Literature DB >> 21764807

Radiation and cataract.

Madan M Rehani1, Eliseo Vano, Olivera Ciraj-Bjelac, Norman J Kleiman.   

Abstract

When this paper was about to go to press, the International Commission on Radiological Protection released a statement recommending a change in the threshold dose for the eye lens and dose limits for eye for occupationally exposed persons. It is clear that the earlier published threshold for radiation cataract is no longer valid. Epidemiological studies among Chernobyl clean-up workers, A bomb survivors, astronauts, residents of contaminated buildings, radiological technicians and recent surveys of staff in interventional rooms indicate that there is an increased incidence of lens opacities at doses below 1 Gy. Nevertheless, eye lens dosimetry is at a primitive stage and needs to be developed further. Despite uncertainties concerning dose threshold and dosimetry, it is possible to significantly reduce the risk of radiation cataract through the use of appropriate eye protection. By increasing awareness among those at risk and better adoption and increased usage of protective measures, radiation cataract can become preventable despite lowering of dose limits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21764807     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncr299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  21 in total

1.  Data analysis of low dose multislice helical CT scan in orbital trauma.

Authors:  Ji-Wei Wang; Chong Tang; Bo-Rong Pan
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  [Eye lens radiation exposure during ureteroscopy with and without a face protection shield: Investigations on a phantom model].

Authors:  G Zöller; M Figel; J Denk; K Schulz; A Sabo
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Occupational radiation dose to eyes from interventional radiology procedures in light of the new eye lens dose limit from the International Commission on Radiological Protection.

Authors:  U O'Connor; C Walsh; A Gallagher; A Dowling; M Guiney; J M Ryan; N McEniff; G O'Reilly
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Hand Surgery and Fluoroscopic Eye Radiation Dosage: A Prospective Pilot Comparison of Large Versus Mini C-Arm Fluoroscopy Use.

Authors:  Mark L Wang; C Edward Hoffler; Asif M Ilyas; William H Kirkpatrick; Pedro K Beredjiklian; Charles F Leinberry
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2016-04-06

Review 5.  Occupational exposure to low doses of ionizing radiation and cataract development: a systematic literature review and perspectives on future studies.

Authors:  Gaël P Hammer; Ulrike Scheidemann-Wesp; Florence Samkange-Zeeb; Henryk Wicke; Kazuo Neriishi; Maria Blettner
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Biological Effects of Space Radiation and Development of Effective Countermeasures.

Authors:  Ann R Kennedy
Journal:  Life Sci Space Res (Amst)       Date:  2014-04-01

7.  30 years After the Chernobyl Nuclear Accident: Time for Reflection and Re-evaluation of Current Disaster Preparedness Plans.

Authors:  Lydia B Zablotska
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.671

Review 8.  Radiobiology in Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Pat Zanzonico; Lawrence Dauer; H William Strauss
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-12

9.  Lauriston S. Taylor Lecture on radiation protection and measurements: what makes particle radiation so effective?

Authors:  Eleanor A Blakely
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.316

10.  The radiation issue in cardiology: the time for action is now.

Authors:  Eugenio Picano; Eliseo Vano
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 2.062

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.