OBJECTIVE: In 2011, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommended a substantial reduction in the equivalent dose limit for the lens of the eye, in line with a reduced threshold of absorbed dose for radiation-induced cataracts. This is of particular relevance in interventional radiology (IR) where it is well established that staff doses can be significant, however, there is a lack of data on IR eye doses in terms of Hp(3). Hp(3) is the personal dose equivalent at a depth of 3 mm in soft tissue and is used for measuring lens dose. We aimed to obtain a reliable estimate of eye dose to IR operators. METHODS: Lens doses were measured for four interventional radiologists over a 3-month period using dosemeters specifically designed to measure Hp(3). RESULTS: Based on their typical workloads, two of the four interventional radiologists would exceed the new ICRP dose limit with annual estimated doses of 31 and 45 mSv to their left eye. These results are for an "unprotected" eye, and for IR staff who routinely wear lead glasses, the dose beneath the glasses is likely to be significantly lower. Staff eye dose normalized to patient kerma-area product and eye dose per procedure have been included in the analysis. CONCLUSION: Eye doses to IR operators have been established using a dedicated Hp(3) dosemeter. Estimated annual doses have the potential to exceed the new ICRP limit. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: We have estimated lens dose to interventional radiologists in terms of Hp(3) for the first time in an Irish hospital setting.
OBJECTIVE: In 2011, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommended a substantial reduction in the equivalent dose limit for the lens of the eye, in line with a reduced threshold of absorbed dose for radiation-induced cataracts. This is of particular relevance in interventional radiology (IR) where it is well established that staff doses can be significant, however, there is a lack of data on IR eye doses in terms of Hp(3). Hp(3) is the personal dose equivalent at a depth of 3 mm in soft tissue and is used for measuring lens dose. We aimed to obtain a reliable estimate of eye dose to IR operators. METHODS: Lens doses were measured for four interventional radiologists over a 3-month period using dosemeters specifically designed to measure Hp(3). RESULTS: Based on their typical workloads, two of the four interventional radiologists would exceed the new ICRP dose limit with annual estimated doses of 31 and 45 mSv to their left eye. These results are for an "unprotected" eye, and for IR staff who routinely wear lead glasses, the dose beneath the glasses is likely to be significantly lower. Staff eye dose normalized to patient kerma-area product and eye dose per procedure have been included in the analysis. CONCLUSION: Eye doses to IR operators have been established using a dedicated Hp(3) dosemeter. Estimated annual doses have the potential to exceed the new ICRP limit. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: We have estimated lens dose to interventional radiologists in terms of Hp(3) for the first time in an Irish hospital setting.
Authors: J Domienik; M Brodecki; E Carinou; L Donadille; J Jankowski; C Koukorava; S Krim; D Nikodemova; N Ruiz-Lopez; M Sans-Mercé; L Struelens; F Vanhavere Journal: Radiat Prot Dosimetry Date: 2010-12-23 Impact factor: 0.972
Authors: Kwang Pyo Kim; Donald L Miller; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Stephen Balter; Ruth A Kleinerman; Evgenia Ostroumova; Steven L Simon; Martha S Linet Journal: Health Phys Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 1.316
Authors: Mark P Little; Cari M Kitahara; Elizabeth K Cahoon; Marie-Odile Bernier; Raquel Velazquez-Kronen; Michele M Doody; David Borrego; Jeremy S Miller; Bruce H Alexander; Steven L Simon; Dale L Preston; Nobuyuki Hamada; Martha S Linet; Craig Meyer Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2018-08-27 Impact factor: 8.082