Literature DB >> 27453191

Provider Use of a Novel EHR display in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. Large Customizable Interactive Monitor (LCIM).

Onur Asan1, Richard J Holden, Kathryn E Flynn, Yushi Yang, Laila Azam, Matthew C Scanlon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to explore providers' perspectives on the use of a novel technology, "Large Customizable Interactive Monitor" (LCIM), a novel application of the electronic health record system implemented in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.
METHODS: We employed a qualitative approach to collect and analyze data from pediatric intensive care physicians, pediatric nurse practitioners, and acute care specialists. Using semi-structured interviews, we collected data from January to April, 2015. The research team analyzed the transcripts using an iterative coding method to identify common themes.
RESULTS: Study results highlight contextual data on providers' use routines of the LCIM. Findings from thirty six interviews were classified into three groups: 1) providers' familiarity with the LCIM; 2) providers' use routines (i.e. when and how they use it); and 3) reasons why they use or do not use it.
CONCLUSION: It is important to conduct baseline studies of the use of novel technologies. The importance of training and orientation affects the adoption and use patterns of this new technology. This study is notable for being the first to investigate a LCIM system, a next generation system implemented in the pediatric critical care setting. Our study revealed this next generation HIT might have great potential for family-centered rounds, team education during rounds, and family education/engagement in their child's health in the patient room. This study also highlights the effect of training and orientation on the adoption patterns of new technology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health information technology; clinical information systems/testing and evaluation; pediatric intensive care units; workflow

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27453191      PMCID: PMC5052542          DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2016-02-RA-0030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Clin Inform        ISSN: 1869-0327            Impact factor:   2.342


  37 in total

1.  Electronic health records in small physician practices: availability, use, and perceived benefits.

Authors:  Sowmya R Rao; Catherine M Desroches; Karen Donelan; Eric G Campbell; Paola D Miralles; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Smartphone apps as a source of cancer information: changing trends in health information-seeking behavior.

Authors:  Ambarish Pandey; Sayeedul Hasan; Divyanshu Dubey; Sasmit Sarangi
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Automation and adaptation: Nurses' problem-solving behavior following the implementation of bar coded medication administration technology.

Authors:  Richard J Holden; A Joy Rivera-Rodriguez; Héléne Faye; Matthew C Scanlon; Ben-Tzion Karsh
Journal:  Cogn Technol Work       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 2.372

4.  Electronic health record functionality needed to better support primary care.

Authors:  Alex H Krist; John W Beasley; Jesse C Crosson; David C Kibbe; Michael S Klinkman; Christoph U Lehmann; Chester H Fox; Jason M Mitchell; James W Mold; Wilson D Pace; Kevin A Peterson; Robert L Phillips; Robert Post; Jon Puro; Michael Raddock; Ray Simkus; Steven E Waldren
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  An evaluation of the usability of a computerized decision support system for nursing homes.

Authors:  M Fossum; M Ehnfors; A Fruhling; A Ehrenberg
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 6.  Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature.

Authors:  Kristiina Häyrinen; Kaija Saranto; Pirkko Nykänen
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 4.046

7.  Physicians' beliefs about using EMR and CPOE: in pursuit of a contextualized understanding of health IT use behavior.

Authors:  Richard J Holden
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 4.046

8.  Enhancing patient safety and quality of care by improving the usability of electronic health record systems: recommendations from AMIA.

Authors:  Blackford Middleton; Meryl Bloomrosen; Mark A Dente; Bill Hashmat; Ross Koppel; J Marc Overhage; Thomas H Payne; S Trent Rosenbloom; Charlotte Weaver; Jiajie Zhang
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 9.  Patient engagement in the inpatient setting: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jennifer E Prey; Janet Woollen; Lauren Wilcox; Alexander D Sackeim; George Hripcsak; Suzanne Bakken; Susan Restaino; Steven Feiner; David K Vawdrey
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Understanding differences in electronic health record (EHR) use: linking individual physicians' perceptions of uncertainty and EHR use patterns in ambulatory care.

Authors:  Holly Jordan Lanham; Dean F Sittig; Luci K Leykum; Michael L Parchman; Jacqueline A Pugh; Reuben R McDaniel
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 4.497

View more
  5 in total

1.  Graphical Presentations of Clinical Data in a Learning Electronic Medical Record.

Authors:  Luca Calzoni; Gilles Clermont; Gregory F Cooper; Shyam Visweswaran; Harry Hochheiser
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  Training to Optimize Collaborative Use of an Inpatient Portal.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hefner; Cynthia J Sieck; Ann Scheck McAlearney
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Association between ICU interruptions and physicians trainees' electronic health records efficiency.

Authors:  Saif Khairat; Eman Metwally; Cameron Coleman; Elaine James; Samantha Eaker; Thomas Bice
Journal:  Inform Health Soc Care       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.082

4.  Nurses' perceptions, acceptance, and use of a novel in-room pediatric ICU technology: testing an expanded technology acceptance model.

Authors:  Richard J Holden; Onur Asan; Erica M Wozniak; Kathryn E Flynn; Matthew C Scanlon
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Providers' assessment of a novel interactive health information technology in a pediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  Onur Asan; Richard J Holden; Kathryn E Flynn; Kathy Murkowski; Matthew C Scanlon
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2018-06-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.