| Literature DB >> 27375609 |
Alejandro Belanche1, Alison H Kingston-Smith1, Charles J Newbold1.
Abstract
Rumen function is generally suboptimal leading to losses in methane and nitrogen. Analysis of the rumen microbiome is thus important to understanding the underlying microbial activity under different feeding strategies. This study investigated the effect of forage conservation method and vitamin E supplementation on rumen function using a rumen simulation technique. Ryegrass (GRA) or ryegrass hay (HAY) was supplemented with 20% concentrate containing zero or 50 IU/d vitamin E, as α-tocopheryl acetate, according to a 2 × 2 factorial design. The forage conservation method did not substantially change the nutrient composition but had a profound impact on the structure and diversity of the rumen microbiome. HAY diets promoted a more complex bacterial community (+38 OTUs) dominated by Firmicutes. This bacterial adaptation, together with increased rumen protozoa levels and methanogen diversity, was associated with greater fiber disappearance (+12%) in HAY diets, but also with greater rumen true N degradability (+7%) than GRA diets. HAY diets also had a higher metabolic H recovery and methane production (+35%) suggesting more efficient inter-species H transfer between bacteria, protozoa and methanogens. Contrarily, GRA diets promoted more simplified methanogen and bacterial communities, which were dominated by Bacteroidetes and Lactobacillus, thus lactate formation may have acted as an alternative H sink in GRA diets. Moreover the structure of the bacterial community with GRA diets was highly correlated with N utilization, and GRA diets promoted greater bacterial growth and microbial protein synthesis (+16%), as well as a more efficient microbial protein synthesis (+22%). A dose-response experiment using batch cultures revealed that vitamin E supplementation increased rumen fermentation in terms of total VFA and gas production, with protozoal activity higher when supplying α-tocopheryl acetate vs. α-tocopherol. Moreover, α-tocopheryl acetate promoted a small increase in feed degradability (+8%), possibly as a result of its antioxidant properties which led to higher bacterial and protozoal levels. Vitamin E supplementation also modified the levels of some methanogen species indicating that they may be particularly sensitive to oxidative stresses. Our findings suggested that when possible, grass should be fed instead of grass hay, in order to improve rumen function and to decrease the environmental impact of livestock agriculture.Entities:
Keywords: Rusitec; grass; hay; methanogenesis; rumen fermentation; rumen microbiome; vitamin E
Year: 2016 PMID: 27375609 PMCID: PMC4901035 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00905
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Effect of different forms and doses of vitamin E on the rumen function and protozoal activity in rumen batch cultures (Experiment 1).
| pH | 6.36 | 6.34 | 6.36 | 6.36 | 6.34 | 6.36 | 6.37 | 6.35 | 6.35 | 6.34 | 0.023 | 0.776 | 0.644 | 0.793 |
| NH3-N (mg/dL) | 19.6 | 21.0 | 22.2 | 20.2 | 21.3 | 19.6 | 22.1 | 19.9 | 20.6 | 21.4 | 2.440 | 0.899 | 0.793 | 0.893 |
| Total VFA (mM) | 62.0 | 73.4 | 78.1 | 72.6 | 68.5 | 62.0 | 69.7 | 73.3 | 80.6 | 75.6 | 4.510 | 0.516 | <0.001 | 0.163 |
| Acetate (%) | 67.7bc | 68.2ab | 68.1abc | 67.9abc | 67.6bc | 67.7bc | 67.8abc | 67.3c | 68.5a | 68.5a | 0.394 | 0.748 | 0.253 | 0.040 |
| Propionate (%) | 16.4 | 16.5 | 16.6 | 16.6 | 16.7 | 16.4 | 16.5 | 16.7 | 16.5 | 16.4 | 0.140 | 0.551 | 0.079 | 0.428 |
| Butyrate (%) | 11.6 | 11.3 | 11.1 | 11.3 | 11.5 | 11.6 | 11.5 | 11.5 | 11.0 | 11.1 | 0.217 | 0.982 | 0.116 | 0.090 |
| Asymptotic GP (mL) | 116 | 119 | 120 | 120 | 124 | 116 | 117 | 120 | 117 | 119 | 2.155 | 0.035 | 0.037 | 0.441 |
| GP rate (μL/h) | 64.5 | 64.8 | 67.3 | 69.0 | 68.3 | 64.5 | 65.6 | 67.0 | 64.5 | 67.5 | 1.400 | 0.144 | 0.011 | 0.102 |
| FOM | 309 | 366 | 388 | 361 | 342 | 309 | 348 | 365 | 401 | 376 | 22.27 | 0.513 | <0.001 | 0.178 |
| Methane (mmol/d) | 0.90 | 0.91 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.90 | 0.91 | 0.94 | 0.89 | 0.93 | 0.025 | 0.337 | 0.239 | 0.786 |
| Methane (mmol/g FOM) | 2.99 | 2.51 | 2.42 | 2.60 | 2.76 | 2.99 | 2.64 | 2.57 | 2.23 | 2.49 | 0.224 | 0.488 | 0.012 | 0.384 |
| Protozoal activity | 9.95 | 9.58 | 9.36 | 9.46 | 9.53 | 9.95 | 10.26 | 10.41 | 9.95 | 9.66 | 0.404 | 0.015 | 0.677 | 0.376 |
Fermentable OM stoichiometrically calculated based on VFA production (Marty and Demeyer, 1973).
Protozoal activity determined in vitro as the percentage of 14C-labeled bacteria degraded by rumen protozoa.
Standard error of the difference among means for the interaction T × D (n = 4). Within a row means without a common superscript differ (P < 0.05).
Chemical composition of the experimental diets (in % of DM unless stated).
| Dry matter (% FM) | 17.5 | 84.9 | 88.6 |
| Organic matter | 91.2 | 91.0 | 93.8 |
| Nitrogen | 1.83 | 1.69 | 2.51 |
| Carbon | 43.8 | 43.5 | 44.7 |
| Neutral detergent fiber | 50.0 | 54.6 | 39.3 |
| Acid detergent fiber | 24.0 | 28.1 | 12.1 |
| Vitamin E (IU/kg DM) | 72.3 | 30.8 | ND |
Commercial concentrate made of: wheat 44.25, barley 15, palm kernel expeller 14, rapeseed expeller 11.7, maize meal 7.5, wheat-feed 5, limestone flour 1.95, NaHCO3 0.3, NaCl 0.15 and NH4Cl 0.15% in DM. ND, not detected (Celtic Pride Premium Beef Nuts, UK).
Effect of the type of forage and vitamin E supplementation on feed degradability and methanogenesis in the Rusitec system.
| OM | 57.4 | 63.5 | 60.6 | 63.7 | 3.34 | 0.483 | 0.084 | 0.532 |
| C | 58.3 | 63.8 | 61.9 | 64.5 | 3.02 | 0.340 | 0.090 | 0.507 |
| NDF | 44.1 | 52.5 | 52.8 | 55.1 | 3.99 | 0.076 | 0.089 | 0.307 |
| ADF | 33.0 | 40.0 | 44.8 | 47.6 | 4.61 | 0.016 | 0.170 | 0.541 |
| Total gas (L/d) | 1.72 | 1.71 | 1.82 | 2.03 | 0.092 | 0.009 | 0.167 | 0.133 |
| Methane (mM) | 2.97 | 2.92 | 3.30 | 3.73 | 0.310 | 0.030 | 0.416 | 0.308 |
| Methane (mmol/d) | 5.10 | 5.01 | 6.04 | 7.59 | 0.792 | 0.012 | 0.223 | 0.180 |
| Methane (mmol/g Deg.OM) | 0.87 | 0.77 | 0.96 | 1.15 | 0.105 | 0.011 | 0.584 | 0.091 |
| [H] produced | 58.2 | 64.0 | 67.8 | 67.9 | 5.100 | 0.093 | 0.432 | 0.450 |
| [H] incorporated | 50.5 | 52.9 | 60.8 | 66.0 | 4.840 | 0.008 | 0.298 | 0.685 |
| [H] recovery | 87.3 | 82.7 | 89.6 | 97.4 | 4.160 | 0.018 | 0.588 | 0.064 |
| CH4:VFA (mol/mol) | 0.165 | 0.149 | 0.172 | 0.214 | 0.020 | 0.033 | 0.405 | 0.069 |
Standard error of the difference for the interaction between the type of forage and the vitamin E supplementation at 50 IU/d (F × V, n = 4).
Metabolic hydrogen stoichiometrically calculated based on VFA production (Marty and Demeyer, 1973).
Effect of the type of forage and vitamin E supplementation on rumen fermentation pattern in the Rusitec system.
| pH | 6.69 | 6.65 | 6.76 | 6.75 | 0.036 | 0.003 | 0.349 | 0.587 |
| E | −109 | −106 | −113 | −116 | 2.980 | 0.003 | 0.807 | 0.144 |
| Ammonia-N (mg/dL) | 6.94 | 7.31 | 5.88 | 5.99 | 0.306 | <0.001 | 0.273 | 0.550 |
| Total VFA (mM) | 43.4 | 43.8 | 43.4 | 43.3 | 2.229 | 0.877 | 0.934 | 0.851 |
| Acetate | 41.3 | 42.2 | 42.7 | 42.8 | 0.652 | 0.042 | 0.304 | 0.423 |
| Propionate | 21.6 | 21.9 | 24.7 | 24.5 | 0.922 | <0.001 | 0.897 | 0.742 |
| Butyrate | 20.8 | 19.0 | 20.0 | 19.9 | 0.713 | 0.888 | 0.076 | 0.102 |
| Branched-chain VFA | 4.29 | 4.09 | 4.31 | 4.48 | 0.126 | 0.027 | 0.874 | 0.054 |
| Lactate (mM) | 4.53 | 5.69 | 2.01 | 2.66 | 0.915 | <0.001 | 0.176 | 0.703 |
| D/L ratio | 0.86 | 0.81 | 0.70 | 0.45 | 0.127 | 0.007 | 0.109 | 0.288 |
| Bacteria | 8.48 | 8.61 | 8.30 | 8.50 | 0.096 | 0.046 | 0.021 | 0.660 |
| Anaerobic fungi | 2.92 | 2.91 | 2.84 | 2.99 | 0.172 | 0.990 | 0.573 | 0.500 |
| Methanogens | 1.36 | 1.35 | 1.17 | 1.49 | 0.134 | 0.766 | 0.110 | 0.089 |
| Methanogens (103 × ΔCT) | 0.23 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.23 | 0.769 | 0.758 | 0.728 | 0.193 |
Standard error of the difference for the interaction between the type of forage and the vitamin E supplementation at 50 IU/d (F × V). Samples were taken at 4 and 24 h after feeding (n = 8).
PERMANOVA illustrating the effect of the type of forage and vitamin E supplementation on the structure of the bacterial and methanogen communities in the Rusitec system.
| Forage | 3.92 | 0.037 | 2.80 | 0.082 |
| Vitamin E | 1.38 | 0.283 | 2.83 | 0.103 |
| Forage × Vitamin E | 1.11 | 0.366 | 0.70 | 0.575 |
Higher Pseudo-F and lower similarities and P-values correspond to greater differences in the microbial composition. Samples were taken at 4 and 24 h after feeding (n = 8).
Figure 1Canonical correspondence analysis illustrating the effect of grass (GRA), grass hay (HAY) and vitamin E supplementation (−, +) on the relationship between the structure of the bacterial community (A) or methanogen community (B) with the rumen function in the Rusitec system. Arrows show the direction of the gradient and their length is proportional to the correlation. Arrows longer that the dotted circle are significant (P < 0.05). Centroid is indicated for each treatment: GRA– (green), GRA+ (blue), HAY– (yellow), HAY+ (red). Circles and squares represent samples taken at 4 and 24 h after feeding, respectively.
Effect of the type of forage and vitamin E supplementation on rumen biodiversity indices of the bacterial, methanogen and protozoal communities in the Rusitec system.
| Richness | 632 | 616 | 688 | 635 | 22.22 | 0.025 | 0.039 | 0.252 |
| Shannon | 4.68 | 4.53 | 5.07 | 4.60 | 0.119 | 0.011 | 0.001 | 0.073 |
| Evenness | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.017 | 0.024 | 0.002 | 0.097 |
| Simpson | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.008 | 0.113 | 0.021 | 0.213 |
| Chao | 848 | 802 | 879 | 905 | 80.50 | 0.250 | 0.859 | 0.533 |
| Good's coverage | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.028 | 0.900 | 0.106 | 0.301 |
| Richness | 13.3 | 13.1 | 14.0 | 14.4 | 0.536 | 0.014 | 0.745 | 0.516 |
| Shannon | 1.72 | 1.62 | 1.76 | 1.72 | 0.037 | 0.011 | 0.015 | 0.24 |
| Evenness | 0.67 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.014 | 0.334 | 0.012 | 0.44 |
| Simpson | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.011 | 0.049 | 0.035 | 0.51 |
| Chao | 13.4 | 13.9 | 15.8 | 14.9 | 0.946 | 0.017 | 0.712 | 0.314 |
| Good's | 0.92 | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.89 | 0.033 | 0.455 | 0.786 | 0.119 |
| Total (log cells/mL) | 3.75 | 3.90 | 4.06 | 4.08 | 0.137 | <0.001 | 0.075 | 0.160 |
| Subf. | 65.4 | 64.6 | 73.8 | 73.4 | 6.250 | 0.083 | 0.989 | 0.963 |
| Subf. | 1.98 | 2.34 | 0.30 | 0.65 | 0.604 | 0.003 | 0.427 | 0.997 |
| 0.17 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 0.22 | 0.205 | 0.768 | 0.551 | 0.406 | |
| 32.4 | 33.9 | 25.9 | 25.7 | 5.94 | 0.136 | 0.966 | 0.939 | |
Standard error of the difference for the interaction between the type of forage and the vitamin E supplementation at 50 IU/d (F × V). Samples were taken at 4 and 24 h after feeding (n = 8).
Protozoal samples were taken before feeding and measured by optical microscopy (n = 4).
Figure 2Effect of the type of forage and vitamin E supplementation on the abundance of the main bacterial (A–E) and archaeal (F) phyla and families in the Rusitec system. Samples were taken at 4 and 24h after feeding (n = 8).
Effect of the type of forage and vitamin E supplementation on fermentation products and microbial protein synthesis in the Rusitec system.
| Total VFA | 31.2 | 33.8 | 35.1 | 35.5 | 2.374 | 0.131 | 0.383 | 0.536 |
| Acetate | 14.2 | 15.7 | 15.7 | 16.8 | 1.247 | 0.182 | 0.164 | 0.794 |
| Propionate | 8.02 | 8.93 | 9.60 | 9.96 | 0.801 | 0.047 | 0.293 | 0.631 |
| Butyrate | 4.50 | 4.94 | 5.51 | 5.04 | 0.483 | 0.139 | 0.975 | 0.211 |
| Isobutyrate | 0.39 | 0.41 | 0.39 | 0.41 | 0.036 | 0.950 | 0.433 | 0.947 |
| Valerate | 1.28 | 1.27 | 1.60 | 1.42 | 0.067 | <0.001 | 0.066 | 0.107 |
| Isovalerate | 1.07 | 1.28 | 1.13 | 1.22 | 0.086 | 0.958 | 0.034 | 0.356 |
| Ammonia N (mg/d) | 58.8 | 58.3 | 48.8 | 46.5 | 3.86 | 0.003 | 0.616 | 0.755 |
| DM (g/d) | 15.0 | 15.3 | 14.4 | 14.2 | 0.50 | 0.046 | 0.955 | 0.559 |
| Vitamin E | 2.27c | 35.3b | 0.60c | 51.7a | 4.44 | 0.043 | <0.001 | 0.018 |
| NAN | 140 | 152 | 122 | 115 | 6.92 | <0.001 | 0.609 | 0.084 |
| NANM-N | 39.9b | 54.8a | 36.9b | 28.6b | 5.97 | 0.007 | 0.456 | 0.022 |
| Microbial-N | 100.5 | 97.7 | 84.9 | 86.3 | 4.71 | 0.003 | 0.840 | 0.536 |
| Rumen apparent N degradability | 36.5 | 31.0 | 41.8 | 45.1 | 3.15 | 0.002 | 0.630 | 0.079 |
| Rumen true N degradability | 82.0a | 75.2b | 82.4a | 86.4a | 2.73 | 0.015 | 0.491 | 0.021 |
| Microbial-N from ammonia | 36.0 | 36.3 | 45.7 | 44.8 | 2.47 | <0.001 | 0.875 | 0.746 |
| Microbial-N: NAN | 0.72ab | 0.64b | 0.70ab | 0.75a | 0.033 | 0.094 | 0.726 | 0.024 |
| Microbial-N: N intake | 0.45 | 0.44 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.022 | 0.032 | 0.862 | 0.548 |
| Microbial-N: true N degradable | 0.55 | 0.59 | 0.49 | 0.48 | 0.031 | 0.003 | 0.622 | 0.269 |
| Microbial-N: Deg.OM (mg/g) | 17.0 | 14.9 | 13.6 | 13.2 | 0.644 | <0.001 | 0.027 | 0.104 |
Standard error of the difference for the interaction between the type of forage and the vitamin E supplementation at 50 IU/d (F × V, n = 4). Within a row means without a common superscript differ (P < 0.05).
NANM-N; non-ammonia non-microbial N calculated by subtracting microbial N from non-ammonia N flow.