudes about EHRs. The main outcome measures were four measures of use of EHR functions. We used linear regression models to test the association between the three indices and measures of EHR use.
RESULTS: The mean comfort with computers score was 2.37 (SD0.53) on a scale of 1-3 with 3 being the most comfortable. The mean positive attitude score was 2.74 (SD 0.40) on a scale of 1-3 with 3 being more positive. The mean negative attitude score was 1.81 (SD 0.54) on a scale of 1-3 with 3 being more negative. Within the first twelve months of having the EHR, 59.5% of visits had allergy information entered into a structured field, 64.8% had medications reviewed, and 74.3% had blood pressured entered. Among visits with a prescription generated, 24.5% had prescriptions electronically. In multivariate regression analysis, we found no significant correlations between comfort with computers, positive attitudes about EHRs, or negative attitudes about EHRs and any of the measures of use. DISCUSSION: Comfort with computers and attitudes about EHRs did not predict future use of the EHR functions. Our findings suggest that meaningful use of the EHR may not be affected by providers' prior attitudes about EHRs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25767749      PMCID: PMC4353478          DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2014.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthc (Amst)        ISSN: 2213-0764


  15 in total

1.  Academic health centers: exploring a financial paradox.

Authors:  G F Anderson; G Greenberg; C K Lisk
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Electronic health records' limited successes suggest more targeted uses.

Authors:  Catherine M DesRoches; Eric G Campbell; Christine Vogeli; Jie Zheng; Sowmya R Rao; Alexandra E Shields; Karen Donelan; Sara Rosenbaum; Steffanie J Bristol; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  A framework for predicting EHR adoption attitudes: a physician survey.

Authors:  Mary E Morton; Susan Wiedenbeck
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2009-09-16

Review 4.  Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care.

Authors:  Basit Chaudhry; Jerome Wang; Shinyi Wu; Margaret Maglione; Walter Mojica; Elizabeth Roth; Sally C Morton; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Physicians and electronic health records: a statewide survey.

Authors:  Steven R Simon; Rainu Kaushal; Paul D Cleary; Chelsea A Jenter; Lynn A Volk; E John Orav; Elisabeth Burdick; Eric G Poon; David W Bates
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-03-12

6.  Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Linder; Jun Ma; David W Bates; Blackford Middleton; Randall S Stafford
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-07-09

7.  Costs and benefits of health information technology: new trends from the literature.

Authors:  Caroline Lubick Goldzweig; Ali Towfigh; Margaret Maglione; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 8.  Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions.

Authors:  Albert Boonstra; Manda Broekhuis
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Electronic health record components and the quality of care.

Authors:  Salomeh Keyhani; Paul L Hebert; Joseph S Ross; Alex Federman; Carolyn W Zhu; Albert L Siu
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Effectiveness of the electronic medical record in improving the management of hypertension.

Authors:  James W Kinn; Joseph C Marek; Michael F O'Toole; Stephen M Rowley; Vincent J Bufalino
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.738

View more
  4 in total

1.  A Two-Year Longitudinal Assessment of Ophthalmologists' Perceptions after Implementing an Electronic Health Record System.

Authors:  Joshua R Ehrlich; Monica Michelotti; Taylor S Blachley; Kai Zheng; Mick P Couper; Grant M Greenberg; Sharon Kileny; Greta L Branford; David A Hanauer; Jennifer S Weizer
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  Potential Effects of the Electronic Health Record on the Small Physician Practice: A Delphi Study.

Authors:  Chad C Sines; Gerald R Griffin
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2017-04-01

3.  Provider Use of a Novel EHR display in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. Large Customizable Interactive Monitor (LCIM).

Authors:  Onur Asan; Richard J Holden; Kathryn E Flynn; Yushi Yang; Laila Azam; Matthew C Scanlon
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 2.342

4.  Consultation analysis: use of free text versus coded text.

Authors:  Pablo Millares Martin
Journal:  Health Technol (Berl)       Date:  2021-01-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.