Literature DB >> 25764558

Effect of progressive inoculation of fauna-free sheep with holotrich protozoa and total-fauna on rumen fermentation, microbial diversity and methane emissions.

Alejandro Belanche1, Gabriel de la Fuente1, Charles J Newbold2.   

Abstract

Rumen methanogenesis represents an energy waste for the ruminant and an important source of greenhouse gas; thus, integrated studies are needed to fully understand this process. Eight fauna-free sheep were used to investigate the effect of successive inoculation with holotrich protozoa then with total fauna on rumen methanogenesis. Holotrichs inoculation neither altered rumen fermentation rate nor diet digestibility, but increased concentrations of acetate (+15%), butyrate (+57%), anaerobic fungi (+0.82 log), methanogens (+0.41 log) and methanogenesis (+54%). Further inoculation with total fauna increased rumen concentrations of protozoa (+1.0 log), bacteria (+0.29 log), anaerobic fungi (+0.78 log), VFA (+8%), ammonia and fibre digestibility (+17%) without affecting levels of methanogens or methanogenesis. Rumen methanogens population was fairly stable in terms of structure and diversity, while the bacterial community was highly affected by the treatments. Inoculation with holotrich protozoa increased bacterial diversity. Further inoculation with total fauna lowered bacterial diversity but increased concentrations of certain propionate and lactate-producing bacteria, suggesting that alternative H2 sinks could be relevant. This experiment suggests that holotrich protozoa have a greater impact on rumen methanogenesis than entodiniomorphids. Thus, further research is warranted to understand the effect of holotrich protozoa on methane formation and evaluate their elimination from the rumen as a potential methane mitigation strategy. © Federation of European Microbiological Society 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  entodiniomorphids; fermentation; holotrichs; methanogenesis; methanogens; rumen protozoa

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25764558      PMCID: PMC4399445          DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiu026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol        ISSN: 0168-6496            Impact factor:   4.194


  40 in total

1.  Structures of free-living and protozoa-associated methanogen communities in the bovine rumen differ according to comparative analysis of 16S rRNA and mcrA genes.

Authors:  Lisa D Tymensen; Karen A Beauchemin; Tim A McAllister
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 2.777

2.  Long-term defaunation increases the abundance of cellulolytic ruminococci and methanogens but does not affect the bacterial and methanogen diversity in the rumen of sheep.

Authors:  P Mosoni; C Martin; E Forano; D P Morgavi
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Bacterial protein degradation by different rumen protozoal groups.

Authors:  A Belanche; G de la Fuente; J M Moorby; C J Newbold
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  The effect of absence of protozoa on rumen biohydrogenation and the fatty acid composition of lamb muscle.

Authors:  David R Yáñez-Ruiz; Selwyn Williams; Charles J Newbold
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.718

5.  Ruminal fermentation and duodenal flow following progressive inoculations of fauna-free wethers with major individual species of ciliate protozoa or total fauna.

Authors:  M Ivan; L Neill; T Entz
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 6.  Special topics--Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: I. A review of enteric methane mitigation options.

Authors:  A N Hristov; J Oh; J L Firkins; J Dijkstra; E Kebreab; G Waghorn; H P S Makkar; A T Adesogan; W Yang; C Lee; P J Gerber; B Henderson; J M Tricarico
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Exploring the bovine rumen bacterial community from birth to adulthood.

Authors:  Elie Jami; Adi Israel; Assaf Kotser; Itzhak Mizrahi
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 10.302

8.  Comparison of duodenal flow and digestibility in fauna-free sheep inoculated with Holotrich protozoa, Entodinium monofauna or total mixed protozoa population.

Authors:  M Ivan
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 3.718

9.  Methane emissions from cattle.

Authors:  K A Johnson; D E Johnson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  A cryopreservation procedure for the rumen protozoon Entodinium caudatum: estimation of its viability by fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  G de la Fuente; J A Cebrián; M Fondevila
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.858

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  The rumen microbiome: balancing food security and environmental impacts.

Authors:  Itzhak Mizrahi; R John Wallace; Sarah Moraïs
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Effects and mode of action of chitosan and ivy fruit saponins on the microbiome, fermentation and methanogenesis in the rumen simulation technique.

Authors:  Alejandro Belanche; Eric Pinloche; David Preskett; C Jamie Newbold
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 4.194

3.  A Metagenomics Approach to Evaluate the Impact of Dietary Supplementation with Ascophyllum nodosum or Laminaria digitata on Rumen Function in Rusitec Fermenters.

Authors:  Alejandro Belanche; Eleanor Jones; Ifat Parveen; Charles J Newbold
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Repeated inoculation of cattle rumen with bison rumen contents alters the rumen microbiome and improves nitrogen digestibility in cattle.

Authors:  Gabriel O Ribeiro; Daniela B Oss; Zhixiong He; Robert J Gruninger; Chijioke Elekwachi; Robert J Forster; WenZhu Yang; Karen A Beauchemin; Tim A McAllister
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Effects of Starch Level and a Mixture of Sunflower and Fish Oils on Nutrient Intake and Digestibility, Rumen Fermentation, and Ruminal Methane Emissions in Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Babak Darabighane; Ilma Tapio; Laura Ventto; Piia Kairenius; Tomasz Stefański; Heidi Leskinen; Kevin J Shingfield; Johanna Vilkki; Ali-Reza Bayat
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Ruminal Protozoal Populations of Angus Steers Differing in Feed Efficiency.

Authors:  Brooke A Clemmons; Sung B Shin; Timothy P L Smith; Mallory M Embree; Brynn H Voy; Liesel G Schneider; Dallas R Donohoe; Kyle J McLean; Phillip R Myer
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Does Dietary Mitigation of Enteric Methane Production Affect Rumen Function and Animal Productivity in Dairy Cows?

Authors:  Jolien B Veneman; Stefan Muetzel; Kenton J Hart; Catherine L Faulkner; Jon M Moorby; Hink B Perdok; Charles J Newbold
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Manipulating rumen microbiome and fermentation through interventions during early life: a review.

Authors:  David R Yáñez-Ruiz; Leticia Abecia; Charles J Newbold
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  An Integrated Multi-Omics Approach Reveals the Effects of Supplementing Grass or Grass Hay with Vitamin E on the Rumen Microbiome and Its Function.

Authors:  Alejandro Belanche; Alison H Kingston-Smith; Charles J Newbold
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 10.  The Role of Ciliate Protozoa in the Rumen.

Authors:  Charles J Newbold; Gabriel de la Fuente; Alejandro Belanche; Eva Ramos-Morales; Neil R McEwan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.