Onur Asan1, Richard J Holden, Kathryn E Flynn, Yushi Yang, Laila Azam, Matthew C Scanlon. 1. Onur Asan, PhD, Center for Patient Care and Outcomes Research, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, Phone: +14149558815, Fax: +14149556689, Email: oasan@mcw.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to explore providers' perspectives on the use of a novel technology, "Large Customizable Interactive Monitor" (LCIM), a novel application of the electronic health record system implemented in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. METHODS: We employed a qualitative approach to collect and analyze data from pediatric intensive care physicians, pediatric nurse practitioners, and acute care specialists. Using semi-structured interviews, we collected data from January to April, 2015. The research team analyzed the transcripts using an iterative coding method to identify common themes. RESULTS: Study results highlight contextual data on providers' use routines of the LCIM. Findings from thirty six interviews were classified into three groups: 1) providers' familiarity with the LCIM; 2) providers' use routines (i.e. when and how they use it); and 3) reasons why they use or do not use it. CONCLUSION: It is important to conduct baseline studies of the use of novel technologies. The importance of training and orientation affects the adoption and use patterns of this new technology. This study is notable for being the first to investigate a LCIM system, a next generation system implemented in the pediatric critical care setting. Our study revealed this next generation HIT might have great potential for family-centered rounds, team education during rounds, and family education/engagement in their child's health in the patient room. This study also highlights the effect of training and orientation on the adoption patterns of new technology.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to explore providers' perspectives on the use of a novel technology, "Large Customizable Interactive Monitor" (LCIM), a novel application of the electronic health record system implemented in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. METHODS: We employed a qualitative approach to collect and analyze data from pediatric intensive care physicians, pediatric nurse practitioners, and acute care specialists. Using semi-structured interviews, we collected data from January to April, 2015. The research team analyzed the transcripts using an iterative coding method to identify common themes. RESULTS: Study results highlight contextual data on providers' use routines of the LCIM. Findings from thirty six interviews were classified into three groups: 1) providers' familiarity with the LCIM; 2) providers' use routines (i.e. when and how they use it); and 3) reasons why they use or do not use it. CONCLUSION: It is important to conduct baseline studies of the use of novel technologies. The importance of training and orientation affects the adoption and use patterns of this new technology. This study is notable for being the first to investigate a LCIM system, a next generation system implemented in the pediatric critical care setting. Our study revealed this next generation HIT might have great potential for family-centered rounds, team education during rounds, and family education/engagement in their child's health in the patient room. This study also highlights the effect of training and orientation on the adoption patterns of new technology.
Entities:
Keywords:
Health information technology; clinical information systems/testing and evaluation; pediatric intensive care units; workflow
Authors: Sowmya R Rao; Catherine M Desroches; Karen Donelan; Eric G Campbell; Paola D Miralles; Ashish K Jha Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2011-05-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Richard J Holden; A Joy Rivera-Rodriguez; Héléne Faye; Matthew C Scanlon; Ben-Tzion Karsh Journal: Cogn Technol Work Date: 2013-08-01 Impact factor: 2.372
Authors: Alex H Krist; John W Beasley; Jesse C Crosson; David C Kibbe; Michael S Klinkman; Christoph U Lehmann; Chester H Fox; Jason M Mitchell; James W Mold; Wilson D Pace; Kevin A Peterson; Robert L Phillips; Robert Post; Jon Puro; Michael Raddock; Ray Simkus; Steven E Waldren Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2014-01-15 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Blackford Middleton; Meryl Bloomrosen; Mark A Dente; Bill Hashmat; Ross Koppel; J Marc Overhage; Thomas H Payne; S Trent Rosenbloom; Charlotte Weaver; Jiajie Zhang Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-01-25 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Jennifer E Prey; Janet Woollen; Lauren Wilcox; Alexander D Sackeim; George Hripcsak; Suzanne Bakken; Susan Restaino; Steven Feiner; David K Vawdrey Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-11-22 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Holly Jordan Lanham; Dean F Sittig; Luci K Leykum; Michael L Parchman; Jacqueline A Pugh; Reuben R McDaniel Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-05-22 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Saif Khairat; Eman Metwally; Cameron Coleman; Elaine James; Samantha Eaker; Thomas Bice Journal: Inform Health Soc Care Date: 2021-02-18 Impact factor: 3.082
Authors: Richard J Holden; Onur Asan; Erica M Wozniak; Kathryn E Flynn; Matthew C Scanlon Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 2.796