Literature DB >> 20970356

Unprotected operator eye lens doses in oncologic interventional radiology are clinically significant: estimation from patient kerma-area-product data.

Lawrence T Dauer1, Raymond H Thornton, Stephen B Solomon, Jean St Germain.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To correlate operator lens dose to patient-delivered kerma-area-product (P(KA)) to evaluate the usefulness of P(KA) as a surrogate for operator eye dose if collar monitor readings are unavailable or deemed unreliable, and to evaluate if unprotected lens dose is clinically significant.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of peak skin doses for consecutive interventional radiology procedures performed during 2006 that had P(KA) estimates recorded was performed. Unshielded operator lens dose equivalents (LDE) were obtained from dosimetry monitors worn outside the collar shield of operating interventional radiologists. Operator LDE were correlated with patient P(KA).
RESULTS: Average LDE for 2006 was 35.7 mSv ± 32.7 (range 5.2-89.9 mSv). Patient-delivered P(KA) correlated directly with LDE, where 1 Gy cm(2) to the patient resulted in an average of 4.2 μSv to the unprotected eyes of the primary operator (r(2) = 0.7).
CONCLUSIONS: P(KA) may be useful as a surrogate measure of operator LDE if collar monitor readings are unavailable or deemed unreliable. For this study, the dose-effect threshold for cataract formation could be surpassed for some physicians within 11 years if lens dose-mitigating strategies are not routinely employed.
Copyright © 2010 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20970356     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2010.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  4 in total

Review 1.  Occupational radiation doses to operators performing fluoroscopically-guided procedures.

Authors:  Kwang Pyo Kim; Donald L Miller; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Stephen Balter; Ruth A Kleinerman; Evgenia Ostroumova; Steven L Simon; Martha S Linet
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.316

2.  Occupational radiation dose to eyes from interventional radiology procedures in light of the new eye lens dose limit from the International Commission on Radiological Protection.

Authors:  U O'Connor; C Walsh; A Gallagher; A Dowling; M Guiney; J M Ryan; N McEniff; G O'Reilly
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Radiobiology in Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Pat Zanzonico; Lawrence Dauer; H William Strauss
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-12

4.  Can leaded glasses protect the eye lens in patients undergoing neck computed tomography?

Authors:  Reza Abedi; Naser Ghaemian; Ali Shabestani Monfared; Mohammad Kiapour; Razzagh Abedi-Firouzjah; Fatemeh Niksirat; Alaba Tolulope Agbele; Kourosh Ebrahimnejad Gorji
Journal:  J Clin Transl Res       Date:  2021-07-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.