Literature DB >> 21819423

Designing prospective cohort studies for assessing reproductive and developmental toxicity during sensitive windows of human reproduction and development--the LIFE Study.

Germaine M Buck Louis1, Enrique F Schisterman, Anne M Sweeney, Timothy C Wilcosky, Robert E Gore-Langton, Courtney D Lynch, Dana Boyd Barr, Steven M Schrader, Sungduk Kim, Zhen Chen, Rajeshwari Sundaram.   

Abstract

The relationship between the environment and human fecundity and fertility remains virtually unstudied from a couple-based perspective in which longitudinal exposure data and biospecimens are captured across sensitive windows. In response, we completed the LIFE Study with methodology that intended to empirically evaluate a priori purported methodological challenges: implementation of population-based sampling frameworks suitable for recruiting couples planning pregnancy; obtaining environmental data across sensitive windows of reproduction and development; home-based biospecimen collection; and development of a data management system for hierarchical exposome data. We used two sampling frameworks (i.e., fish/wildlife licence registry and a direct marketing database) for 16 targeted counties with presumed environmental exposures to persistent organochlorine chemicals to recruit 501 couples planning pregnancies for prospective longitudinal follow-up while trying to conceive and throughout pregnancy. Enrolment rates varied from <1% of the targeted population (n = 424,423) to 42% of eligible couples who were successfully screened; 84% of the targeted population could not be reached, while 36% refused screening. Among enrolled couples, ∼ 85% completed daily journals while trying; 82% of pregnant women completed daily early pregnancy journals, and 80% completed monthly pregnancy journals. All couples provided baseline blood/urine samples; 94% of men provided one or more semen samples and 98% of women provided one or more saliva samples. Women successfully used urinary fertility monitors for identifying ovulation and home pregnancy test kits. Couples can be recruited for preconception cohorts and will comply with intensive data collection across sensitive windows. However, appropriately sized sampling frameworks are critical, given the small percentage of couples contacted found eligible and reportedly planning pregnancy at any point in time. © Published 2011. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21819423      PMCID: PMC4118054          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2011.01205.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol        ISSN: 0269-5022            Impact factor:   3.980


  19 in total

1.  Accuracy of home pregnancy tests at the time of missed menses.

Authors:  Laurence A Cole; Sarah A Khanlian; Jaime M Sutton; Suzy Davies; William F Rayburn
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Feasibility of the current-duration approach to studying human fecundity.

Authors:  Rémy Slama; Béatrice Ducot; Lisbeth Carstensen; Christine Lorente; Elise de La Rochebrochard; Henri Leridon; Niels Keiding; Jean Bouyer
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 3.  Complementing the genome with an "exposome": the outstanding challenge of environmental exposure measurement in molecular epidemiology.

Authors:  Christopher Paul Wild
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Obesity is a risk factor for early pregnancy loss after IVF or ICSI.

Authors:  P Fedorcsák; R Storeng; P O Dale; T Tanbo; T Abyholm
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  A conceptual framework for the developmental origins of health and disease.

Authors:  P D Gluckman; M A Hanson; T Buklijas
Journal:  J Dev Orig Health Dis       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.401

6.  A global measure of perceived stress.

Authors:  S Cohen; T Kamarck; R Mermelstein
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1983-12

7.  A prospective study of early pregnancy loss.

Authors:  N J Ellish; K Saboda; J O'Connor; P C Nasca; E J Stanek; C Boyle
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Obesity and the risk of spontaneous abortion after oocyte donation.

Authors:  José Bellver; Luis P Rossal; Ernesto Bosch; Andrés Zúñiga; José T Corona; Fernando Meléndez; Emilio Gómez; Carlos Simón; José Remohí; Antonio Pellicer
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Polychlorinated biphenyl serum concentrations, lifestyle and time-to-pregnancy.

Authors:  G M Buck Louis; J Dmochowski; C Lynch; P Kostyniak; B M McGuinness; J E Vena
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Subfecundity in overweight and obese couples.

Authors:  C H Ramlau-Hansen; A M Thulstrup; E A Nohr; J P Bonde; T I A Sørensen; J Olsen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  107 in total

1.  Urinary concentrations of benzophenone-type ultraviolet radiation filters and couples' fecundity.

Authors:  Germaine M Buck Louis; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Katherine J Sapra; José Maisog; Rajeshwari Sundaram
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Heavy metals and couple fecundity, the LIFE Study.

Authors:  Germaine M Buck Louis; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Enrique F Schisterman; Anne M Sweeney; Courtney D Lynch; Robert E Gore-Langton; Zhen Chen; Sungduk Kim; Kathleen L Caldwell; Dana Boyd Barr
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 7.086

3.  Persistent organic pollutants and pregnancy complications.

Authors:  Melissa M Smarr; Katherine L Grantz; Cuilin Zhang; Rajeshwari Sundaram; José M Maisog; Dana Boyd Barr; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Success rates for consent and collection of prenatal biological specimens in an epidemiologic survey of child health.

Authors:  Omar A Abdul-Rahman; Beatriz Rodriguez; Sandra R Wadlinger; Julia Slutsman; Elizabeth B Boyle; Lori S Merrill; Jeffrey Botkin; Jack Moye
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2015-09-26

5.  Most Frequently Reported Prescription Medications and Supplements in Couples Planning Pregnancy: The LIFE Study.

Authors:  Kristin Palmsten; Katrina F Flores; Christina D Chambers; Lauren A Weiss; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.060

6.  Couples' body composition and time-to-pregnancy.

Authors:  Rajeshwari Sundaram; Sunni L Mumford; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Semen quality and pregnancy loss in a contemporary cohort of couples recruited before conception: data from the Longitudinal Investigation of Fertility and the Environment (LIFE) Study.

Authors:  Michael L Eisenberg; Katherine J Sapra; Sung Duk Kim; Zhen Chen; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Relationship between physical occupational exposures and health on semen quality: data from the Longitudinal Investigation of Fertility and the Environment (LIFE) Study.

Authors:  Michael L Eisenberg; Zhen Chen; Aijun Ye; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Time-to-Pregnancy Associated With Couples' Use of Tobacco Products.

Authors:  Katherine J Sapra; Dana B Barr; José M Maisog; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 4.244

10.  Couples' urinary concentrations of benzophenone-type ultraviolet filters and the secondary sex ratio.

Authors:  Jisuk Bae; Sungduk Kim; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 7.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.