Literature DB >> 19300317

Electronic health record components and the quality of care.

Salomeh Keyhani1, Paul L Hebert, Joseph S Ross, Alex Federman, Carolyn W Zhu, Albert L Siu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Electronic health records (EHRs) have been promoted as an important tool to improve quality of care. We examined the association between EHR components, a complete EHR, and the quality of care.
METHODS: Using data from the 2005 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis of all visits with an established primary care provider and examined the association between presence of EHR components and: (1) blood pressure control; and (2) receipt of appropriate therapy for chronic conditions. We examined similar associations for complete EHRs which we defined as one that includes physician and nursing notes, electronic reminder system, computerized prescription order entry, test results, and computerized test order entry. We constructed multivariate models to examine the association between EHR components and each outcome controlling for patient sociodemographic, health, physician practice, and geographic factors.
RESULTS: We found no association between electronic physician notes and blood pressure control or receipt of appropriate therapies, with the exception of inhaled steroids among asthmatics (adjusted odds ratio 2.86; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-7.32). We found no association between electronic reminder systems and blood pressure control or receipt of appropriate therapies, with the exception of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with diabetes with hypertension (odds ratio 2.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-5.42). We found no association between electronic physician notes and any measure of quality. We found no relationship between having a complete EHR and any of the quality measures investigated.
CONCLUSIONS: We found no consistent association between blood pressure control, management of chronic conditions, and specific EHR components. Future research focusing on how an EHR is implemented and used and how care is integrated through an EHR will improve our understanding of the impact of EHRs on the quality of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19300317     DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817e18ae

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  28 in total

1.  Use of health information technology by office-based physicians: comparison of two contemporaneous public-use physician surveys.

Authors:  Chenghui Li
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2011-10-01

2.  Organization's quality maturity as a vehicle for EHR success.

Authors:  Zahra Meidani; Farhnaz Sadoughi; Mohammad Reza Maleki; Shahram Tofighi; Ahmad Barati Marani
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  An information systems model of the determinants of electronic health record use.

Authors:  P Messeri; S Khan; M Millery; A Campbell; J Merrill; S Shih; R Kukafka
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 4.  The impact of the electronic medical record on structure, process, and outcomes within primary care: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Jayna M Holroyd-Leduc; Diane Lorenzetti; Sharon E Straus; Lindsay Sykes; Hude Quan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Evaluation of a systematic methodology to detect in near real-time performance changes during electronic health record system implementations: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Tiago K Colicchio; Guilherme Del Fiol; Greg J Stoddard; Scott P Narus
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

6.  Assessing automated extraction of prognostic information for intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Marc D Silverstein
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Measurement error in performance studies of health information technology: lessons from the management literature.

Authors:  A S Litwin; A C Avgar; P J Pronovost
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 2.342

8.  A clinically guided approach for improving performance measurement for hypertension.

Authors:  Michael A Steinman; Sei J Lee; Carolyn A Peterson; Kathy Z Fung; Mary K Goldstein
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Do provider attitudes about electronic health records predict future electronic health record use?

Authors:  Tara F Bishop; Mandy Smith Ryan; Colleen M McCullough; Sarah C Shih; Lawrence P Casalino; Andrew M Ryan
Journal:  Healthc (Amst)       Date:  2015-03

Review 10.  Healthcare reform, quality, and technology: ADHD as a case study.

Authors:  Rebecca A Baum; Jeffery N Epstein; Kelly Kelleher
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.