Literature DB >> 22795879

Revision total knee arthroplasty with the use of trabecular metal cones: a randomized radiostereometric analysis with 2 years of follow-up.

Claus L Jensen1, Michael M Petersen, Henrik M Schrøder, Gunnar Flivik, Bjarne Lund.   

Abstract

"Trabecular Metal Cone" (TM Cone) (Zimmer, Inc, Warsaw, Ind) for reconstruction of bone loss in the proximal tibia during revision total knee arthroplasty is now optional. Forty patients were randomized to receive revision total knee arthroplasty with or without TM Cone (No TM Cone). The Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute bone loss classification and NexGen revision system were used. Radiostereometric analysis was performed with 24 months of follow-up. Maximum total point motion: stable migration was seen in the TM Cone group. No statistically significant difference was found. Segment motion analysis at 24 months showed the same net direction of rotation for the groups around the y-, z-axis and around the x-, y-axis for translation. Tibial revision implants with TM Cone result in an early stable situation with less irregular migration pattern than revision without TM Cone.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22795879     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.04.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  6 in total

1.  Revision total knee arthroplasty: the end of the allograft era?

Authors:  Sébastien Parratte; Matthew P Abdel; Alexandre Lunebourg; Nicolaas Budhiparama; David G Lewallen; Arlen D Hanssen; Jean-Noël Argenson
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-03-10

2.  Mechanical properties of a cemented porous implant interface.

Authors:  Nicholas A Beckmann; Rudi G Bitsch; Joern B Seeger; Matthias Cm Klotz; Jan Philippe Kretzer; Sebastian Jaeger
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 3.717

3.  Letter to the Editor: No Difference Between Trabecular Metal Cones and Femoral Head Allografts in Revision TKA: Minimum 5-year Followup.

Authors:  Zhuoyuan Chen; Yang Yang; Tao Xiao
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Tibial component with and without stem extension in a trabecular metal cone construct.

Authors:  Marrigje F Meijer; Alexander L Boerboom; Martin Stevens; Inge H F Reininga; Dennis W Janssen; N Verdonschot; Sjoerd K Bulstra
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Midterm Outcomes of Tantalum Metal Cones for Severe Bone Loss in Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ashok Rajgopal; Sumit Kumar; Kalpana Aggarwal
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-01-11

6.  The use of tantalum cones and diaphyseal-engaging stems in tibial component revision: a consecutive series.

Authors:  P Spinello; R A Ruberte Thiele; K Zepeda; N Giori; P F Indelli
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.