Literature DB >> 25753085

Revision total knee arthroplasty: the end of the allograft era?

Sébastien Parratte1, Matthew P Abdel, Alexandre Lunebourg, Nicolaas Budhiparama, David G Lewallen, Arlen D Hanssen, Jean-Noël Argenson.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2015        PMID： 25753085     DOI： 10.1007/s00590-015-1615-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN： 1633-8065


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  Why are total knee arthroplasties being revised?

Authors:  David F Dalury; Donald L Pomeroy; Robert S Gorab; Mary Jo Adams
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Porous tantalum cones for large metaphyseal tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: a minimum 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  William J Long; Giles R Scuderi
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 3.  Femorotibial bone loss during revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  D Huten
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 2.256

4.  Revision total knee arthroplasty with the use of trabecular metal cones: a randomized radiostereometric analysis with 2 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Claus L Jensen; Michael M Petersen; Henrik M Schrøder; Gunnar Flivik; Bjarne Lund
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty: a five to nine-year follow-up.

Authors:  Atul F Kamath; David G Lewallen; Arlen D Hanssen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement.

Authors:  R Michael Meneghini; David G Lewallen; Arlen D Hanssen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Validation study of a pooled electronic healthcare database: the effect of obesity on the revision rate of total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kiel J Pfefferle; Karen M Gil; Stephen D Fening; Matthew F Dilisio
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-02-16

8.  Clinical and economic burden of revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mohit Bhandari; Jon Smith; Larry E Miller; Jon E Block
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-12-05
  8 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Bone loss in aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty: management and outcomes.

Authors:  Thomas Bieganowski; Daniel B Buchalter; Vivek Singh; John J Mercuri; Vinay K Aggarwal; Joshua C Rozell; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2022-06-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.