Literature DB >> 22539164

Structures of free-living and protozoa-associated methanogen communities in the bovine rumen differ according to comparative analysis of 16S rRNA and mcrA genes.

Lisa D Tymensen1, Karen A Beauchemin1, Tim A McAllister1.   

Abstract

Structures of free-living and protozoa-associated methanogen (PAM) communities from forage-fed cattle were investigated by comparative sequence analysis of 16S rRNA and methyl coenzyme M reductase (mcrA) gene clone libraries. The free-living and protozoa-associated communities were composed of the same three genera [namely Methanobrevibacter, Methanomicrobium and rumen cluster C (RCC), which is distantly related to Thermoplasma]; however, the distribution of the methanogen genera differed between the two communities. Despite previous reports of potential bias for the degenerate mcrA primer set, the 16S rRNA (n = 100 clones) and mcrA (n = 92 clones) gene libraries exhibited a similar distribution pattern for the three methanogenic genera. RCC was more abundant in the free-living community and represented 72 and 42 % of the 16S rRNA and mrcA gene sequences, respectively, versus 54 and 13 % of the 16S rRNA and mrcA gene sequences from the PAM community, respectively. The majority of RCC sequences from the free-living and protozoa-associated communities belonged to different species-level operational taxonomic units. Methanobrevibacter species were more abundant in the PAM community and represented 42 and 79 % of clones for the 16S rRNA and mrcA gene libraries, respectively, versus 9 and 27 % of 16S rRNA and mrcA gene clones from the free-living community, respectively. Methanomicrobium species were predominantly free-living. Primers for quantitative PCR were designed to target specific methanogen groups and used to assess the effect of a high-grain diet on methanogen species composition. Switching the ruminant diet from forage to high-grain resulted in reduced protozoal diversity, along with a profound overall reduction in the relative abundance of RCC and an increase in the relative abundance of free-living Methanobrevibacter spp. It was unclear whether the reduced abundance of RCC in grain-fed animals was due to the loss of symbiotic protozoa species or due to broader changes in the rumen environment that affected both RCC and protozoa. Importantly, results from this study emphasize the need to consider the different methanogen communities when developing strategies for mitigating methane emissions in ruminants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22539164     DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.057984-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiology        ISSN: 1350-0872            Impact factor:   2.777


  18 in total

1.  Buccal swabbing as a noninvasive method to determine bacterial, archaeal, and eukaryotic microbial community structures in the rumen.

Authors:  Sandra Kittelmann; Michelle R Kirk; Arjan Jonker; Alan McCulloch; Peter H Janssen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Effect of progressive inoculation of fauna-free sheep with holotrich protozoa and total-fauna on rumen fermentation, microbial diversity and methane emissions.

Authors:  Alejandro Belanche; Gabriel de la Fuente; Charles J Newbold
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 4.194

3.  Extracellular quinones affecting methane production and methanogenic community in paddy soil.

Authors:  Jielong Xu; Li Zhuang; Guiqin Yang; Yong Yuan; Shungui Zhou
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2013-08-04       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 4.  Toward the identification of methanogenic archaeal groups as targets of methane mitigation in livestock animalsr.

Authors:  Benoit St-Pierre; Laura M Cersosimo; Suzanne L Ishaq; André-Denis G Wright
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Methanogen Diversity in Indigenous and Introduced Ruminant Species on the Tibetan Plateau.

Authors:  Xiao Dan Huang; Gonzalo Martinez-Fernandez; Jagadish Padmanabha; Ruijun Long; Stuart E Denman; Christopher S McSweeney
Journal:  Archaea       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.273

6.  Rumen microbial communities influence metabolic phenotypes in lambs.

Authors:  Diego P Morgavi; Estelle Rathahao-Paris; Milka Popova; Julien Boccard; Kristian F Nielsen; Hamid Boudra
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 7.  Rumen methanogens and mitigation of methane emission by anti-methanogenic compounds and substances.

Authors:  Amlan Patra; Tansol Park; Minseok Kim; Zhongtang Yu
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2017-01-26

8.  Response of the Rumen Microbiota of Sika Deer (Cervus nippon) Fed Different Concentrations of Tannin Rich Plants.

Authors:  Zhipeng Li; André-Denis G Wright; Hanlu Liu; Zhongyuan Fan; Fuhe Yang; Zhigang Zhang; Guangyu Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Study of methanogen communities associated with different rumen protozoal populations.

Authors:  Alejandro Belanche; Gabriel de la Fuente; Charles J Newbold
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 4.194

Review 10.  The Role of Ciliate Protozoa in the Rumen.

Authors:  Charles J Newbold; Gabriel de la Fuente; Alejandro Belanche; Eva Ramos-Morales; Neil R McEwan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.