Michael L Eisenberg1, Zhen Chen2, Aijun Ye3, Germaine M Buck Louis2. 1. Departments of Urology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University, Stanford, California. Electronic address: eisenberg@stanford.edu. 2. Division of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Rockville, Maryland. 3. Glotec, Rockville, Maryland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To study the relationship among occupation, health, and semen quality in a cohort of men attempting to conceive. DESIGN: Observational prospective cohort. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): A total of 501 couples discontinuing contraception were followed for 1 year while trying to conceive; 473 men (94%) provided one semen sample, and 80% provided a second sample. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Semen data obtained through at-home semen collection with next-day analysis/quantification. RESULT(S): In all, complete data were available for 456 men, with a mean age of 31.8 years. Work-related heavy exertion was consistently associated with lower semen concentration and total sperm count. Thirteen percent of men who reported heavy exertion displayed oligospermia, compared with 6% who did not report workplace exertion. Shift work, night work, vibration, noise, heat, and prolonged sitting were not associated with semen quality. Men with high blood pressure had significantly lower strict morphology scores compared with normotensive men (17% vs. 21%). In contrast, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and composite of total comorbidities were not associated with semen quality. The number of medications a man was taking as a proxy of health status was associated with semen quality. There was a negative association between number of medications and sperm count. CONCLUSION(S): A negative relationship among occupational exertion, hypertension, and the number of medications with semen quality was identified. As these are potentially modifiable factors, further research should determine whether treatment or cessation may improve male fecundity.
OBJECTIVE: To study the relationship among occupation, health, and semen quality in a cohort of men attempting to conceive. DESIGN: Observational prospective cohort. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): A total of 501 couples discontinuing contraception were followed for 1 year while trying to conceive; 473 men (94%) provided one semen sample, and 80% provided a second sample. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Semen data obtained through at-home semen collection with next-day analysis/quantification. RESULT(S): In all, complete data were available for 456 men, with a mean age of 31.8 years. Work-related heavy exertion was consistently associated with lower semen concentration and total sperm count. Thirteen percent of men who reported heavy exertion displayed oligospermia, compared with 6% who did not report workplace exertion. Shift work, night work, vibration, noise, heat, and prolonged sitting were not associated with semen quality. Men with high blood pressure had significantly lower strict morphology scores compared with normotensive men (17% vs. 21%). In contrast, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and composite of total comorbidities were not associated with semen quality. The number of medications a man was taking as a proxy of health status was associated with semen quality. There was a negative association between number of medications and sperm count. CONCLUSION(S): A negative relationship among occupational exertion, hypertension, and the number of medications with semen quality was identified. As these are potentially modifiable factors, further research should determine whether treatment or cessation may improve male fecundity.
Authors: Germaine M Buck Louis; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Enrique F Schisterman; Anne M Sweeney; Courtney D Lynch; Robert E Gore-Langton; Zhen Chen; Sungduk Kim; Kathleen L Caldwell; Dana Boyd Barr Journal: Chemosphere Date: 2012-02-04 Impact factor: 7.086
Authors: Germaine M Buck Louis; Enrique F Schisterman; Anne M Sweeney; Timothy C Wilcosky; Robert E Gore-Langton; Courtney D Lynch; Dana Boyd Barr; Steven M Schrader; Sungduk Kim; Zhen Chen; Rajeshwari Sundaram Journal: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol Date: 2011-06-20 Impact factor: 3.980
Authors: T Bobbert; K Mai; L Brechtel; H M Schulte; B Weger; A F H Pfeiffer; J Spranger; S Diederich Journal: Int J Sports Med Date: 2012-01-19 Impact factor: 3.118
Authors: Germaine M Buck Louis; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Enrique F Schisterman; Anne M Sweeney; Courtney D Lynch; Robert E Gore-Langton; José Maisog; Sungduk Kim; Zhen Chen; Dana B Barr Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2012-11-14 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Nanfu Deng; Nora M Haney; Taylor P Kohn; Alexander W Pastuszak; Larry I Lipshultz Journal: Curr Urol Rep Date: 2018-05-28 Impact factor: 3.092
Authors: Ryan C Lewis; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; John D Meeker; Paige L Williams; Gabor Mezei; Jennifer B Ford; Russ Hauser Journal: Reprod Toxicol Date: 2016-11-09 Impact factor: 3.143
Authors: Audrey J Gaskins; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Christina C Lawson; Eva S Schernhammer; Stacey A Missmer; Jorge E Chavarro Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2015-08-06 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Ryan C Lewis; Russ Hauser; Andrew D Maynard; Richard L Neitzel; Lu Wang; Robert Kavet; John D Meeker Journal: J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev Date: 2016 Impact factor: 6.393
Authors: Craig James McKinnon; Elizabeth Elliott Hatch; Olivia R Orta; Kenneth J Rothman; Michael L Eisenberg; Johanna Wefes-Potter; Lauren A Wise Journal: J Occup Health Psychol Date: 2021-07-29