Literature DB >> 27838386

Self-reported mobile phone use and semen parameters among men from a fertility clinic.

Ryan C Lewis1, Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón2, John D Meeker3, Paige L Williams4, Gabor Mezei5, Jennifer B Ford2, Russ Hauser6.   

Abstract

There is increasing concern that use of mobile phones, a source of low-level radio-frequency electromagnetic fields, may be associated with poor semen quality, but the epidemiologic evidence is limited and conflicting. The relationship between mobile phone use patterns and markers of semen quality was explored in a longitudinal cohort study of 153 men that attended an academic fertility clinic in Boston, Massachusetts. Information on mobile phone use duration, headset or earpiece use, and the body location in which the mobile phone was carried was ascertained via nurse-administered questionnaire. Semen samples (n=350) were collected and analyzed onsite. To account for multiple semen samples per man, linear mixed models with random intercepts were used to investigate the association between mobile phone use and semen parameters. Overall, there was no evidence for a relationship between mobile phone use and semen quality.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electromagnetic fields; Epidemiology; Longitudinal studies; Mobile phones; Reproductive health; Semen quality

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27838386      PMCID: PMC5303122          DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2016.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Toxicol        ISSN: 0890-6238            Impact factor:   3.143


  37 in total

Review 1.  Temporal trends in testosterone levels and treatment in older men.

Authors:  Thomas G Travison; Andre B Araujo; Susan A Hall; John B McKinlay
Journal:  Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.243

2.  Whole-body microwave exposure emitted by cellular phones and testicular function of rats.

Authors:  S Dasdag; M A Ketani; Z Akdag; A R Ersay; I Sari; O C Demirtas; M S Celik
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1999-06

3.  Semen quality and sperm DNA damage in relation to urinary bisphenol A among men from an infertility clinic.

Authors:  John D Meeker; Shelley Ehrlich; Thomas L Toth; Diane L Wright; Antonia M Calafat; Ana T Trisini; Xiaoyun Ye; Russ Hauser
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 3.143

Review 4.  Effects of the exposure to mobile phones on male reproduction: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Sandro La Vignera; Rosita A Condorelli; Enzo Vicari; Rosario D'Agata; Aldo E Calogero
Journal:  J Androl       Date:  2011-07-28

5.  Scrotal heat stress causes sperm chromatin damage and cysteinyl aspartate-spicific proteinases 3 changes in fertile men.

Authors:  Mei-Hua Zhang; Zhi-Da Shi; Jian-Chun Yu; Yan-Ping Zhang; Lei-Guang Wang; Yi Qiu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-02-22       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  The lack of histological changes of CDMA cellular phone-based radio frequency on rat testis.

Authors:  Hae-June Lee; Jeong-Ki Pack; Tae-Hong Kim; Nam Kim; Soo-Yong Choi; Jae-Seon Lee; Sung-Ho Kim; Yun-Sil Lee
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.010

7.  Relationship between physical occupational exposures and health on semen quality: data from the Longitudinal Investigation of Fertility and the Environment (LIFE) Study.

Authors:  Michael L Eisenberg; Zhen Chen; Aijun Ye; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 8.  World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics.

Authors:  Trevor G Cooper; Elizabeth Noonan; Sigrid von Eckardstein; Jacques Auger; H W Gordon Baker; Hermann M Behre; Trine B Haugen; Thinus Kruger; Christina Wang; Michael T Mbizvo; Kirsten M Vogelsong
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 15.610

9.  Effects of cellular phone emissions on sperm motility in rats.

Authors:  Ji-Geng Yan; Michael Agresti; Tim Bruce; Yu Hui Yan; Amy Granlund; Hani S Matloub
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Semen quality in fertile men in relation to psychosocial stress.

Authors:  Audra L Gollenberg; Fan Liu; Charlene Brazil; Erma Z Drobnis; David Guzick; James W Overstreet; James B Redmon; Amy Sparks; Christina Wang; Shanna H Swan
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  8 in total

1.  The association between urinary concentrations of phosphorous-containing flame retardant metabolites and semen parameters among men from a fertility clinic.

Authors:  Mary E Ingle; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Courtney C Carignan; Craig M Butt; Heather M Stapleton; Paige L Williams; Jennifer B Ford; Russ Hauser; John D Meeker
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 5.840

2.  Enhancement of X-ray Induced Apoptosis by Mobile Phone-Like Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields in Mouse Spermatocyte-Derived Cells.

Authors:  Ke-Ying Zhang; Hui Xu; Le Du; Jun-Ling Xing; Bin Zhang; Qiang-Shan Bai; Yu-Qiao Xu; Yong-Chun Zhou; Jun-Ping Zhang; Yan Zhou; Gui-Rong Ding
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  The Environment and Reproductive Health (EARTH) Study: A Prospective Preconception Cohort.

Authors:  Carmen Messerlian; Paige L Williams; Jennifer B Ford; Jorge E Chavarro; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Ramace Dadd; Joseph M Braun; Audrey J Gaskins; John D Meeker; Tamarra James-Todd; Yu-Han Chiu; Feiby L Nassan; Irene Souter; John Petrozza; Myra Keller; Thomas L Toth; Antonia M Calafat; Russ Hauser
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2018-02-20

4.  ART Registries-Characteristics and experiences: A comparative study.

Authors:  Maryam Zahmatkeshan; Majid Naghdi; Mojtaba Farjam; Mehrshad Mokhtaran; Azita Yazdani; Zahra Mahmoudvand; Reza Safdari
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2019-02

5.  Electromagnetic field in human sperm cryopreservation improves fertilizing potential of thawed sperm through physicochemical modification of water molecules in freezing medium.

Authors:  Dariush Gholami; Seyed Mahmood Ghaffari; Gholamhossein Riazi; Rouhollah Fathi; James Benson; Abdolhossein Shahverdi; Mohsen Sharafi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  The impact of selected modifiable lifestyle factors on male fertility in the modern world.

Authors:  Krzysztof Balawender; Stanisław Orkisz
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2020-10-10

7.  Male cellular telephone exposure, fecundability, and semen quality: results from two preconception cohort studies.

Authors:  E E Hatch; S K Willis; A K Wesselink; E M Mikkelsen; M L Eisenberg; G J Sommer; H T Sorensen; K J Rothman; L A Wise
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 8.  Risk of Accidents or Chronic Disorders From Improper Use of Mobile Phones: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xinxi Cao; Yangyang Cheng; Peng Jia; Yaogang Wang; Chenjie Xu; Yabing Hou; Hongxi Yang; Shu Li; Ying Gao
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 5.428

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.