Literature DB >> 12461305

Effectiveness of the electronic medical record in improving the management of hypertension.

James W Kinn1, Joseph C Marek, Michael F O'Toole, Stephen M Rowley, Vincent J Bufalino.   

Abstract

Clinical studies suggest that hypertension is often undiagnosed, undertreated, and poorly controlled. In 1997, the authors developed a comprehensive electronic medical record that interfaces with physicians during each outpatient visit and provides real-time feedback about patient care management, including the management of hypertension. The purpose of this study was to determine whether this interactive electronic medical record results in better detection and control of hypertension. During a 12-month study period, consecutive outpatients (n=1076) were seen for routine follow-up; patient care documentation relied solely on the electronic medical record. Quality indicators for hypertension included: 1) documentation of the diagnosis of hypertension; 2) use of blood pressure-lowering drugs; and 3) successful blood pressure lowering to < or =140/90 mm Hg. The authors compared the hypertension management of these patients to a control group of similar patients (n=723) with medical records consisting solely of traditional pen and paper charts. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups, including the prevalence of hypertension (73% vs. 70%; p=NS). However, the electronic medical record resulted in higher documentation rates of hypertension (90% vs. 77%; p<0.001), greater use of antihypertensive therapy (94% vs. 90%; p<0.01), and more successful blood pressure lowering to < or =140/90 mm Hg (54% vs. 28%; p<0.001). In conclusion, the electronic medical record with real-time feedback improves the physicians ability to detect, treat, and control hypertension. Copyright 2002 Le Jacq Communications, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12461305      PMCID: PMC8101825          DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2002.01248.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  5 in total

1.  The fifth report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC V)

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1993-01-25

2.  The sixth report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1997-11-24

3.  Prevalence of hypertension in the US adult population. Results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1991.

Authors:  V L Burt; P Whelton; E J Roccella; C Brown; J A Cutler; M Higgins; M J Horan; D Labarthe
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 10.190

4.  Trends in the prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the adult US population. Data from the health examination surveys, 1960 to 1991.

Authors:  V L Burt; J A Cutler; M Higgins; M J Horan; D Labarthe; P Whelton; C Brown; E J Roccella
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 10.190

5.  Stroke incidence, prevalence, and survival: secular trends in Rochester, Minnesota, through 1989.

Authors:  R D Brown; J P Whisnant; J D Sicks; W M O'Fallon; D O Wiebers
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 7.914

  5 in total
  9 in total

Review 1.  Computer-assisted technology: not if, not when, but how. A systematic review of interactive computer-assisted technology in diabetes care.

Authors:  Jaan Sidorov
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Getting physicians to accept new information technology: insights from case studies.

Authors:  Liette Lapointe; Suzanne Rivard
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Research at the Point of Care: Using Electronic Medical Record Systems to Generate Clinically Meaningful Evidence.

Authors:  Ashley N Marshall; Kenneth C Lam
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Small physician practices in new york needed sustained help to realize gains in quality from use of electronic health records.

Authors:  Andrew M Ryan; Tara F Bishop; Sarah Shih; Lawrence P Casalino
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Do provider attitudes about electronic health records predict future electronic health record use?

Authors:  Tara F Bishop; Mandy Smith Ryan; Colleen M McCullough; Sarah C Shih; Lawrence P Casalino; Andrew M Ryan
Journal:  Healthc (Amst)       Date:  2015-03

Review 6.  Quality of life and antihypertensive drug therapy.

Authors:  Joel Handler
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Improved medical records improve hypertension management: a wake up call to payers and providers.

Authors:  Joseph L Izzo
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Extracting research-quality phenotypes from electronic health records to support precision medicine.

Authors:  Wei-Qi Wei; Joshua C Denny
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 11.117

9.  Strategies for establishing policy, environmental, and systems-level interventions for managing high blood pressure and high cholesterol in health care settings: a qualitative case study.

Authors:  Dyann Matson Koffman; Sharon A Granade; Victoria V Anwuri
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 2.830

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.